arXiv++ Combinatorics

Submodular functions and their close relatives play a key role in combinatorial optimization, decision theory and potential theory. Part of their importance and usefulness stems from the connections with convex functions and polytopes. Here we explore connections between these functions and metric theory, with the bridge provided by diversities, a recently developed generalization of metric spaces to (finite) sets rather than just pairs. Both submodular functions and strongly submodular functions correspond to natural classes of diversities. Submodular diversities, as we define them here, are essentially non-decreasing, intersecting submodular functions which vanish on singletons. We prove new geometric embedding results for these diversities. In particular we show that submodular, strongly submodular, and XOS functions can be represented by the generalized circumradius, a set function in convex analysis equal to the amount a given convex body needs to be stretched to cover a set of points.

We consider a bounded set $P \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ and the lattice-point enumerator $L_P(t) = |tP \cap \mathbb{Z}^d|$ for real $t > 0$. We show that if two bounded measurable sets with boundary of measure zero have the same real-parameter lattice-point enumerators for all integer translates, then their indicator functions agree almost everywhere. As a corollary, any convex body is uniquely determined by this data. Our proof is short and Fourier-analytic, where the key device is a periodic point-counting function whose Fourier coefficients recover the Fourier transform of the indicator function on a dense set. This recovers and extends, with a unified argument, the uniqueness results for rational polytopes and symmetric convex bodies established by Royer [arXiv:1712.01973, arXiv:1712.03937], whose proofs relied on intricate case-specific geometric constructions.

We prove that every full-dimensional compact convex body in $\mathbb R^n$ whose barycenter is its unique interior lattice point and whose volume is $(n+1)^n/n!$ is a unimodular image of the simplex $(n+1)Δ_n-(1,\dots,1)$. This resolves the equality case of Ehrhart's volume conjecture, as a counterpart of the inequality part recently proved by OpenAI. The main result of this paper is obtained by generative AI, particularly GPT-5.6-sol, Fable 5, and the Danus system.

For an $n$-dimensional convex body $K$, let $θ_L(K)$ denote its lattice covering density. We prove that there is an absolute constant $C>0$ such that, uniformly over all such bodies, \[ θ_L(K) \le Cn\log n\,(\log\log n)^{10/3+o(1)}. \] The $o(1)$ term is independent of $K$. This improves the previous universal bound $O(n^2)$ of Ordentlich, Regev, and Weiss and, together with the classical linear lower bound of Coxeter, Few, and Rogers for Euclidean balls, determines the optimal polynomial growth exponent of the worst-case lattice covering density. The main innovation is a vertical--horizontal construction that converts a uniform weight estimate on the full Boolean cube into a lattice covering of any convex body. In a low-dimensional vertical space, folded Gaussians and a finite-field Kakeya theorem select, for every translate, a Boolean pattern with total normalized weight $d^{-5/2+o(1)}$. Gaussian marginals transfer the resulting weights to sections of the body, while entropy yields one horizontal lattice with a very small uncovered set. Finite-index lifting then assembles all shifts into a single lattice, and Rogers' completion lemma makes the covering exact.

We prove that for every Cayley graph $\mathcal{G}$ over any finite abelian group $G$, there is a weighted Cayley graph with $O(\log |G|)$ generators that is a spectral sparsifier for $\mathcal{G}$. This bound is optimal. Applying our bound to the group $G = \mathbb{F}_2^n$, yields, as a corollary, $O(n/\varepsilon^2)$-sized code sparsifiers for $\mathbb{F}_2$-linear codes, improving on the work of Khanna, Putterman and Sudan (SODA'24) who obtained a similar result with an additional $\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ loss. Our proof is strongly inspired by a recent work of Reis and Rothvoss for the construction of $\ell_1$-sparsifiers. Following their work, the abelian Cayley sparsification problem can be reduced to establishing a lower bound for the volume of a certain natural convex body. This volume bound follows from a short, elementary argument that relies on character symmetry.

We construct a reduced planar convex body $R$ with thickness $Δ(R)=1$ and \[\operatorname{area}(R)=0.786215\ldots>0.785398\ldots=\fracπ{4}.\] Thus $R$ is a counterexample to Lassak's conjectured upper bound $\operatorname{area}\le(π/4)Δ^2$ for planar reduced bodies. The construction is given by an explicit support function, and the proofs use only elementary support-function, width, area, and contact-point computations.

