arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a real matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times n}$ with non-collinear columns, we show that $n \leq O(d^4 κ_A)$ where $κ_A$ is the \emph{circuit imbalance measure} of $A$. The circuit imbalance measure $κ$ is a real analogue of $Δ$-modularity for integer matrices, satisfying $κ_A \leq Δ_A$ for integer $A$. The circuit imbalance measure has numerous applications in the context of linear programming (see Ekbatani, Natura and V{é}gh (2022) for a survey). Our result generalizes the $O(d^4 Δ_A)$ bound of Averkov and Schymura (2023) for integer matrices and provides the first polynomial bound holding for all parameter ranges on real matrices. To derive our result, similar to the strategy of Geelen, Nelson and Walsh (2021) for $Δ$-modular matrices, we show that real representable matroids induced by $κ$-bounded matrices are minor closed and exclude a rank $2$ uniform matroid on $O(κ)$ elements as a minor (also known as a line of length $O(κ)$). As our main technical contribution, we show that any simple rank $d$ complex representable matroid which excludes a line of length $l$ has at most $O(d^4 l)$ elements. This complements the tight bound of $(l-3)\binom{d}{2} + d$ for $l \geq 4$, of Geelen, Nelson and Walsh which holds when the rank $d$ is sufficiently large compared to $l$ (at least doubly exponential in $l$).

We show that any bounded integral function $f : A \times B \mapsto \{0,1, \dots, Δ\}$ with rank $r$ has deterministic communication complexity $Δ^{O(Δ)} \cdot \sqrt{r} \cdot \log r$, where the rank of $f$ is defined to be the rank of the $A \times B$ matrix whose entries are the function values. As a corollary, we show that any $n$-dimensional polytope that admits a slack matrix with entries from $\{0,1,\dots,Δ\}$ has extension complexity at most $\exp(Δ^{O(Δ)} \cdot \sqrt{n} \cdot \log n)$.

In a seminal paper, Kannan and Lovász (1988) considered a quantity $μ_{KL}(Λ,K)$ which denotes the best volume-based lower bound on the covering radius $μ(Λ,K)$ of a convex body $K$ with respect to a lattice $Λ$. Kannan and Lovász proved that $μ(Λ,K) \leq n \cdot μ_{KL}(Λ,K)$ and the Subspace Flatness Conjecture by Dadush (2012) claims a $O(\log(2n))$ factor suffices, which would match the lower bound from the work of Kannan and Lovász. We settle this conjecture up to a constant in the exponent by proving that $μ(Λ,K) \leq O(\log^{3}(2n)) \cdot μ_{KL} (Λ,K)$. Our proof is based on the Reverse Minkowski Theorem due to Regev and Stephens-Davidowitz (2017). Following the work of Dadush (2012, 2019), we obtain a $(\log(2n))^{O(n)}$-time randomized algorithm to solve integer programs in $n$ variables. Another implication of our main result is a near-optimal flatness constant of $O(n \log^{3}(2n))$.

Approximate integer programming is the following: For a convex body $K \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$, either determine whether $K \cap \mathbb{Z}^n$ is empty, or find an integer point in the convex body scaled by $2$ from its center of gravity $c$. Approximate integer programming can be solved in time $2^{O(n)}$ while the fastest known methods for exact integer programming run in time $2^{O(n)} \cdot n^n$. So far, there are no efficient methods for integer programming known that are based on approximate integer programming. Our main contribution are two such methods, each yielding novel complexity results. First, we show that an integer point $x^* \in (K \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)$ can be found in time $2^{O(n)}$, provided that the remainders of each component $x_i^* \mod{\ell}$ for some arbitrarily fixed $\ell \geq 5(n+1)$ of $x^*$ are given. The algorithm is based on a cutting-plane technique, iteratively halving the volume of the feasible set. The cutting planes are determined via approximate integer programming. Enumeration of the possible remainders gives a $2^{O(n)}n^n$ algorithm for general integer programming. This matches the current best bound of an algorithm by Dadush (2012) that is considerably more involved. Our algorithm also relies on a new asymmetric approximate Carathéodory theorem that might be of interest on its own. Our second method concerns integer programming problems in equation-standard form $Ax = b, 0 \leq x \leq u, \, x \in \mathbb{Z}^n$ . Such a problem can be reduced to the solution of $\prod_i O(\log u_i +1)$ approximate integer programming problems. This implies, for example that knapsack or subset-sum problems with polynomial variable range $0 \leq x_i \leq p(n)$ can be solved in time $(\log n)^{O(n)}$. For these problems, the best running time so far was $n^n \cdot 2^{O(n)}$.

