arXiv++ Combinatorics

A brick is a 3-connected graph $G$ such that $G-u-v$ has a perfect matching for any two distinct vertices $u,v\in V(G)$. An edge $e$ in a matching covered graph $G$ is removable if $G-e$ is matching covered. We say that a removable edge $e$ in a brick $G$ is $b$-invariant if $b(G-e)=b(G)=1$, where $b(H)$ denotes the number of bricks in the tight cut decomposition of a matching covered graph $H$. An edge of a graph is solitary if it lies in precisely one perfect matching. Lucchesi and Murty proposed the problem of characterizing bricks, distinct from $K_4$, $\overline{C_6}$ and the Petersen graph, in which every $b$-invariant edge is solitary. Note that every $b$-invariant edge is removable. In this paper, we strengthen the condition by requiring that every removable edge is solitary. We show that every nonsolid brick satisfying this strengthened condition can be obtained by repeatedly splicing odd wheels (up to multiple edges). Moreover, properties of such bricks imply that "repeatedly splicing odd wheels" cannot be replaced by "repeatedly splicing copies of $K_4$".

A connected graph is matching covered if it has at least one edge and every edge lies in some perfect matching.Lovász proved that every matching covered graph G can be uniquely decomposed into a list of bricks and braces up to multiple edges. Denote by b(G) the number of bricks in such a decomposition. An edge e of G is removable if G-e is also matching covered; is b-invariant if e is removable and b(G-e)=b(G). Furthermore, an edge e of G is a forcing edge if it lies in precisely one perfect matching of G. Lucchesi and Murty proposed the problem of characterizing bricks, distinct from K_4, \overline{C_6}, and the Petersen graph, in which every b-invariant edge is a forcing edge. In this paper, we solve this problem for near-bipartite bricks by providing a complete characterization.

An edge of a matching covered graph G is a forcing edge if it lies in precisely one perfect matching of G. A matching covered graph is a brick if and only if it is 3-connected and bicritical (the deletion of each pair of distinct vertices results in a graph with a perfect matching). In this paper, we prove that every vertex of a brick is incident with a forcing edge if and only if the brick is an odd wheel up to multiple edges.

Global forcing number and maximum anti-forcing number of matchable graphs (graphs with a perfect matching) were proposed in completely different situations with applications in theoretical chemistry. Surprisingly for bipartite graphs and some nonbipartite graphs as solid bricks (or Birkhoff-von Neumann graphs) G, the global forcing number gf(G) is at least the maximum anti-forcing number Af(G). It is natural to consider when gf(G) = Af(G) holds. For convenience, we call a matchable graph G strongly uniform if each conformal matchable subgraph G' always satisfies gf(G') = Af(G'). In this article, by applying the ear decomposition theorem and discussing the existence of a Hamilton cycle with positions of chords, we give "excluded conformal minors" and "structural" characterizations of matchable bipartite graphs and Birkhoff-von Neumann graphs that are strongly uniform respectively.

Klein and Randic (1985) proposed the concept of forcing number, which has an application in chemical resonance theory. Let $G$ be a graph with a perfect matching $M$. The forcing number of $M$ is the smallest cardinality of a subset of $M$ that is contained only in one perfect matching $M$. The maximum forcing number of $G$ is the maximum value of forcing numbers over all perfect matchings of $G$. Kleinerman (2006) obtained that the maximum forcing number of $2n\times 2m$ quadriculated torus is $nm$. By improving Kleinerman's approach, we obtain the maximum forcing numbers of all 4-regular quadriculated graphs on torus except one class.

A connected graph G is matching covered if every edge lies in some perfect matching of G. Lovasz proved that every matching covered graph G can be uniquely decomposed into a list of bricks (nonbipartite) and braces (bipartite) up to multiple edges. Denote by b(G) the number of bricks of G. An edge e of G is removable if G-e is also matching covered, and solitary (or forcing) if after the removal of the two end vertices of e, the left graph has a unique perfect matching. Furthermore, a removable edge e of a brick G is b-invariant if b(G-e) = 1. Lucchesi and Murty proposed a problem of characterizing bricks, distinct from K4, the prism and the Petersen graph, in which every b-invariant edge is forcing. We answer the problem for cubic bricks by showing that there are exactly ten cubic bricks, including K4, the prism and the Petersen graph, every b-invariant edge of which is forcing.

In a region R consisting of unit squares, a (domino) tiling is a collection of dominoes (the union of two adjacent squares) which pave fully the region. The flip graph of R is defined on the set of all tilings of R where two tilings are adjacent if we change one from the other by a flip (a 90-degree rotation of a pair of side-by-side dominoes). If R is simply-connected, then its flip graph is connected. By using homology and cohomology, Saldanha, Tomei, Casarin and Romualdo obtained a criterion to decide if two tilings are in the same component of flip graph of quadriculated surface. By a graph-theoretic method, we obtain that the flip graph of a non-bipartite quadriculated torus consists of two isomorphic components. As an application, we obtain that the forcing numbers of all perfect matchings of each non-bipartite quadriculated torus form an integer-interval. For a bipartite quadriculated torus, the components of the flip graph is more complicated, and we use homology to obtain a general lower bound for the number of components of its flip graph.

The global forcing number of a graph G is the minimal cardinality of an edge subset discriminating all perfect matchings of G, denoted by gf(G). For any perfect matching M of G, the minimal cardinality of an edge subset S in E(G)-M such that G-S has a unique perfect matching is called the anti-forcing number of M,denoted by af(G, M). The maximum anti-forcing number of G among all perfect matchings is denoted by Af(G). It is known that the maximum anti-forcing number of a hexagonal system equals the famous Fries number. We are interested in some comparisons between the global forcing number and the maximum anti-forcing number of a graph. For a bipartite graph G, we show that gf(G)is larger than or equal to Af(G). Next we mainly extend such result to non-bipartite graphs, which is the set of all graphs with a perfect matching which contain no two disjoint odd cycles such that their deletion results in a subgraph with a perfect matching. For any such graph G, we also have gf(G) is larger than or equal to Af(G) by revealing further property of non-bipartite graphs with a unique perfect matching. As a consequence, this relation also holds for the graphs whose perfect matching polytopes consist of non-negative 1-regular vectors. In particular, for a brick G, de Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty [4] showed that G satisfying the above condition if and only if G is solid, and if and only if its perfect matching polytope consists of non-negative 1-regular vectors. Finally, we obtain tight upper and lower bounds on gf(G)-Af(G). For a connected bipartite graph G with 2n vertices, we have that 0 \leq gf(G)-Af(G) \leq 1/2 (n-1)(n-2); For non-bipartite case, -1/2 (n^2-n-2) \leq gf(G)-Af(G) \leq (n-1)(n-2).