arXiv++ Combinatorics

Ziegler proved that every simplicial $d$-dimensional $0/1$-polytope has at most $2d$ vertices, and asked whether equality forces the polytope to be centrally symmetric and hence, equivalently, a $0/1$-realization of the $d$-dimensional cross polytope. In this note, we give a negative answer, exhibiting an explicit set of $14$ vertices in $\{0,1\}^7$ whose convex hull is a simplicial $7$-polytope and is not centrally symmetric. Moreover, via exhaustive enumeration we show that up to the symmetries of the cube, there are precisely five such polytopes in dimension $7$ (of two combinatorial types) that are not centrally symmetric.

With every family of finitely many subsets of a finite-dimensional vector space over the Galois-field with two elements we associate a cyclic transversal polytope. It turns out that those polytopes generalize several well-known polytopes that are relevant in combinatorial optimization, among them cut polytopes as well as stable set and matching polytopes. We introduce the class of lifted odd-set inequalities and prove results demonstrating their strength. In particular, we show that they suffice to describe cyclic transversal polytopes if the union of the sets in the family has rank at most two. We also describe extended formulations for cyclic transversal polytopes and introduce a special relaxation hierarchy for them.

We describe constructions of extended formulations that establish a certain relaxed version of the Hirsch conjecture and prove that if there is a pivot rule for the simplex algorithm for which one can bound the number of steps by a polynomial in the diameter plus the number of facets of the polyhedron of feasible solutions then the general linear programming problem can be solved in strongly polynomial time.

For a subset T of nodes of an undirected graph G, a T-Steiner cut is a cut δ(S) where S intersects both T and the complement of T. The T-Steiner cut dominant} of G is the dominant CUT_+(G,T) of the convex hull of the incidence vectors of the T-Steiner cuts of G. For T={s,t}, this is the well-understood s-t-cut dominant. Choosing T as the set of all nodes of G, we obtain the \emph{cut dominant}, for which an outer description in the space of the original variables is still not known. We prove that, for each integer τ, there is a finite set of inequalities such that for every pair (G,T) with |T|\ <= τthe non-trivial facet-defining inequalities of CUT_+(G,T) are the inequalities that can be obtained via iterated applications of two simple operations, starting from that set. In particular, the absolute values of the coefficients and of the right-hand-sides in a description of CUT_+(G,T) by integral inequalities can be bounded from above by a function of |T|. For all |T| <= 5 we provide descriptions of CUT_+(G,T) by facet defining inequalities, extending the known descriptions of s-t-cut dominants.

We introduce and study the general problem of finding a most "scale-free-like" spanning tree of a connected graph. It is motivated by a particular problem in epidemiology, and may be useful in studies of various dynamical processes in networks. We employ two possible objective functions for this problem and introduce the corresponding algorithmic problems termed $m$-SF and $s$-SF Spanning Tree problems. We prove that those problems are APX- and NP-hard, respectively, even in the classes of cubic, bipartite and split graphs. We study the relations between scale-free spanning tree problems and the max-leaf spanning tree problem, which is the classical algorithmic problem closest to ours. For split graphs, we explicitly describe the structure of optimal spanning trees and graphs with extremal solutions. Finally, we propose two Integer Linear Programming formulations and two fast heuristics for the $s$-SF Spanning Tree problem, and experimentally assess their performance using simulated and real data.

We reprove that all the matchings constructed during Edmonds' weighted perfect matching algorithm are optimal among those of the same cardinality (provided that certain mild restrictions are obeyed on the choices the algorithm makes). We conclude that in order to solve a weighted matching problem it is not needed to solve a weighted perfect matching problem in an auxiliary graph of doubled size. This result was known before, e.g., posed as an exercise in see Lawler's book from 1976, but is not present in several modern books on combinatorial optimization.

We relate the maximum semidefinite and linear extension complexity of a family of polytopes to the cardinality of this family and the minimum pairwise Hausdorff distance of its members. This result directly implies a known lower bound on the maximum semidefinite extension complexity of 0/1-polytopes. We further show how our result can be used to improve on the corresponding bounds known for polygons with integer vertices. Our geometric proof builds upon nothing else than a simple well-known property of maximum volume inscribed ellipsoids of convex bodies. In particular, it does not rely on factorizations over the semidefinite cone and thus avoids involved procedures of balancing them as required, e.g., in [Briet, Dadush & Pokutta 2015]. We hope that revealing the geometry behind the phenomenon opens doors for further results. Moreover, we show that the linear extension complexity of every d-dimensional 0/1-polytope is bounded from above by O(2^d / d).

The ancillary file Corrigendum.pdf contains an explanation why our proof does not work.

We show that finding minimally intersecting $n$ paths from $s$ to $t$ in a directed graph or $n$ perfect matchings in a bipartite graph can be done in polynomial time. This holds more generally for unimodular set systems.

Given an undirected graph, the non-empty subgraph polytope is the convex hull of the characteristic vectors of pairs (F, S) where S is a non-empty subset of nodes and F is a subset of the edges with both endnodes in S. We obtain a strong relationship between the non-empty subgraph polytope and the spanning forest polytope. We further show that these polytopes provide polynomial size extended formulations for independence polytopes of count matroids, which generalizes recent results obtained by Iwata et al. referring to sparsity matroids. As a byproduct, we obtain new lower bounds on the extension complexity of the spanning forest polytope in terms of extension complexities of independence polytopes of these matroids.

