arXiv++ Combinatorics

In a convex n-gon, let d[1] > d[2] > ... denote the set of all distances between pairs of vertices, and let m[i] be the number of pairs of vertices at distance d[i] from one another. Erdos, Lovasz, and Vesztergombi conjectured that m[1] + ... + m[k] <= k*n. Using a new computational approach, we prove their conjecture when k <= 4 and n is large; we also make some progress for arbitrary k by proving that m[1] + ... + m[k] <= (2k-1)n. Our main approach revolves around a few known facts about distances, together with a computer program that searches all distance configurations of two disjoint convex hull intervals up to some finite size. We thereby obtain other new bounds such as m[3] <= 3n/2 for large n.

A colouring of a hypergraph's vertices is polychromatic if every hyperedge contains at least one vertex of each colour; the polychromatic number is the maximum number of colours in such a colouring. Its dual, the cover-decomposition number, is the maximum number of disjoint hyperedge-covers. In geometric hypergraphs, there is extensive work on lower-bounding these numbers in terms of their trivial upper bounds (minimum hyperedge size and degree); our goal here is to broaden the study beyond geometric settings. We obtain algorithms yielding near-tight bounds for three families of hypergraphs: bounded hyperedge size, paths in trees, and bounded VC-dimension. This reveals that discrepancy theory and iterated linear program relaxation are useful for cover-decomposition. Finally, we discuss the generalization of cover-decomposition to sensor cover.

The inverse degree of a graph is the sum of the reciprocals of the degrees of its vertices. We prove that in any connected planar graph, the diameter is at most 5/2 times the inverse degree, and that this ratio is tight. To develop a crucial surgery method, we begin by proving the simpler related upper bounds (4(V-1)-E)/3 and 4V^2/3E on the diameter (for connected planar graphs), which are also tight.

Recently Byrka, Grandoni, Rothvoss and Sanita (at STOC 2010) gave a 1.39-approximation for the Steiner tree problem, using a hypergraph-based linear programming relaxation. They also upper-bounded its integrality gap by 1.55. We describe a shorter proof of the same integrality gap bound, by applying some of their techniques to a randomized loss-contracting algorithm.

In the k-edge-connected spanning subgraph problem we are given a graph (V, E) and costs for each edge, and want to find a minimum-cost subset F of E such that (V, F) is k-edge-connected. We show there is a constant eps > 0 so that for all k > 1, finding a (1 + eps)-approximation for k-ECSS is NP-hard, establishing a gap between the unit-cost and general-cost versions. Next, we consider the multi-subgraph cousin of k-ECSS, in which we purchase a multi-subset F of E, with unlimited parallel copies available at the same cost as the original edge. We conjecture that a (1 + Theta(1/k))-approximation algorithm exists, and we describe an approach based on graph decompositions applied to its natural linear programming (LP) relaxation. The LP is essentially equivalent to the Held-Karp LP for TSP and the undirected LP for Steiner tree. We give a family of extreme points for the LP which are more complex than those previously known.

An edge colouring of a multigraph can be thought of as a partition of the edges into matchings (a matching meets each vertex at most once). Analogously, an edge cover colouring is a partition of the edges into edge covers (an edge cover meets each vertex at least once). We aim to determine a tight lower bound on the maximum number of parts in an edge cover colouring as a function of the minimum degree delta, which would be an analogue of Shannon's theorem from 1949 on edge-colouring multigraphs. We are able to give a lower bound that is tight except when delta=9 or delta is odd and > 12; in these non-tight cases the best upper and lower bounds differ by one.