One of the prominent open problems in combinatorics is the discrepancy of set systems where each element lies in at most $t$ sets. The Beck-Fiala conjecture suggests that the right bound is $O(\sqrt{t})$, but for three decades the only known bound not depending on the size of the set system has been $O(t)$. Arguably we currently lack techniques for breaking that barrier. In this paper we introduce discrepancy bounds based on Fourier analysis. We demonstrate our method on random set systems. Suppose one has $n$ elements and $m$ sets containing each element independently with probability $p$. We prove that in the regime of $n \geq Θ(m^2\log(m))$, the discrepancy is at most $1$ with high probability. Previously, a result of Ezra and Lovett gave a bound of $O(1)$ under the stricter assumption that $n \gg m^t$.

A well-known theorem of Spencer shows that any set system with $n$ sets over $n$ elements admits a coloring of discrepancy $O(\sqrt{n})$. While the original proof was non-constructive, recent progress brought polynomial time algorithms by Bansal, Lovett and Meka, and Rothvoss. All those algorithms are randomized, even though Bansal's algorithm admitted a complicated derandomization. We propose an elegant deterministic polynomial time algorithm that is inspired by Lovett-Meka as well as the Multiplicative Weight Update method. The algorithm iteratively updates a fractional coloring while controlling the exponential weights that are assigned to the set constraints. A conjecture by Meka suggests that Spencer's bound can be generalized to symmetric matrices. We prove that $n \times n$ matrices that are block diagonal with block size $q$ admit a coloring of discrepancy $O(\sqrt{n} \cdot \sqrt{\log(q)})$. Bansal, Dadush and Garg recently gave a randomized algorithm to find a vector $x$ with entries in $\lbrace{-1,1\rbrace}$ with $\|Ax\|_{\infty} \leq O(\sqrt{\log n})$ in polynomial time, where $A$ is any matrix whose columns have length at most 1. We show that our method can be used to deterministically obtain such a vector.

For bin packing, the input consists of $n$ items with sizes $s_1,...,s_n \in [0,1]$ which have to be assigned to a minimum number of bins of size 1. Recently, the second author gave an LP-based polynomial time algorithm that employed techniques from discrepancy theory to find a solution using at most $OPT + O(\log OPT \cdot \log \log OPT)$ bins. In this paper, we present an approximation algorithm that has an additive gap of only $O(\log OPT)$ bins, which matches certain combinatorial lower bounds. Any further improvement would have to use more algebraic structure. Our improvement is based on a combination of discrepancy theory techniques and a novel 2-stage packing: first we pack items into containers; then we pack containers into bins of size 1. Apart from being more effective, we believe our algorithm is much cleaner than the one of Rothvoss.

A classical theorem of Spencer shows that any set system with n sets and n elements admits a coloring of discrepancy O(n^1/2). Recent exciting work of Bansal, Lovett and Meka shows that such colorings can be found in polynomial time. In fact, the Lovett-Meka algorithm finds a half integral point in any "large enough" polytope. However, their algorithm crucially relies on the facet structure and does not apply to general convex sets. We show that for any symmetric convex set K with measure at least exp(-n/500), the following algorithm finds a point y in K \cap [-1,1]^n with Omega(n) coordinates in {-1,+1}: (1) take a random Gaussian vector x; (2) compute the point y in K \cap [-1,1]^n that is closest to x. (3) return y. This provides another truly constructive proof of Spencer's theorem and the first constructive proof of a Theorem of Gluskin and Giannopoulos.

