arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by D. Rautenbach

11 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2018-08-29
The matching number of tree and bipartite degree sequences
Published • View PublicationBIB
We study the possible values of the matching number among all trees with a given degree sequence as well as all bipartite graphs with a given bipartite degree sequence. For tree degree sequences, we obtain closed formulas for the possible values. For bipartite degree sequences, we show the existence of realizations with a restricted structure, which allows to derive an analogue of the Gale-Ryser Theorem characterizing bipartite degree sequences. More precisely, we show that a bipartite degree sequence has a realization with a certain matching number if and only if a cubic number of inequalities similar to those in the Gale-Ryser Theorem are satisfied. For tree degree sequences as well as for bipartite degree sequences, the possible values of the matching number form intervals.
2018-07-24
On the equality of the induced matching number and the uniquely restricted matching number for subcubic graphs
For a matching $M$ in a graph $G$, let $G(M)$ be the subgraph of $G$ induced by the vertices of $G$ that are incident with an edge in $M$. The matching $M$ is induced, if $G(M)$ is $1$-regular, and $M$ is uniquely restricted, if $M$ is the unique perfect matching of $G(M)$. The induced matching number $ν_s(G)$ of $G$ is the largest size of an induced matching in $G$, and the uniquely restricted matching number $ν_{ur}(G)$ of $G$ is the largest size of a uniquely restricted matching in $G$. Golumbic, Hirst, and Lewenstein (Uniquely restricted matchings, Algorithmica 31 (2001) 139-154) posed the problem to characterize the graphs $G$ with $ν_s(G)=ν_{ur}(G)$. We give a complete characterization of the $2$-connected subcubic graphs $G$ of sufficiently large order with $ν_s(G)=ν_{ur}(G)$. As a consequence, we are able to show that the subcubic graphs $G$ with $ν_s(G)=ν_{ur}(G)$ can be recognized in polynomial time.
2018-06-27 v2
On the maximum number of maximum independent sets in connected graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
We characterize the connected graphs of given order $n$ and given independence number $α$ that maximize the number of maximum independent sets. For $3\leq α\leq n/2$, there is a unique such graph that arises from the disjoint union of $α$ cliques of orders $\left\lceil\frac{n}α\right\rceil$ and $\left\lfloor\frac{n}α\right\rfloor$, by selecting a vertex $x$ in a largest clique and adding an edge between $x$ and a vertex in each of the remaining $α-1$ cliques. Our result confirms a conjecture of Derikvand and Oboudi [On the number of maximum independent sets of graphs, Transactions on Combinatorics 3 (2014) 29-36].
2018-04-06
On the extremal graphs for degenerate subsets, dynamic monopolies, and partial incentives
Published • View PublicationBIB
The famous lower bound $α(G)\geq \sum_{u\in V(G)}\frac{1}{d_G(u)+1}$ on the independence number $α(G)$ of a graph $G$ due to Caro and Wei is known to be tight if and only if the components of $G$ are cliques, and has been generalized several times in the context of large degenerate subsets and small dynamic monopolies. We characterize the extremal graphs for a generalization due to Ackerman, Ben-Zwi, and Wolfovitz. Furthermore, we give a simple proof of a related bound concerning partial incentives due to Cordasco, Gargano, Rescigno, and Vaccaro, and also characterize the corresponding extremal graphs.
2018-03-31 v2
On the maximum number of minimum dominating sets in forests
Published • View PublicationBIB
Fricke, Hedetniemi, Hedetniemi, and Hutson asked whether every tree with domination number $γ$ has at most $2^γ$ minimum dominating sets. Bien gave a counterexample, which allows to construct forests with domination number $γ$ and $2.0598^γ$ minimum dominating sets. We show that every forest with domination number $γ$ has at most $2.4606^γ$ minimum dominating sets, and that every tree with independence number $α$ has at most $2^{α-1}+1$ maximum independent sets.
2018-03-29 v2
Some bounds on the uniquely restricted matching number
A matching in a graph is uniquely restricted if no other matching covers exactly the same set of vertices. We establish tight lower bounds on the maximum size of a uniquely restricted matching in terms of order, size, and maximum degree.
2017-12-12
On some Graphs with a Unique Perfect Matching
Published • View PublicationBIB
We show that deciding whether a given graph $G$ of size $m$ has a unique perfect matching as well as finding that matching, if it exists, can be done in time $O(m)$ if $G$ is either a cograph, or a split graph, or an interval graph, or claw-free. Furthermore, we provide a constructive characterization of the claw-free graphs with a unique perfect matching.
2017-10-27
A lower bound on the acyclic matching number of subcubic graphs
The acyclic matching number of a graph $G$ is the largest size of an acyclic matching in $G$, that is, a matching $M$ in $G$ such that the subgraph of $G$ induced by the vertices incident to an edge in $M$ is a forest. We show that the acyclic matching number of a connected subcubic graph $G$ with $m$ edges is at least $m/6$ except for two small exceptions.
2017-10-23
On some hard and some tractable cases of the maximum acyclic matching problem
Three well-studied types of subgraph-restricted matchings are induced matchings, uniquely restricted matchings, and acyclic matchings. While it is hard to determine the maximum size of a matching of each of these types, whether some given graph has a maximum matching that is induced or has a maximum matching that is uniquely restricted, can both be decided efficiently. In contrast to that we show that deciding whether a given bipartite graph of maximum degree at most four has a maximum matching that is acyclic is NP-complete. Furthermore, we show that maximum weight acyclic matchings can be determined efficiently for $P_4$-free graphs and $2P_3$-free graphs, and we characterize the graphs for which every maximum matching is acyclic.
2017-05-23
A Short Proof for a Lower Bound on the Zero Forcing Number
We provide a short proof of a conjecture of Davila and Kenter concerning a lower bound on the zero forcing number $Z(G)$ of a graph $G$. More specifically, we show that $Z(G)\geq (g-2)(δ-2)+2$ for every graph $G$ of girth $g$ at least $3$ and minimum degree $δ$ at least $2$.
Equating $k$ Maximum Degrees in Graphs without Short Cycles
For an integer $k$ at least $2$, and a graph $G$, let $f_k(G)$ be the minimum cardinality of a set $X$ of vertices of $G$ such that $G-X$ has either $k$ vertices of maximum degree or order less than $k$. Caro and Yuster (Discrete Mathematics 310 (2010) 742-747) conjectured that, for every $k$, there is a constant $c_k$ such that $f_k(G)\leq c_k \sqrt{n(G)}$ for every graph $G$. Verifying a conjecture of Caro, Lauri, and Zarb (arXiv:1704.08472v1), we show the best possible result that, if $t$ is a positive integer, and $F$ is a forest of order at most $\frac{1}{6}\left(t^3+6t^2+17t+12\right)$, then $f_2(F)\leq t$. We study $f_3(F)$ for forests $F$ in more detail obtaining similar almost tight results, and we establish upper bounds on $f_k(G)$ for graphs $G$ of girth at least $5$. For graphs $G$ of girth more than $2p$, for $p$ at least $3$, our results imply $f_k(G)=O\left(n(G)^{\frac{p+1}{3p}}\right)$. Finally, we show that, for every fixed $k$, and every given forest $F$, the value of $f_k(F)$ can be determined in polynomial time.