arXiv++ Combinatorics

We prove that there exist functions $f:\mathbb N^2\to\mathbb N$ and $g:\mathbb N\to\mathbb N$ such that for all positive integers $k$, $d$, and $\ell\ge3$, every graph $G$ either contains $k$ cycles of length at least $\ell$ that are pairwise at distance greater than $d$, or admits a subset of vertices $X$ with $|X|\le f(k,\ell)$ such that $G-B_G(X,g(d))$ contains no cycle of length at least $\ell$, where $B_G(X,r)$ denotes the ball of radius $r$ around $X$. This generalizes a theorem of Dujmović, Joret, Micek, and Morin (2024), which established the $\ell=3$ case. Moreover, we prove that the theorem holds with $f(k,\ell)\in\mathcal{O}(\ell k\log k)$ and $g(d)\in\mathcal{O}(d)$. The linear bound on $g$ is best possible, while the bound on $f$ is optimal as a function of $k$ for every fixed $\ell$. In particular, for $\ell=3$ our result improves the previous bound of $\mathcal{O}(k^{18}\mathsf{polylog} k)$ by Dujmović et al.

A $k$-edge-coloured graph is colour-balanced if each colour appears equally often. Resolving a conjecture of Pardey and Rautenbach, we show that any colour-balanced $k$-edge-coloured complete graph $K_{2kt}$ contains a perfect matching that can be made colour-balanced by recolouring $O(k^2)$ edges. More generally, we obtain analogous bounds for arbitrary bounded-degree spanning subgraphs of edge-coloured complete graphs and for perfect matchings in edge-coloured $r$-uniform complete hypergraphs in a more general vector-label setting. The former result answers a question recently posed by Banerjee and Hollom, and significantly improves earlier bounds for all previously studied classes of subgraph. Our proofs reduce each of these problems to a setting in which we can apply a bound for perfect matchings in the complete bipartite graph, established via a linear relaxation and a necklace-splitting argument.

A classical result by Otter shows that the complete graph has an exponential number of non-isomorphic spanning trees. This was recently extended by Lee to every almost regular graph of sufficiently large degree. In this paper, we consider graphs of large minimum degree. We show that every connected graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and minimum degree $d$ has at least $n^{Ω(d)}$ non-isomorphic spanning trees. This is tight up to the constant factor in the exponent. In fact, we prove the following anticoncentration result: if $\mathcal{T}$ is a uniformly random spanning tree of $G$, then for every tree $T$, the probability that $\mathcal{T}$ is isomorphic to $T$ is at most $n^{-Ω(d)}$. This proves a conjecture of Lee in a strong form.

We study the typical structure of games in terms of their connectivity properties. A game is said to be `connected' if it has a pure Nash equilibrium and the property that there is a best-response path from every action profile which is not a pure Nash equilibrium to every pure Nash equilibrium, and it is generic if it has no indifferences. In previous work we showed that, among all $n$-player $k$-action generic games that admit a pure Nash equilibrium, the fraction that are connected tends to $1$ as $n$ gets sufficiently large relative to $k$. The present paper considers the large-$k$ regime, which behaves differently: we show that the connected fraction tends to $1-ζ_n$ as $k$ gets large, where $ζ_n>0$. In other words, a constant fraction of many-action games are not connected. However, $ζ_n$ is small and tends to $0$ rapidly with $n$, so as $n$ increases all but a vanishingly small fraction of many-player-many-action games are connected. Since connectedness is conducive to equilibrium convergence we obtain, by implication, that there is a simple adaptive dynamic that is guaranteed to lead to a pure Nash equilibrium in all but a vanishingly small fraction of generic games that have one. Our results are based on new probabilistic and combinatorial arguments which allow us to address the large-$k$ regime that the approach used in our previous work could not tackle. We thus complement our previous work to provide a more complete picture of game connectivity across different regimes.

It is well-known that any finite triangulation possesses a unique maximal Schnyder wood. We introduce Schnyder woods of infinite triangulations, and prove there exists a unique maximal Schnyder wood of any infinite triangulation with finite boundary, and of the uniform infinite half-planar triangulation. Furthermore, the maximal Schnyder wood of the uniform infinite planar triangulation is the limit of maximal Schnyder woods of large finite random triangulations. Several structural properties of infinite Schnyder woods are also described.

For finite graphs, path-width is an interesting and useful concept, but if we extend it to infinite graphs in the most obvious way (by making the indexing path infinite), it does not work nicely. The simplest extension that works nicely is to allow the indexing set to be any totally-ordered set, and then the corresponding decomposition is called a ``line-decomposition'', and the maximum bag size needed is called ``line-width''. In particular, the indexing set need not be a well-order; but the corresponding decomposition would be easier to use if it was. We show that if a graph has line-width at most $k$, it admits a well-ordered line-decomposition with width at most $2k$, and this is best possible.