A popular method in combinatorial optimization is to express polytopes P, which may potentially have exponentially many facets, as solutions of linear programs that use few extra variables to reduce the number of constraints down to a polynomial. After two decades of standstill, recent years have brought amazing progress in showing lower bounds for the so called extension complexity, which for a polytope P denotes the smallest number of inequalities necessary to describe a higher dimensional polytope Q that can be linearly projected on P. However, the central question in this field remained wide open: can the perfect matching polytope be written as an LP with polynomially many constraints? We answer this question negatively. In fact, the extension complexity of the perfect matching polytope in a complete n-node graph is 2^Omega(n). By a known reduction this also improves the lower bound on the extension complexity for the TSP polytope from 2^Omega(n^1/2) to 2^Omega(n).

We consider the bin packing problem with d different item sizes s_i and item multiplicities a_i, where all numbers are given in binary encoding. This problem formulation is also known as the 1-dimensional cutting stock problem. In this work, we provide an algorithm which, for constant d, solves bin packing in polynomial time. This was an open problem for all d >= 3. In fact, for constant d our algorithm solves the following problem in polynomial time: given two d-dimensional polytopes P and Q, find the smallest number of integer points in P whose sum lies in Q. Our approach also applies to high multiplicity scheduling problems in which the number of copies of each job type is given in binary encoding and each type comes with certain parameters such as release dates, processing times and deadlines. We show that a variety of high multiplicity scheduling problems can be solved in polynomial time if the number of job types is constant.

For bin packing, the input consists of n items with sizes s_1,...,s_n in [0,1] which have to be assigned to a minimum number of bins of size 1. The seminal Karmarkar-Karp algorithm from '82 produces a solution with at most OPT + O(log^2 OPT) bins. We provide the first improvement in now 3 decades and show that one can find a solution of cost OPT + O(log OPT * log log OPT) in polynomial time. This is achieved by rounding a fractional solution to the Gilmore-Gomory LP relaxation using the Entropy Method from discrepancy theory. The result is constructive via algorithms of Bansal and Lovett-Meka.

In the store-and-forward routing problem, packets have to be routed along given paths such that the arrival time of the latest packet is minimized. A groundbreaking result of Leighton, Maggs and Rao says that this can always be done in time O(congestion + dilation), where the congestion is the maximum number of paths using an edge and the dilation is the maximum length of a path. However, the analysis is quite arcane and complicated and works by iteratively improving an infeasible schedule. Here, we provide a more accessible analysis which is based on conditional expectations. Like [LMR94], our easier analysis also guarantees that constant size edge buffers suffice. Moreover, it was an open problem stated e.g. by Wiese, whether there is any instance where all schedules need at least (1 + epsilon)*(congestion + dilation) steps, for a constant epsilon > 0. We answer this question affirmatively by making use of a probabilistic construction.

For a polytope P, the Chvatal closure P' is obtained by simultaneously strengthening all feasible inequalities cx <= b (with integral c) to cx <= floor(b). The number of iterations of this procedure that are needed until the integral hull of P is reached is called the Chvatal rank. If P is a subset of [0,1]^n, then it is known that O(n^2 log n) iterations always suffice (Eisenbrand and Schulz (1999)) and at least (1+1/e-o(1))n iterations are sometimes needed (Pokutta and Stauffer (2011)), leaving a huge gap between lower and upper bounds. We prove that there is a polytope contained in the 0/1 cube that has Chvatal rank Omega(n^2), closing the gap up to a logarithmic factor. In fact, even a superlinear lower bound was mentioned as an open problem by several authors. Our choice of P is the convex hull of a semi-random Knapsack polytope and a single fractional vertex. The main technical ingredient is linking the Chvatal rank to simultaneous Diophantine approximations w.r.t. the L1-norm of the normal vector defining P.

