arXiv++ Combinatorics

The degree sequence optimization problem is to find a subgraph of a given graph which maximizes the sum over all vertices of a given function evaluated at the subgraph degree of that vertex. Here we study this problem and its complexity for quadratic functions. In particular, we introduce the critical roots of a graph, and show they define intervals over which the optimal value of the problem, as the quadratic root varies, is convex piecewise affine.

We show that a circuit walk from a given feasible point of a given linear program to an optimal point can be computed in polynomial time using only linear algebra operations and the solution of the single given linear program. We also show that a Graver walk from a given feasible point of a given integer program to an optimal point is polynomial time computable using an integer programming oracle, but without such an oracle, it is hard to compute such a walk even if an optimal solution to the given program is given as well. Combining our oracle algorithm with recent results on sparse integer programming, we also show that Graver walks from any point are polynomial time computable over matrices of bounded tree-depth and subdeterminants.

The degree sequence optimization problem is to find a subgraph of a given graph which maximizes the sum of given functions evaluated at the subgraph degrees. Here we study this problem by replacing degree sequences, via suitable nonlinear transformations, by suitable degree enumerators, and we introduce suitable degree enumerator polytopes. We characterize their vertices, that is, the extremal degree enumerators, for complete graphs and some complete bipartite graphs, and use these characterizations to obtain simpler and faster algorithms for optimization over degree sequences for such graphs.

We consider the problem of determining which matrices are permutable to be supmodular. We show that for small dimensions any matrix is permutable by a universal permutation or by a pair of permutations, while for higher dimensions no universal permutation exists. We raise several questions including to determine the dimensions in which every matrix is permutable.

We investigate the following question: how close can two disjoint lattice polytopes contained in a fixed hypercube be? This question stems from various contexts where the minimal distance between such polytopes appears in complexity bounds of optimization algorithms. We provide nearly matching lower and upper bounds on this distance and discuss its exact computation. We also give similar bounds in the case of disjoint rational polytopes whose binary encoding length is prescribed.

We consider the problem of finding a subgraph of a given graph which minimizes the sum of given functions at vertices evaluated at their subgraph degrees. While the problem is NP-hard already when all functions are the same, we show that it can be solved for arbitrary functions in polynomial time over graphs of bounded treewidth. Its complexity remains widely open, in particular over complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs.

To any integer matrix $A$ one can associate a matroid structure consisting of a graph and another integer matrix $A_B$. The connected components of this graph are called bouquets. We prove that bouquets behave well with respect to the $r$--th Lawrence liftings of matrices and we use it to prove that the Markov and Graver complexities of $m\times n$ matrices of rank $d$ may be arbitrarily large for $n\geq 4$ and $d\leq n-2$. In contrast, we show they are bounded in terms of $n$ and the largest absolute value $a$ of any entry of $A$.

We consider the class of {\em separable} $k$-hypergraphs, which can be viewed as uniform analogs of threshold Boolean functions, and the class of {\em equatable} $k$-hypergraphs. We show that every $k$-hypergraph is either separable or equatable but not both. We raise several questions asking which classes of equatable (and separable) hypergraphs enjoy certain appealing characterizing properties, which can be viewed as uniform analogs of the $2$-summable and $2$-monotone Boolean function properties. In particular, we introduce the property of {\em exchangeability}, and show that all these questioned characterizations hold for graphs, multipartite $k$-hypergraphs for all $k$, paving $k$-matroids and binary $k$-matroids for all $k$, and $3$-matroids, which are all equatable if and only if they are exchangeable. We also discuss the complexity of deciding if a hypergraph is separable, and in particular, show that it requires exponential time for paving matroids presented by independence oracles, and can be done in polynomial time for binary matroids presented by such oracles.

A perfect matching in a hypergraph is a set of edges that partition the set of vertices. We study the complexity of deciding the existence of a perfect matching in orderable and separable hypergraphs. We show that the class of orderable hypergraphs is strictly contained in the class of separable hypergraphs. Accordingly, we show that for each fixed $k$, deciding perfect matching for orderable $k$-hypergraphs is polynomial time doable, but for each fixed $k\geq 3$, it is NP-complete for separable hypergraphs.