Menger's theorem tells us that if $S,T$ are sets of vertices in a graph $G$, then (for $k\ge0$) either there are $k+1$ vertex-disjoint paths between $S$ and $T$, or there is a set of $k$ vertices separating $S$ and $T$. But what if we want the paths to be far apart, say at distance at least $c$? One might hope that we can find either $k+1$ paths pairwise far apart, or $k$ sets of bounded radius that separate $S$ and $T$, where the bound on the radius is some $\ell$ that depends only on $k,c$ (the ``coarse Menger conjecture''). We showed in an earlier paper that this is false for all $k\ge 2$ and $c\ge3$. To do so we gave a sequence of finite graphs, counterexamples for larger and larger values of $\ell$ with $k=2$, $c=3$. Our counterexamples contained subdivisions of uniform binary trees with arbitrarily large depth as subgraphs. Here we show that for any binary tree $T$, the coarse Menger conjecture is true for all graphs that contain no subdivision of $T$ as a subgraph, that is, it is true for graphs with bounded path-width (and, further, for graphs with bounded coarse path-width). This is perhaps surprising, since it is false for bounded tree-width.

We show that if a graph $G$ admits a quasi-isometry $φ$ to a graph $H$ of bounded path-width, then we can assign a non-negative integer length to each edge of $H$, such that the same function $φ$ is a quasi-isometry to this weighted version of $H$, with error only an additive constant.

Robertson and Seymour proved that for every finite tree $H$, there exists $k$ such that every finite graph $G$ with no $H$ minor has path-width at most $k$; and conversely, for every integer $k$, there is a finite tree $H$ such that every finite graph $G$ with an $H$ minor has path-width more than $k$. If we (twice) replace ``path-width'' by ``line-width'', the same is true for infinite graphs $G$. We prove a ``coarse graph theory'' analogue, as follows. For every finite tree $H$ and every $c$, there exist $k,L,C$ such that every graph that does not contain $H$ as a $c$-fat minor admits an $(L,C)$-quasi-isonetry to a graph with line-width at most $k$; and conversely, for all $k,L,C$ there exist $c$ and a finite tree $H$ such that every graph that contains $H$ as a $c$-fat minor admits no $(L,C)$-quasi-isometry to a graph with line-width at most $k$.

Menger's theorem says that, for $k\ge0$, if $S, T$ are sets of vertices in a graph $G$, then either there are $k + 1$ vertex-disjoint paths between $S$ and $T$, or there is a set X of at most $k$ vertices such that every $S$-$T$ path passes through $X$. The ``coarse Menger conjecture'' proposed a generalization of Menger's theorem for paths that are far apart: for all $k, c$ there exists $\ell$, such that for every graph $G$ and subsets $S, T \subset V (G)$, either there are $k + 1$ paths between $S$ and $T$, pairwise with distance more than $c$, or there is a set $X \subset V (G)$ of at most $k$ vertices such that every $S$-$T$ path has distance at most $\ell$ from $X$. This is known to be false, but may be true if $G$ is planar. Here we show that it is true if $G$ is planar and all vertices in $S \cup T$ are on the infinite region. In this case, we also obtain a linear-time algorithm to test for the existence of $k+ 1$ paths between $S$ and $T$, pairwise with distance more than $c$.

Coarse graph theory concerns finding 'coarse' analogues of graph theory theorems, replacing disjointness with being far apart. One of the most interesting open questions is to find a coarse analogue of Menger's theorem, which characterizes when there are $k$ vertex-disjoint paths between two given sets $S,T$ of vertices of a graph. We showed in an earlier paper that the most natural such analogue is false, but a weaker statement remained as a popular open question. Here we show that the weaker statement is also false. More exactly, suppose that $S,T$ are sets of vertices of a graph $G$, and there do not exist $k$ paths between $S,T$, pairwise at distance at least $c$. To make an analogue of Menger's theorem, one would like to prove that there must be a small set $X\subseteq V(G)$ such that every $S-T$ path of $G$ passes close to a member of $X$: but how small and how close? In view of Menger's theorem, one would hope for $|X|<k$ and 'close' some function of $k,c$ (and indeed, this was conjectured by Georgakopoulos and Papasoglu, and independently, by Albrechtsen, Huynh, Jacobs, Knappe and Wollan); but we showed that this is false, even if $c=3$ and $k=3$. Here we upgrade the counterexample: we show that, even if $c=k=3$, no pair of constants (for 'small' and 'close') work. For all $\ell, m$, there is a graph $G$ and $S,T\subseteq V(G)$, such that there do not exist three $S-T$ paths pairwise with distance at least three, and yet there is no $X$ with $|X|\le m$ such that every $S-T$ path passes within distance at most $\ell$ of $X$.

Given a set $A$ of $n$ points (vertices) in general position in the plane, the \emph{complete geometric graph} $K_n[A]$ consists of all $\binom{n}{2}$ segments (edges) between the elements of $A$. It is known that the edge set of every complete geometric graph on $n$ vertices can be partitioned into $O(n^{3/2})$ crossing-free paths (or matchings). We strengthen this result under various additional assumptions on the point set. In particular, we prove that for a set $A$ of $n$ \emph{randomly} selected points, uniformly distributed in $[0,1]^2$, with probability tending to $1$ as $n\rightarrow\infty$, the edge set of $K_n[A]$ can be covered by $O(n\log n)$ crossing-free paths and by $O(n\sqrt{\log n})$ crossing-free matchings. On the other hand, we construct $n$-element point sets such that covering the edge set of $K_n[A]$ requires a quadratic number of monotone paths.

