arXiv++ Combinatorics

This paper is the second in a series of papers characterizing the maximum packing of \( T \)-cuts in bipartite grafts, following the first paper (N.~Kita, ``Tight cuts in bipartite grafts~I: Capital distance components,'' {arXiv:2202.00192v2}, 2022). Given a graft $(G, T)$, a minimum join $F$, and a specified vertex $r$ called the root, the distance components of $(G, T)$ are defined as subgraphs of $G$ determined by the distances induced by $F$. A distance component is called {\em capital} if it contains the root; otherwise, it is called {\em decapital}. In our first paper, we investigated the canonical structure of capital distance components in bipartite grafts, which can be described using the graft analogue of the Kotzig--Lovász decomposition. In this paper, we provide the counterpart structure for the decapital distance components. We also establish a necessary and sufficient condition for two vertices $r$ and $r'$ under which a decapital distance component with respect to root $r$ is also a decapital distance component with respect to root $r'$. As a consequence, we obtain that the total number of decapital distance components in a bipartite graft, taken over all choices of root, is equal to twice the number of edges in a minimum join of the graft.

This paper is a sequel of our preceding paper (N. Kita: Constructive characterization for signed analogue of critical graphs I: Principal classes of radials and semiradials. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2001.00083, 2019). In the preceding paper, the concepts of radials and semiradials are introduced, and constructive characterizations for five principal classes of radials and semiradials are provided. Radials are a common analogue of critical graphs from matching theory and a class of directed graphs called flowgraphs, whereas semiradials are a relaxed concept of radials. Five classes of radials and semiradials, that is, absolute semiradials, strong and almost strong radials, linear semiradials, and sublinear radials, were defined and characterized in the paper. In this paper, we use these characterizations to provide a constructive characterization of general radials and semiradials.

This paper is the first from a series of papers that provide a characterization of maximum packings of $T$-cuts in bipartite graphs. Given a connected graph, a set $T$ of an even number of vertices, and a minimum $T$-join, an edge weighting can be defined, from which distances between vertices can be defined. Furthermore, given a specified vertex called root, vertices can be classified according to their distances from the root, and this classification of vertices can be used to define a family of subgraphs called {\em distance components}. Sebö provided a theorem that revealed a relationship between distance components, minimum $T$-joins, and $T$-cuts. In this paper, we further investigate the structure of distance components in bipartite graphs. Particularly, we focus on {\em capital} distance components, that is, those that include the root. We reveal the structure of capital distance components in terms of the $T$-join analogue of the general Kotzig-Lovász canonical decomposition.

This paper is a sequel of our previous paper (N. Kita: Bipartite graft {II}: Cathedral decomposition for combs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06678, 2021). In our previous paper, a graft analogue of the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition has been introduced for comb bipartite grafts. In this paper, we prove how this result can be extended for general bipartite grafts.

Factor-critical graphs are a classical concept in matching theory that constitute an important component of the Gallai-Edmonds canonical decomposition and Edmonds' algorithm for maximum matchings. Lovász provided a constructive characterization of factor-critical graphs in terms of ear decompositions. This characterization has been a useful inductive tool for studying factor-critical graphs and also connects them with Edmonds' algorithm. Joins in grafts, also known as $T$-joins in graphs, are a classical variant of matchings proposed in terms of parity. Minimum joins and grafts are generalizations of perfect matchings and graphs with perfect matchings, respectively. Accordingly, graft analogues of fundamental concepts and results from matching theory, such as canonical decompositions, will develop the theory of minimum join. In this paper, we propose a new concept, critical quasicombs, as a bipartite graft analogue of factor-critical graphs and provide a constructive characterization of critical quasicombs using a graft version of ear decompositions. This characterization can be considered as a bipartite graft analogue of Lovász' result. From our results, the Dulmage-Mendelsohn canonical decomposition, originally a theory for bipartite graphs, has been generalized for bipartite grafts.

We provide a canonical decomposition for a class of bipartite grafts known as combs. As every bipartite graft is a recursive combination of combs, our results provides a canonical decomposition for general bipartite grafts. Our new decomposition is by definition a generalization of the classical canonical decomposition in matching theory, that is, the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition for bipartite graphs with perfect matchings. However, it exhibits much more complicated structure than its classical counterpart. It is revealed from our results that bipartite grafts has a canonical structure that is analogous to the cathedral decomposition for nonbipartite graphs with perfect matchings.