We consider the {\em vector partition problem}, where $n$ agents, each with a $d$-dimensional attribute vector, are to be partitioned into $p$ parts so as to minimize cost which is a given function on the sums of attribute vectors in each part. The problem has applications in a variety of areas including clustering, logistics and health care. We consider the complexity and parameterized complexity of the problem under various assumptions on the natural parameters $p,d,a,t$ of the problem where $a$ is the maximum absolute value of any attribute and $t$ is the number of agent types, and raise some of the many remaining open problems.

We show that the {\em column sum optimization problem}, of finding a $(0,1)$-matrix with prescribed row sums which minimizes the sum of evaluations of given functions at its column sums, can be solved in polynomial time, either when all functions are the same or when all row sums are bounded by any constant. We conjecture that the more general {\em line sum optimization problem}, of finding a matrix minimizing the sum of given functions evaluated at its row sums and column sums, can also be solved in polynomial time.

The {\em line sum optimization problem} asks for a $(0,1)$-matrix minimizing the sum of given functions evaluated at its row and column sums. We show that the {\em uniform} problem, with identical row functions and identical column functions, and the {\em monotone} problem, over matrices with nonincreasing row and column sums, are polynomial time solvable.

We consider the problem of finding a Young diagram minimizing the sum of evaluations of a given pair of functions on the parts of the associated pair of conjugate partitions. While there are exponentially many diagrams, we show it is polynomial time solvable.

We consider the problem of finding a subgraph of a given graph which maximizes a given function evaluated at its degree sequence. While the problem is intractable already for convex functions, we show that it can be solved in polynomial time for convex multi-criteria objectives. We next consider the problem with separable objectives, which is NP-hard already when all vertex functions are the square. We consider a colored extension of the separable problem, which includes the notorious exact matching problem as a special case, and show that it can be solved in polynomial time on graphs of bounded tree-depth for any vertex functions. We mention some of the many remaining open problems.

Configuration integer programs (IP) have been key in the design of algorithms for NP-hard high-multiplicity problems since the pioneering work of Gilmore and Gomory [Oper. Res., 1961]. Configuration IPs have a variable for each possible configuration, which describes a placement of items into a location, and whose value corresponds to the number of locations with that placement. In high multiplicity problems items come in types, and are represented succinctly by a vector of multiplicities; solving the configuration IP then amounts to deciding whether the input vector of multiplicities of items of each type can be decomposed into a given number of configurations. We make this implicit notion explicit by observing that the set of all input vectors decomposable into configurations forms a monoid, and solving the configuration IP is the Monoid Decomposition problem. Motivated by applications, we enrich this problem in two ways. First, sometimes each configuration additionally has an objective value, yielding an optimization problem of finding a "best" decomposition under the given objective. Second, there are often different types of configurations for different types of locations. The resulting problem is to optimize over decompositions of the input multiplicity vector into configurations of several types, and we call it Multitype Integer Monoid Optimization, or MIMO. We develop fast exact algorithms for various MIMO with few or many location types and with various objectives. Our algorithms build on a novel proximity theorem connecting the solutions of a certain configuration IP to those of its continuous relaxation. We then cast several fundamental scheduling and bin packing problems as MIMOs, and thereby obtain new or substantially faster algorithms for them. We complement our positive algorithmic results by hardness results.

We consider the problem of finding a subgraph of a given graph minimizing the sum of given functions at vertices evaluated at their subgraph degrees. While the problem is NP-hard already for bipartite graphs when the functions are convex on one side and concave on the other, we show that when all functions are convex, the problem can be solved in polynomial time for any graph. We also provide polynomial time solutions for bipartite graphs with one side fixed for arbitrary functions, and for arbitrary graphs when all but a fixed number of functions are either nondecreasing or nonincreasing. We note that the general factor problem and the (l,u)-factor problem over a graph are special cases of our problem, as well as the intriguing exact matching problem. The complexity of the problem remains widely open, particularly for arbitrary functions over complete graphs.