A graph $G$ is $H$-induced-saturated if $G$ is $H$-free but deleting any edge or adding any edge creates an induced copy of $H$. There are non-trivial graphs $H$, such as $P_4$, for which no finite $H$-induced-saturated graph $G$ exists. We show that for every finite graph $H$ that is not a clique or an independent set, there always exists a countable $H$-induced-saturated graph. In fact, we show that a far stronger property can be achieved: there is a countably infinite $H$-free graph $G$ such that any graph $G'\ne G$ obtained by making a locally finite set of changes to $G$ contains a copy of $H$.

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a set of subsets of a set $W$. When is there a tree $T$ with vertex set $W$ such that each member of $\mathcal{F}$ is the set of vertices of a subtree of $T$? It is necessary that $\mathcal{F}$ has the Helly property and the intersection graph of $\mathcal{F}$ is chordal. We will show that these two necessary conditions are together sufficient in the finite case, and more generally, they are sufficient if no element of $W$ belongs to infinitely many infinite sets in $\mathcal{F}$.

Consider a `dense' Erdős--Rényi random graph model $G=G_{n,M}$ with $n$ vertices and $M$ edges, where we assume the edge density $M/\binom{n}{2}$ is bounded away from 0 and 1. Fix $k=k(n)$ with $k/n$ bounded away from 0 and~1, and let $S$ be a random subset of size $k$ of the vertices of $G$. We show that with probability $1-\exp(-n^{Ω(1)})$, $G$ satisfies both a central limit theorem and a local limit theorem for the empirical distribution of the edge count $e(G[S])$ of the subgraph of $G$ induced by $S$, where the distribution is over uniform random choices of the $k$-set $S$.

Benjamini, Kalifa and Tzalik recently proved that there is an absolute constant $c>0$ such that any graph with at most $c\cdot2^d/d$ edges and no isolated vertices is a minor of the $d$-dimensional hypercube $Q_d$, while there is an absolute constant $K > 0$ such that $Q_d$ is not $(K\cdot2^d/\sqrt{d})$-minor-universal. We show that $Q_d$ does not contain 3-uniform expander graphs with $C\cdot2^d/d$ edges as minors. This matches the lower bound up to a constant factor and answers one of their questions.

In this paper, we develop a coarse analogue of treewidth. We prove that a graph $G$ admits a tree-decomposition in which each bag is contained in the union of a bounded number of balls of bounded radius, if and only if $G$ admits a quasi-isometry to a graph with bounded tree-width. (The ``if'' half is easy, but the ``only if'' half is challenging.) This generalizes a recent result of Berger and Seymour, concerning tree-decompositions when each bag has bounded radius.

When $H$ is a forest, the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture implies that every graph $G$ with no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$ and with bounded clique number has a stable set of linear size. We cannot prove that, but we prove that every such graph $G$ has a stable set of size $|G|^{1-o(1)}$. If $H$ is not a forest, there need not be such a stable set. Second, we prove that when $H$ is a ``multibroom'', there {\em is} a stable set of linear size. As a consequence, we deduce that all multibrooms satisfy a ``fractional colouring'' version of the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture. Finally, we discuss extensions of our results to the multicolour setting.

We prove that for every complete graph $K_t$, all graphs $G$ with no induced subgraph isomorphic to a subdivision of $K_t$ have a stable subset of size at least $|G|/{\rm polylog}|G|$. This is close to best possible, because for $t\ge 7$, not all such graphs $G$ have a stable set of linear size, even if $G$ is triangle-free.

A {\em $k$-kernel} in a digraph $G$ is a stable set $X$ of vertices such that every vertex of $G$ can be joined from $X$ by a directed path of length at most $k$. We prove three results about $k$-kernels. First, it was conjectured by Erdős and Székely in 1976 that every digraph $G$ with no source has a 2-kernel $|K|$ with $|K|\le |G|/2$. We prove this conjecture when $G$ is a ``split digraph'' (that is, its vertex set can be partitioned into a tournament and a stable set), improving a result of Langlois et al., who proved that every split digraph $G$ with no source has a 2-kernel of size at most $2|G|/3$. Second, the Erdős-Székely conjecture implies that in every digraph $G$ there is a 2-kernel $K$ such that the union of $K$ and its out-neighbours has size at least $|G|/2$. We prove that this is true if $V(G)$ can be partitioned into a tournament and an acyclic set. Third, in a recent paper, Spiro asked whether, for all $k\ge 3$, every strongly-connected digraph $G$ has a $k$-kernel of size at most about $|G|/(k+1)$. This remains open, but we prove that there is one of size at most about $|G|/(k-1)$.