We provide an analogue of the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition for a class of grafts known as comb-bipartite grafts. The Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition in matching theory is a classical canonical structure theorem for bipartite graphs. The substantial part of this classical theorem resides in bipartite graphs that are factorizable, that is, those with a perfect matching. Minimum joins in grafts, also known as minimum $T$-joins in graphs, is a generalization of perfect matchings in factorizable graphs. Sebö revealed in his paper that comb-bipartite grafts form one of the two fundamental classes of grafts that serve as skeletons or building blocks of any grafts. Particularly, any bipartite grafts, that is, bipartite counterpart of grafts, can be considered as a recursive combination of comb-bipartite grafts. In this paper, we generalize the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition for comb-bipartite grafts. We also show for this decomposition a property that is characteristics to grafts using the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition for grafts, which is a known graft analogue of another canonical structure theorem from matching theory. This paper is the first from a series of studies regarding bipartite grafts.

This paper is the first from serial papers that provide constructive characterizations for classes of bidirected graphs known as radials and semiradials. In this paper, we provide constructive characterizations for five principle classes of radials and semiradials to be used for characterizing general radials and semiradials. A bidirected graph is a graph in which each end of each edge has a sign $+$ or $-$. Bidirected graphs are a common generalization of digraphs and signed graphs. We define a new concept of radials as a generalization of a classical concept in matching theory, critical graphs. Radials are also a generalization of a class of digraphs known as flowgraphs. We also define semiradials, which are a relaxed concept of radials. We further define special classes of radials and semiradials, that is, absolute semiradials, strong and almost strong radials, linear semiradials, and sublinear radials. We provide constructive characterizations for these five classes of bidirected graphs. Our serial papers are a part of a series of works that establish the strong component decomposition for bidirected graphs.

This paper is the first from a series of papers that establish a generalization of the basilica decomposition for cardinality minimum joins in grafts. Joins in grafts are also known as $T$-joins in graphs, where $T$ is a given set of vertices, and minimum joins in grafts can be considered as a generalization of perfect matchings in graphs provided in terms of parity. The basilica decomposition is a canonical decomposition applicable to general graphs with perfect matchings, and the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition is one of the three central concepts that compose this theory. The classical Kotzig-Lovász decomposition is a canonical decomposition for a special class of graphs known as {\em factor-connected graphs} and is famous for its contribution to the study of the matching polytope and lattice. The general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition is a nontrivial generalization of its classical counterpart and is applicable to general graphs with perfect matchings. As a component of the basilica decomposition theory, the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition has contributed to the derivation of further results in matching theory, such as a characterization of barriers or an alternative proof of the tight cut lemma. In this paper, we present an analogue of the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition for minimum joins in grafts.

This paper is the first from a series of papers that establish a common analogue of the strong component and basilica decompositions for bidirected graphs. A bidirected graph is a graph in which a sign $+$ or $-$ is assigned to each end of each edge, and therefore is a common generalization of digraphs and signed graphs. Unlike digraphs, the reachabilities between vertices by directed trails and paths are not equal in general bidirected graphs. In this paper, we set up an analogue of the strong connectivity theory for bidirected graphs regarding directed trails, motivated by factor theory. We define the new concepts of {\em circular connectivity} and {\em circular components} as generalizations of the strong connectivity and strong components. In our main theorem, we characterize the inner structure of each circular component; we define a certain binary relation between vertices in terms of the circular connectivity and prove that this relation is an equivalence relation. The nontrivial aspect of this structure arises from directed trails starting and ending with the same sign, and is therefore characteristic to bidirected graphs that are not digraphs. This structure can be considered as an analogue of the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition, a known canonical decomposition in $1$-factor theory. From our main theorem, we also obtain a new result in $b$-factor theory, namely, a $b$-factor analogue of the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition.

In matching theory, one of the most fundamental and classical branches of combinatorics, {\em canonical decompositions} of graphs are powerful and versatile tools that form the basis of this theory. However, the abilities of the known canonical decompositions, that is, the {\em Dulmage-Mendelsohn}, {\em Kotzig-Lovász}, and {\em Gallai-Edmonds} decompositions, are limited because they are only applicable to particular classes of graphs, such as bipartite graphs, or they are too sparse to provide sufficient information. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a new canonical decomposition that is applicable to all graphs and provides much finer information. We focus on the notion of {\em factor-components} as the fundamental building blocks of a graph; through the factor-components, our new canonical decomposition states how a graph is organized and how it contains all the maximum matchings. The main results that constitute our new theory are the following: (i) a canonical partial order over the set of factor-components, which describes how a graph is constructed from its factor-components; (ii) a generalization of the Kotzig-Lovász decomposition, which shows the inner structure of each factor-component in the context of the entire graph; and (iii) a canonically described interrelationship between (i) and (ii), which integrates these two results into a unified theory of a canonical decomposition. These results are obtained in a self-contained way, and our proof of the generalized Kotzig-Lovász decomposition contains a shortened and self-contained proof of the classical counterpart.

The Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition is a classical canonical decomposition in matching theory applicable for bipartite graphs, and is famous not only for its application in the field of matrix computation, but also for providing a prototypal structure in matroidal optimization theory. The Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition is stated and proved using the two color classes, and therefore generalizing this decomposition for nonbipartite graphs has been a difficult task. In this paper, we obtain a new canonical decomposition that is a generalization of the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition for arbitrary graphs, using a recently introduced tool in matching theory, the basilica decomposition. Our result enables us to understand all known canonical decompositions in a unified way. Furthermore, we apply our result to derive a new theorem regarding barriers. The duality theorem for the maximum matching problem is the celebrated Berge formula, in which dual optimizers are known as barriers. Several results regarding maximal barriers have been derived by known canonical decompositions, however no characterization has been known for general graphs. In this paper, we provide a characterization of the family of maximal barriers in general graphs, in which the known results are developed and unified.

We establish the theory of the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition for $b$-matchings. The original Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition is a classical canonical decomposition of bipartite graphs, which describes the structures of the maximum $1$-matchings and the dual optimizers, i.e., the minimum vertex covers. In this paper, we develop analogical properties, and thus obtain the structure of the maximum $b$-matchings and characterizes the family of $b$-verifying set.

In deriving their characterization of the perfect matchings polytope, Edmonds, Lovász, and Pulleyblank introduced the so-called {\em Tight Cut Lemma} as the most challenging aspect of their work. The Tight Cut Lemma in fact claims {\em bricks} as the fundamental building blocks that constitute a graph in studying the matching polytope and can be referred to as a key result in this field. Even though the Tight Cut Lemma is a matching \textup{(}$1$-matching\textup{)} theoretic statement that consists of purely graph theoretic concepts, the known proofs either employ a linear programming argument or are established upon results regarding a substantially wider notion than matchings. This paper presents a new proof of the Tight Cut Lemma, which attains both of the two reasonable features for the first time, namely, being {\em purely graph theoretic} as well as {\em purely matching theory closed}. Our proof uses, as the only preliminary result, the canonical decomposition recently introduced by Kita. By further developing this canonical decomposition, we acquire a new device of {\em towers} to analyze the structure of bricks, and thus prove the Tight Cut Lemma. We believe that our new proof of the Tight Cut Lemma provides a highly versatile example of how to handle bricks.

A graph $G$ with a perfect matching is called saturated if $G+e$ has more perfect matchings than $G$ for any edge $e$ that is not in $G$. Lovász gave a characterization of the saturated graphs called the cathedral theorem, with some applications to the enumeration problem of perfect matchings, and later Szigeti gave another proof. In this paper, we give a new proof with our preceding works which revealed canonical structures of general graphs with perfect matchings. Here, the cathedral theorem is derived in quite a natural way, providing more refined or generalized properties. Moreover, the new proof shows that it can be proved without using the Gallai-Edmonds structure theorem.

Given a graph, a barrier is a set of vertices determined by the Berge formula---the min-max theorem characterizing the size of maximum matchings. The notion of barriers plays important roles in numerous contexts of matching theory, since barriers essentially coincides with dual optimal solutions of the maximum matching problem. In a special class of graphs called the elementary graphs, the family of maximal barriers forms a partition of the vertices; this partition was found by Lovász and is called the canonical partition. The canonical partition has produced many fundamental results in matching theory, such as the two ear theorem. However, in non-elementary graphs, the family of maximal barriers never forms a partition, and there has not been the canonical partition for general graphs. In this paper, using our previous work, we give a canonical description of structures of the odd-maximal barriers---a class of barriers including the maximal barriers---for general graphs; we also reveal structures of odd components associated with odd-maximal barriers. This result of us can be regarded as a generalization of Lovász's canonical partition.

This paper is concerned with structures of general graphs with perfect matchings. We first reveal a partially ordered structure among factor-components of general graphs with perfect matchings. Our second result is a generalization of Kotzig's canonical partition to a decomposition of general graphs with perfect matchings. It contains a short proof for the theorem of the canonical partition. These results give decompositions which are canonical, that is, unique to given graphs. We also show that there are correlations between these two and that these can be computed in polynomial time.