We study the general integer programming problem where the number of variables $n$ is a variable part of the input. We consider two natural parameters of the constraint matrix $A$: its numeric measure $a$ and its sparsity measure $d$. We show that integer programming can be solved in time $g(a,d)\textrm{poly}(n,L)$, where $g$ is some computable function of the parameters $a$ and $d$, and $L$ is the binary encoding length of the input. In particular, integer programming is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $a$ and $d$, and is solvable in polynomial time for every fixed $a$ and $d$. Our results also extend to nonlinear separable convex objective functions. Moreover, for linear objectives, we derive a strongly-polynomial algorithm, that is, with running time $g(a,d)\textrm{poly}(n)$, independent of the rest of the input data. We obtain these results by developing an algorithmic framework based on the idea of iterative augmentation: starting from an initial feasible solution, we show how to quickly find augmenting steps which rapidly converge to an optimum. A central notion in this framework is the Graver basis of the matrix $A$, which constitutes a set of fundamental augmenting steps. The iterative augmentation idea is then enhanced via the use of other techniques such as new and improved bounds on the Graver basis, rapid solution of integer programs with bounded variables, proximity theorems and a new proximity-scaling algorithm, the notion of a reduced objective function, and others. As a consequence of our work, we advance the state of the art of solving block-structured integer programs. In particular, we develop near-linear time algorithms for $n$-fold, tree-fold, and $2$-stage stochastic integer programs. We also discuss some of the many applications of these classes.

We show that deciding if a given vector is the degree sequence of a 3-hypergraph is NP-complete.

The theory of $n$-fold integer programming has been recently emerging as an important tool in parameterized complexity. The input to an $n$-fold integer program (IP) consists of parameter $A$, dimension $n$, and numerical data of binary encoding length $L$. It was known for some time that such programs can be solved in polynomial time using $O(n^{g(A)}L)$ arithmetic operations where $g$ is an exponential function of the parameter. In 2013 it was shown that it can be solved in fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) time using $O(f(A)n^3L)$ arithmetic operations for a single-exponential function $f$. This, and a faster algorithm for a special case of combinatorial $n$-fold IP, have led to several very recent breakthroughs in the parameterized complexity of scheduling, stringology, and computational social choice. In 2015 it was shown that it can be solved in strongly polynomial time using $O(n^{g(A)})$ arithmetic operations. Here we establish a result which subsumes all three of the above results by showing that $n$-fold IP can be solved in strongly polynomial FPT time using $O(f(A)n^3)$ arithmetic operations. In fact, our results are much more general, briefly outlined as follows. - There is a strongly polynomial algorithm for ILP whenever a so-called Graver-best oracle is realizable for it. - Graver-best oracles for the large classes of multi-stage stochastic and tree-fold ILPs can be realized in FPT time. Together with the previous oracle algorithm, this newly shows two large classes of ILP to be strongly polynomial; in contrast, only few classes of ILP were previously known to be strongly polynomial. - We show that ILP is FPT parameterized by the largest coefficient $\|A\|_\infty$ and the primal or dual treedepth of $A$, and that this parameterization cannot be relaxed, signifying substantial progress in understanding the parameterized complexity of ILP.

We introduce and study the problem of optimizing arbitrary functions over degree sequences of hypergraphs and multihypergraphs. We show that over multihypergraphs the problem can be solved in polynomial time. For hypergraphs, we show that deciding if a given sequence is the degree sequence of a 3-hypergraph is NP-complete, thereby solving a 30 year long open problem. This implies that optimization over hypergraphs is hard already for simple concave functions. In contrast, we show that for graphs, if the functions at vertices are the same, then the problem is polynomial time solvable. We also provide positive results for convex optimization over multihypergraphs and graphs and exploit connections to degree sequence polytopes and threshold graphs. We then elaborate on connections to the emerging theory of shifted combinatorial optimization.