The extension complexity of a polytope $P$ is the smallest integer $k$ such that $P$ is the projection of a polytope $Q$ with $k$ facets. We study the extension complexity of $n$-gons in the plane. First, we give a new proof that the extension complexity of regular $n$-gons is $O(\log n)$, a result originating from work by Ben-Tal and Nemirovski (2001). Our proof easily generalizes to other permutahedra and simplifies proofs of recent results by Goemans (2009), and Kaibel and Pashkovich (2011). Second, we prove a lower bound of $\sqrt{2n}$ on the extension complexity of generic $n$-gons. Finally, we prove that there exist $n$-gons whose vertices lie on a $O(n) \times O(n^2)$ integer grid with extension complexity $Ω(\sqrt{n}/\sqrt{\log n})$.

We prove that there are 0/1 polytopes P that do not admit a compact LP formulation. More precisely we show that for every n there is a sets X \subseteq {0,1}^n such that conv(X) must have extension complexity at least 2^{n/2 * (1-o(1))}. In other words, every polyhedron Q that can be linearly projected on conv(X) must have exponentially many facets. In fact, the same result also applies if conv(X) is restricted to be a matroid polytope. Conditioning on NP not contained in P_{/poly}, our result rules out the existence of any compact formulation for the TSP polytope, even if the formulation may contain arbitrary real numbers.

Let A be a matrix, c be any linear objective function and x be a fractional vector, say an LP solution to some discrete optimization problem. Then a recurring task in theoretical computer science (and in approximation algorithms in particular) is to obtain an integral vector y such that Ax is roughly Ay and c*y exceeds c*x by only a moderate factor. We give a new randomized rounding procedure for this task, provided that A has bounded Delta-approximate entropy. This property means that for uniformly chosen random signs chi(j) in {-1,+1} on any subset of the columns, the outcome A*chi can be approximately described using a sub-linear number of bits in expectation. To achieve this result, we modify well-known techniques from the field of discrepancy theory, especially we rely on Beck's entropy method, which to the best of our knowledge has never been used before in the context of approximation algorithms. Our result can be made constructive using the Bansal framework based on semidefinite programming. We demonstrate the versatility of our procedure by rounding fractional solutions to column-based linear programs for some generalizations of Bin Packing. For example we obtain a polynomial time OPT + O(log^2 OPT) approximation for Bin Packing With Rejection and the first AFPTAS for the Train Delivery problem.

A colouring of a hypergraph's vertices is polychromatic if every hyperedge contains at least one vertex of each colour; the polychromatic number is the maximum number of colours in such a colouring. Its dual, the cover-decomposition number, is the maximum number of disjoint hyperedge-covers. In geometric hypergraphs, there is extensive work on lower-bounding these numbers in terms of their trivial upper bounds (minimum hyperedge size and degree); our goal here is to broaden the study beyond geometric settings. We obtain algorithms yielding near-tight bounds for three families of hypergraphs: bounded hyperedge size, paths in trees, and bounded VC-dimension. This reveals that discrepancy theory and iterated linear program relaxation are useful for cover-decomposition. Finally, we discuss the generalization of cover-decomposition to sensor cover.

A well studied special case of bin packing is the 3-partition problem, where n items of size > 1/4 have to be packed in a minimum number of bins of capacity one. The famous Karmarkar-Karp algorithm transforms a fractional solution of a suitable LP relaxation for this problem into an integral solution that requires at most O(log n) additional bins. The three-permutations-problem of Beck is the following. Given any 3 permutations on n symbols, color the symbols red and blue, such that in any interval of any of those permutations, the number of red and blue symbols is roughly the same. The necessary difference is called the discrepancy. We establish a surprising connection between bin packing and Beck's problem: The additive integrality gap of the 3-partition linear programming relaxation can be bounded by the discrepancy of 3 permutations. Reversely, making use of a recent example of 3 permutations, for which a discrepancy of Omega(log n) is necessary, we prove the following: The O(log^2 n) upper bound on the additive gap for bin packing with arbitrary item sizes cannot be improved by any technique that is based on rounding up items. This lower bound holds for a large class of algorithms including the Karmarkar-Karp procedure.