arXiv++ Combinatorics

A digraph $H$ is a ``semi-strong minor'' of another, $G$, if a subdivision of $H$ can be obtained from a subdigraph of $G$ by contracting strongly-connected subdigraphs to single vertices. We will define a width measure of ``plane'' digraphs (that is, drawn in the plane) based on a kind of branch-composition, and show that for every plane digraph $H$, all plane digraphs not containing $H$ as a semi-strong minor have bounded width, while plane digraphs in general have unbounded width.

A digraph $G$ is weightable if its edges can be weighted with real numbers such that the total weight in each directed cycle equals 1. There are several equivalent conditions: that $G$ admits a 0/1-weighting with the same property, or that $G$ contains no subdivided "double-cycle" as a subdigraph, or that for every triple of vertices, all directed cycles containing all three pass through them in the same cyclic order. And there is quite a rich supply of such digraphs: for instance, any digraph drawn in the plane such that each of its directed cycles rotates clockwise around the origin is weightable (let us call such digraphs "circular"), and there are weightable planar digraphs with much more complicated structure than this. Until now the general structure of weightable digraphs was not known, and that is our objective in this paper. We will show that: - there is a construction that builds every planar weightable digraph from circular digraphs; and - there is a (different) construction that builds every weightable digraph from planar ones. We derive a poly-time algorithm to test if a digraph is weightable.

For finite graphs, path-width is an interesting and useful concept, but if we extend it to infinite graphs in the most obvious way (by making the indexing path infinite), it does not work nicely. The simplest extension that works nicely is to allow the indexing set to be any totally-ordered set, and then the corresponding decomposition is called a ``line-decomposition'', and the maximum bag size needed is called ``line-width''. In particular, the indexing set need not be a well-order; but the corresponding decomposition would be easier to use if it was. We show that if a graph has line-width at most $k$, it admits a well-ordered line-decomposition with width at most $2k$, and this is best possible.

Menger's theorem tells us that if $S,T$ are sets of vertices in a graph $G$, then (for $k\ge0$) either there are $k+1$ vertex-disjoint paths between $S$ and $T$, or there is a set of $k$ vertices separating $S$ and $T$. But what if we want the paths to be far apart, say at distance at least $c$? One might hope that we can find either $k+1$ paths pairwise far apart, or $k$ sets of bounded radius that separate $S$ and $T$, where the bound on the radius is some $\ell$ that depends only on $k,c$ (the ``coarse Menger conjecture''). We showed in an earlier paper that this is false for all $k\ge 2$ and $c\ge3$. To do so we gave a sequence of finite graphs, counterexamples for larger and larger values of $\ell$ with $k=2$, $c=3$. Our counterexamples contained subdivisions of uniform binary trees with arbitrarily large depth as subgraphs. Here we show that for any binary tree $T$, the coarse Menger conjecture is true for all graphs that contain no subdivision of $T$ as a subgraph, that is, it is true for graphs with bounded path-width (and, further, for graphs with bounded coarse path-width). This is perhaps surprising, since it is false for bounded tree-width.

We show that if a graph $G$ admits a quasi-isometry $φ$ to a graph $H$ of bounded path-width, then we can assign a non-negative integer length to each edge of $H$, such that the same function $φ$ is a quasi-isometry to this weighted version of $H$, with error only an additive constant.

Robertson and Seymour proved that for every finite tree $H$, there exists $k$ such that every finite graph $G$ with no $H$ minor has path-width at most $k$; and conversely, for every integer $k$, there is a finite tree $H$ such that every finite graph $G$ with an $H$ minor has path-width more than $k$. If we (twice) replace ``path-width'' by ``line-width'', the same is true for infinite graphs $G$. We prove a ``coarse graph theory'' analogue, as follows. For every finite tree $H$ and every $c$, there exist $k,L,C$ such that every graph that does not contain $H$ as a $c$-fat minor admits an $(L,C)$-quasi-isonetry to a graph with line-width at most $k$; and conversely, for all $k,L,C$ there exist $c$ and a finite tree $H$ such that every graph that contains $H$ as a $c$-fat minor admits no $(L,C)$-quasi-isometry to a graph with line-width at most $k$.

Menger's theorem says that, for $k\ge0$, if $S, T$ are sets of vertices in a graph $G$, then either there are $k + 1$ vertex-disjoint paths between $S$ and $T$, or there is a set X of at most $k$ vertices such that every $S$-$T$ path passes through $X$. The ``coarse Menger conjecture'' proposed a generalization of Menger's theorem for paths that are far apart: for all $k, c$ there exists $\ell$, such that for every graph $G$ and subsets $S, T \subset V (G)$, either there are $k + 1$ paths between $S$ and $T$, pairwise with distance more than $c$, or there is a set $X \subset V (G)$ of at most $k$ vertices such that every $S$-$T$ path has distance at most $\ell$ from $X$. This is known to be false, but may be true if $G$ is planar. Here we show that it is true if $G$ is planar and all vertices in $S \cup T$ are on the infinite region. In this case, we also obtain a linear-time algorithm to test for the existence of $k+ 1$ paths between $S$ and $T$, pairwise with distance more than $c$.

