arXiv++ Combinatorics

The notion of inverse Lyndon word is related to the classical notion of Lyndon word. More precisely, inverse Lyndon words are all and only the nonempty prefixes of the powers of the anti-Lyndon words, where an anti-Lyndon word with respect to a lexicographical order is a classical Lyndon word with respect to the inverse lexicographic order. Each word $w$ admits a factorization in inverse Lyndon words, named the canonical inverse Lyndon factorization $\ICFL(w)$, which maintains the main properties of the Lyndon factorization of $w$. Although there is a huge literature on the Lyndon factorization, the relation between the Lyndon factorization $\CFL_{in}$ with respect to the inverse order and the canonical inverse Lyndon factorization $\ICFL$ has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we address this question and we show how to obtain one factorization from the other via the notion of grouping. This result naturally opens new insights in the investigation of the relationship between $\ICFL$ and other notions, e.g., variants of Burrows Wheeler Transform, as already done for the Lyndon factorization.

Lyndon words have been largely investigated and showned to be a useful tool to prove interesting combinatorial properties of words. In this paper we state new properties of both Lyndon and inverse Lyndon factorizations of a word $w$, with the aim of exploring their use in some classical queries on $w$. The main property we prove is related to a classical query on words. We prove that there are relations between the length of the longest common extension (or longest common prefix) $lcp(x,y)$ of two different suffixes $x,y$ of a word $w$ and the maximum length $\mathcal{M}$ of two consecutive factors of the inverse Lyndon factorization of $w$. More precisely, $\mathcal{M}$ is an upper bound on the length of $lcp(x,y)$. This result is in some sense stronger than the compatibility property, proved by Mantaci, Restivo, Rosone and Sciortino for the Lyndon factorization and here for the inverse Lyndon factorization. Roughly, the compatibility property allows us to extend the mutual order between local suffixes of (inverse) Lyndon factors to the suffixes of the whole word. A main tool used in the proof of the above results is a property that we state for factors $m_i$ with nonempty borders in an inverse Lyndon factorization: a nonempty border of $m_i$ cannot be a prefix of the next factor $m_{i+1}$. The last property we prove shows that if two words share a common overlap, then their Lyndon factorizations can be used to capture the common overlap of the two words. The above results open to the study of new applications of Lyndon words and inverse Lyndon words in the field of string comparison.

We investigate the relation between bifix codes and interval exchange transformations. We prove that the class of natural codings of regular interval echange transformations is closed under maximal bifix decoding.

We prove in this note that, for an alphabet with three letters, the set of first return to a given word in a set satisfying the tree condition is a basis of the free group.

We introduce a class of sets of words which is a natural common generalization of Sturmian sets and of interval exchange sets. This class of sets consists of the uniformly recurrent tree sets, where the tree sets are defined by a condition on the possible extensions of bispecial factors. We prove that this class is closed under maximal bifix decoding. The proof uses the fact that the class is also closed under decoding with respect to return words.

Given a set $F$ of words, one associates to each word $w$ in $F$ an undirected graph, called its extension graph, and which describes the possible extensions of $w$ on the left and on the right. We investigate the family of sets of words defined by the property of the extension graph of each word in the set to be acyclic or connected or a tree. We prove that in a uniformly recurrent tree set, the sets of first return words are bases of the free group on the alphabet. Concerning acyclic sets, we prove as a main result that a set $F$ is acyclic if and only if any bifix code included in $F$ is a basis of the subgroup that it generates.

We describe in this paper a connection between bifix codes, symbolic dynamical systems and free groups. This is in the spirit of the connection established previously for the symbolic systems corresponding to Sturmian words. We introduce a class of sets of factors of an infinite word with linear factor complexity containing Sturmian sets and regular interval exchange sets, namemly the class of tree sets. We prove as a main result that for a uniformly recurrent tree set $F$, a finite bifix code $X$ on the alphabet $A$ is $F$-maximal of $F$-degree $d$ if and only if it is the basis of a subgroup of index $d$ of the free group on $A$.

We prove new results concerning the relation between bifix codes, episturmian words and subgroups offree groups. We study bifix codes in factorial sets of words. We generalize most properties of ordinary maximal bifix codes to bifix codes maximal in a recurrent set $F$ of words ($F$-maximal bifix codes). In the case of bifix codes contained in Sturmian sets of words, we obtain several new results. Let $F$ be a Sturmian set of words, defined as the set of factors of a strict episturmian word. Our results express the fact that an $F$-maximal bifix code of degree $d$ behaves just as the set of words of $F$ of length $d$. An $F$-maximal bifix code of degree $d$ in a Sturmian set of words on an alphabet with $k$ letters has $(k-1)d+1$ elements. This generalizes the fact that a Sturmian set contains $(k-1)d+1$ words of length $d$. Moreover, given an infinite word $x$, if there is a finite maximal bifix code $X$ of degree $d$ such that $x$ has at most $d$ factors of length $d$ in $X$, then $x$ is ultimately periodic. Our main result states that any $F$-maximal bifix code of degree $d$ on the alphabet $A$ is the basis of a subgroup of index $d$ of the free group on~$A$.