Inclusion minimal convex bodies $K$ with the property that the integer translates of $K$ cover the space are studied. Such bodies are referred to as minimal covering bodies and it is shown that, while they are not necessarily tiles, they are polytopes with at least $2d$ facets, if $d$ is the dimension of $K$. Moreover, minimal covering bodies are related to covering properties of Minkowski combinations of convex bodies. Two sharp Brunn Minkowski type inequalities are established for the covering radius of the Minkowski sum of planar convex bodies.

In this paper we present a sharp mixed inequality relating successive minima and quotient covering radii of origin-symmetric convex bodies with respect to lattices. The inequality interpolates between the (classical) covering-density lower bound and the lower bound in Minkowski's second theorem.

A variant of the flatness problem from integer programming is studied, in which one considers convex bodies in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with at most $k$ interior lattice points. The maximum lattice width of such a body is denoted by Flt(d,k) and it is related to the classical flatness constant as well as a conjectural dual version of Minkowski's convex body theorem due to Makai. Moreover, it is shown that Flt(2, 1) = 3, i.e., any planar convex body with at most one interior point has lattice width at most three. This leads to an isominwidth inequality for the lattice point enumerator of planar convex bodies.

What is the largest constant $c\in [0,1]$ with the property that every finite collection $\mathcal{C}$ of axis-parallel squares in the plane admits a disjoint sub-collection $\mathcal{S}$ occupying at least a fraction $c$ of the area covered by $\mathcal{C}$? This problem was first raised by T.~Radó in 1928, who was motivated by a classical covering lemma in real analysis due to Vitali. R.~Rado later generalized the problem from axis-parallel squares in the plane to homothetic copies of any given convex body $K$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, where now we are looking for an optimal constant $F(K)$. Our utmost interest is for cubes and balls in the high-dimensional regime $d\rightarrow \infty$. The estimates that we currently have for cubes are much more precise than those for balls: namely if $Q^d$ is a $d$-dimensional cube, then \[ (e^{-1}+o(1))\frac{2^{-d}}{d \log{d}} \leq F(Q^d)\leq 2^{-d}, \] while denoting $B^d$ a $d$-dimensional Euclidean ball, then \[ (1+ε_d)3^{-d}\leq F(B^d)\leq 2.447^{-d}, \] where $ε_d>0$ vanishes exponentially fast as $d\rightarrow \infty$. The latter upper bound is obtained here by using the Kabatiansky--Levenshtein bound for the sphere packing problem.

We prove the existence of optimal separators for intersection graphs of balls and spheres in any dimension $d$. One of our results is that if an intersection graph of $n$ spheres in $\mathbb{R}^d$ has $m$ edges, then it contains a balanced separator of size $O_d(m^{1/d}n^{1-2/d})$. This bound is best possible in terms of the parameters involved. The same result holds if the balls and spheres are replaced by fat convex bodies and their boundaries.

We study the set of square-free parts of volume polynomials associated with four planar lattice polytopes. This is motivated by the problem of describing possible pairwise intersection numbers of four curves in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2$ with prescribed Newton polytopes and generic coefficients. It is known that for arbitrary convex bodies in $\mathbb{R}^2$, the corresponding square-free polynomials are characterized by the Plücker-type inequalities. We show that this characterization fails in the lattice setting: the interior of the space defined by the Plücker-type inequalities contains integer polynomials that are and are not realizable by lattice polytopes. This phenomenon arises from additional arithmetic constraints on the mixed areas of lattice polytopes. These constraints become apparent when we study a "discrete diagram", which maps a pair of planar lattice polytopes to their mixed area together with their lattice widths in a given direction.

We give two new upper bounds on the covering minima of convex bodies, depending on covering minima of certain projections and intersections with linear subspaces. We show one bound to be sharp for direct sums of two convex bodies, generalizing previous results on the covering radius and lattice width of direct sums. We apply our results to standard terminal simplices, reducing the gap between the upper and lower bounds in a conjecture of Gonzaléz Merino and Schymura (2017), which gives insight on a conjecture of Codenotti, Santos and Schymura (2021) on the maximal covering radius of a non-hollow lattice polytope.