We introduce the simple extension complexity of a polytope P as the smallest number of facets of any simple (i.e., non-degenerate in the sense of linear programming) polytope which can be projected onto P. We devise a combinatorial method to establish lower bounds on the simple extension complexity and show for several polytopes that they have large simple extension complexities. These examples include both the spanning tree and the perfect matching polytopes of complete graphs, uncapacitated flow polytopes for non-trivially decomposable directed acyclic graphs, hypersimplices, and random 0/1-polytopes with vertex numbers within a certain range. On our way to obtain the result on perfect matching polytopes we generalize a result of Padberg and Rao's on the adjacency structures of those polytopes. To complement the lower bounding techniques we characterize in which cases known construction techniques yield simple extensions.

Let X be the set of integer points in some polyhedron. We investigate the smallest number of facets of any polyhedron whose set of integer points is X. This quantity, which we call the relaxation complexity of X, corresponds to the smallest number of linear inequalities of any integer program having X as the set of feasible solutions that does not use auxiliary variables. We show that the use of auxiliary variables is essential for constructing polynomial size integer programming formulations in many relevant cases. In particular, we provide asymptotically tight exponential lower bounds on the relaxation complexity of the integer points of several well-known combinatorial polytopes, including the traveling salesman polytope and the spanning tree polytope.

In this work, we introduce and study the forbidden-vertices problem. Given a polytope P and a subset X of its vertices, we study the complexity of linear optimization over the subset of vertices of P that are not contained in X. This problem is closely related to finding the k-best basic solutions to a linear problem. We show that the complexity of the problem changes significantly depending on the encoding of both P and X. We provide additional tractability results and extended formulations when P has binary vertices only. Some applications and extensions to integral polytopes are discussed.

We establish that the extension complexity of the nXn correlation polytope is at least 1.5^n by a short proof that is self-contained except for using the fact that every face of a polyhedron is the intersection of all facets it is contained in. The main innovative aspect of the proof is a simple combinatorial argument showing that the rectangle covering number of the unique-disjointness matrix is at least 1.5^n, and thus the nondeterministic communication complexity of the unique-disjointness predicate is at least .58n. We thereby slightly improve on the previously best known lower bounds 1.24^n and .31n, respectively.

An extended formulation of a polytope P is a polytope Q which can be projected onto P. Extended formulations of small size (i.e., number of facets) are of interest, as they allow to model corresponding optimization problems as linear programs of small sizes. The main known lower bounds on the minimum sizes of extended formulations for fixed polytope P (Yannakakis 1991) are closely related to the concept of nondeterministic communication complexity. We study the relative power and limitations of the bounds on several examples.

We describe a technique to obtain linear descriptions for polytopes from extended formulations. The simple idea is to first define a suitable lifting function and then to find linear constraints that are valid for the polytope and guarantee lifted points to be contained in the extension. We explain the technique at an example from the literature (matching polytopes), obtain new simple proofs of results on path-set polytopes and small-cliques polytopes, and finally exploit the technique in order to derive linear descriptions of orbisacks, which are special Knapsack polytopes arising in the context of symmetry breaking in integer programming problems.

The concept of representing a polytope that is associated with some combinatorial optimization problem as a linear projection of a higher-dimensional polyhedron has recently received increasing attention. In this paper (written for the newsletter Optima of the Mathematical Optimization Society), we provide a brief introduction to this topic and sketch some of the recent developments with respect to both tools for constructing such extended formulations as well as lower bounds on their sizes.

There are many examples of optimization problems whose associated polyhedra can be described much nicer, and with way less inequalities, by projections of higher dimensional polyhedra than this would be possible in the original space. However, currently not many general tools to construct such extended formulations are available. In this paper, we develop a framework of polyhedral relations that generalizes inductive constructions of extended formulations via projections, and we particularly elaborate on the special case of reflection relations. The latter ones provide polynomial size extended formulations for several polytopes that can be constructed as convex hulls of the unions of (exponentially) many copies of an input polytope obtained via sequences of reflections at hyperplanes. We demonstrate the use of the framework by deriving small extended formulations for the G-permutahedra of all finite reflection groups G (generalizing both Goeman's extended formulation of the permutahedron of size O(n log n) and Ben-Tal and Nemirovski's extended formulation with O(k) inequalities for the regular 2^k-gon) and for Huffman-polytopes (the convex hulls of the weight-vectors of Huffman codes).

This is a chapter (planned to appear in Wiley's upcoming Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science) describing parts of the theory of convex polyhedra that are particularly important for optimization. The topics include polyhedral and finitely generated cones, the Weyl-Minkowski Theorem, faces of polyhedra, projections of polyhedra, integral polyhedra, total dual integrality, and total unimodularity.

In this note, we work out a simple inductive proof showing that every polyhedral cone K is the conic hull of a finite set X of vectors. The base cases of the induction are linear subspaces and linear halfspaces of linear subspaces. The proof also shows that the components of the vectors in X can be chosen (up to their sign) to be quotients of subdeterminants of the coefficient matrix of any inequality system defining K.