Coarse graph theory concerns finding 'coarse' analogues of graph theory theorems, replacing disjointness with being far apart. One of the most interesting open questions is to find a coarse analogue of Menger's theorem, which characterizes when there are $k$ vertex-disjoint paths between two given sets $S,T$ of vertices of a graph. We showed in an earlier paper that the most natural such analogue is false, but a weaker statement remained as a popular open question. Here we show that the weaker statement is also false. More exactly, suppose that $S,T$ are sets of vertices of a graph $G$, and there do not exist $k$ paths between $S,T$, pairwise at distance at least $c$. To make an analogue of Menger's theorem, one would like to prove that there must be a small set $X\subseteq V(G)$ such that every $S-T$ path of $G$ passes close to a member of $X$: but how small and how close? In view of Menger's theorem, one would hope for $|X|<k$ and 'close' some function of $k,c$ (and indeed, this was conjectured by Georgakopoulos and Papasoglu, and independently, by Albrechtsen, Huynh, Jacobs, Knappe and Wollan); but we showed that this is false, even if $c=3$ and $k=3$. Here we upgrade the counterexample: we show that, even if $c=k=3$, no pair of constants (for 'small' and 'close') work. For all $\ell, m$, there is a graph $G$ and $S,T\subseteq V(G)$, such that there do not exist three $S-T$ paths pairwise with distance at least three, and yet there is no $X$ with $|X|\le m$ such that every $S-T$ path passes within distance at most $\ell$ of $X$.

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a set of subsets of a set $W$. When is there a tree $T$ with vertex set $W$ such that each member of $\mathcal{F}$ is the set of vertices of a subtree of $T$? It is necessary that $\mathcal{F}$ has the Helly property and the intersection graph of $\mathcal{F}$ is chordal. We will show that these two necessary conditions are together sufficient in the finite case, and more generally, they are sufficient if no element of $W$ belongs to infinitely many infinite sets in $\mathcal{F}$.

Kuratowski's theorem says that the minimal (under subgraph containment) graphs that are not planar are the subdivisions of $K_5$ and of $K_{3,3}$. Here we study the minimal (under subdigraph containment) strongly-connected digraphs that are not planar. We also find the minimal strongly-connected non-outerplanar digraphs and the minimal strongly-connected non-series-parallel digraphs.

In this paper, we develop a coarse analogue of treewidth. We prove that a graph $G$ admits a tree-decomposition in which each bag is contained in the union of a bounded number of balls of bounded radius, if and only if $G$ admits a quasi-isometry to a graph with bounded tree-width. (The ``if'' half is easy, but the ``only if'' half is challenging.) This generalizes a recent result of Berger and Seymour, concerning tree-decompositions when each bag has bounded radius.

We give a construction to build all digraphs with the property that every directed cycle has length three.

Let G be an acyclic digraph, and let a, b, c, d be vertices, where a, b are sources, c, d are sinks, and every other vertex has in-degree and out-degree at least two. In 1985, Thomassen showed that there do not exist disjoint directed paths from a to c and from b to d, if and only if G can be drawn in a closed disc with a, b, c, d drawn in the boundary in order. We give a shorter proof.

When $H$ is a forest, the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture implies that every graph $G$ with no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$ and with bounded clique number has a stable set of linear size. We cannot prove that, but we prove that every such graph $G$ has a stable set of size $|G|^{1-o(1)}$. If $H$ is not a forest, there need not be such a stable set. Second, we prove that when $H$ is a ``multibroom'', there {\em is} a stable set of linear size. As a consequence, we deduce that all multibrooms satisfy a ``fractional colouring'' version of the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture. Finally, we discuss extensions of our results to the multicolour setting.

We prove that for every complete graph $K_t$, all graphs $G$ with no induced subgraph isomorphic to a subdivision of $K_t$ have a stable subset of size at least $|G|/{\rm polylog}|G|$. This is close to best possible, because for $t\ge 7$, not all such graphs $G$ have a stable set of linear size, even if $G$ is triangle-free.

A {\em $k$-kernel} in a digraph $G$ is a stable set $X$ of vertices such that every vertex of $G$ can be joined from $X$ by a directed path of length at most $k$. We prove three results about $k$-kernels. First, it was conjectured by Erdős and Székely in 1976 that every digraph $G$ with no source has a 2-kernel $|K|$ with $|K|\le |G|/2$. We prove this conjecture when $G$ is a ``split digraph'' (that is, its vertex set can be partitioned into a tournament and a stable set), improving a result of Langlois et al., who proved that every split digraph $G$ with no source has a 2-kernel of size at most $2|G|/3$. Second, the Erdős-Székely conjecture implies that in every digraph $G$ there is a 2-kernel $K$ such that the union of $K$ and its out-neighbours has size at least $|G|/2$. We prove that this is true if $V(G)$ can be partitioned into a tournament and an acyclic set. Third, in a recent paper, Spiro asked whether, for all $k\ge 3$, every strongly-connected digraph $G$ has a $k$-kernel of size at most about $|G|/(k+1)$. This remains open, but we prove that there is one of size at most about $|G|/(k-1)$.

The fork is the tree obtained from the claw $K_{1,3}$ by subdividing one of its edges once, and the antifork is its complement graph. We give a complete description of all graphs that do not contain the fork or antifork as induced subgraphs.

A graph is a ``$k$-Kuratowski graph'' if it has exactly $k$ components, each isomorphic to $K_5$ or to $K_{3,3}$. We prove that if a graph $G$ contains no $k$-Kuratowski graph as a minor,then there is a set $X$ of boundedly many vertices such that $G\setminus X$ can be drawn in a (possibly disconnected) surface in which no $k$-Kuratowski graph can be drawn.

We prove that a graph does not contain as a minor a graph formed by 0-, 1-, 2- or 3-summing $k$ copies of $K_5$ or $K_{3,3}$, if and only if it has bounded genus.

In 1972, Mader showed that every graph without a 3-connected subgraph is 4-degenerate and thus 5-colorable}. We show that the number 5 of colors can be replaced by 4, which is best possible.