Determining the minimum density of a covering of $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ by Euclidean unit balls as $n\to\infty$ is a major open problem, with the best known results being the lower bound of $\left(\mathrm{e}^{-3/2}+o(1)\right)n$ by Coxeter, Few and Rogers [Mathematika 6, 1959] and the upper bound of $\left(1/2+o(1) \right)n \ln n$ by Dumer [Discrete Comput. Geom. 38, 2007]. We prove that there are ball coverings of $\mathbb{R}^n$ attaining the asymptotically best known density $\left(1/2+o(1) \right)n \ln n$ such that, additionally, every point of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is covered at most $\left(1.79556... + o(1)\right) n \ln n$ times. This strengthens the result of Erdős and Rogers [Acta Arith. 7, 1961/62] who had the maximum multiplicity at most $\left(\mathrm{e} + o(1)\right) n \ln n$. On the other hand, we show that the method that was used for the best known ball coverings (when one takes a random subset of centres in a fundamental domain of a suitable lattice in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and extends this periodically) fails to work if the density is less than $(1/2+o(1))n\ln n$; in fact, this result remains true if we replace the ball by any convex body $K$. Also, we observe that a ``worst'' convex body $K$ here is a cube, for which the packing density coming from random constructions is only $(1+o(1))n\ln n$.

It is well known that every convex body in a finite dimensional normed space can be uniformly approximated by strictly convex and smooth convex bodies. However, in the case of infinite dimensions, little progress has been made since Klee asked how it is in the case of infinite dimensions in 1959. In this paper, we show that for an infinite dimensional Banach space $X$, (1) every convex body can be uniformly approximated by strictly convex bodies if and only if $X$ admits an equivalent strictly convex norm; (2) every convex body can be uniformly approximated by Gâteaux smooth convex bodies if the dual $X^*$ of $X$ admits an equivalent strictly convex dual norm; in particular, (3) if $X$ is either separable, or reflexive, then every convex body in $X$ can be uniformly approximated by strictly convex and smooth convex bodies. They are done by showing that some correspondences among the sets of all convex bodies endowed with the Hausdorff metric, all continuous coercive Minkowski functionals and Fenchel's transform defined on all quadratic homogenous continuous convex functions equipped with the metric induced by the sup-norm of all bounded continuous functions defined on the closed unit ball $B_X$ are actually locally Lipschitz isomorphisms.

In the proof of his famous 5K-theorem, W. Banaszczyk introduced a transformation of convex bodies for which the Gaussian measure is monotone. In this note, we present a simplified proof of this monotonicity by slightly modifying Banaszczyk's transform, so that it interacts smoothly with Ehrhard symmetrizations, thereby yielding a somewhat easier proof of the 5K-theorem.

We introduce the arithmetic width of a convex body, defined as the number of distinct values a linear functional attains on the lattice points within the body. Arithmetic width refines lattice width by detecting gaps in the lattice point distribution and always provides a natural lower bound. We show that for large dilates of a convex body, the attained values form an arithmetic progression with only a bounded number of omissions near the extremes. For rational polytopes, we show that the arithmetic width grows eventually quasilinearly in the dilation parameter, with optimal directions reoccurring periodically. Lastly, we present algorithms to compute the arithmetic width. These results build new connections with discrete geometry, integer programming, and additive combinatorics.

A three-dimensional convex body is said to have Rupert's property if its copy can be passed through a straight hole inside that body. In this work we construct a polyhedron which is provably not Rupert, thus we disprove a conjecture from 2017. We also find a polyhedron that is Rupert but not locally Rupert.

We study approximations of polytopes in the standard model for computing polytopes using Minkowski sums and (convex hulls of) unions. Specifically, we study the ability to approximate a target polytope by polytopes of a given depth. Our main results imply that simplices can only be ``trivially approximated''. On the way, we obtain a characterization of simplices as the only ``outer additive'' convex bodies.

Volume polynomials measure the growth of Minkowski sums of convex bodies and of tensor powers of positive line bundles on projective varieties. We show that Aluffi's covolume polynomials are precisely the polynomial differential operators that preserve volume polynomials, reflecting a duality between homology and cohomology. We then present several applications to matroid theory.