arXiv++ Combinatorics

The poset Ramsey number $R(Q_m,Q_n)$ is the smallest integer $N$ such that any blue-red coloring of the elements of the Boolean lattice $Q_N$ has a blue induced copy of $Q_m$ or a red induced copy of $Q_n$. The weak poset Ramsey number $R_w(Q_m,Q_n)$ is defined analogously, with weak copies instead of induced copies. It is easy to see that $R(Q_m,Q_n) \ge R_w(Q_m,Q_n)$. Axenovich and Walzer showed that $n+2 \le R(Q_2,Q_n) \le 2n+2$. Recently, Lu and Thompson improved the upper bound to $\frac{5}{3}n+2$. In this paper, we solve this problem asymptotically by showing that $R(Q_2,Q_n)=n+O(n/\log n)$. In the diagonal case, Cox and Stolee proved $R_w(Q_n,Q_n) \ge 2n+1$ using a probabilistic construction. In the induced case, Bohman and Peng showed $R(Q_n,Q_n) \ge 2n+1$ using an explicit construction. Improving these results, we show that $R_w(Q_m,Q_n) \ge n+m+1$ for all $m \ge 2$ and large $n$ by giving an explicit construction; in particular, we prove that $R_w(Q_2,Q_n)=n+3$.

Let $F = (U,E)$ be a graph and $\mathcal{H} = (V,\mathcal{E})$ be a hypergraph. We say that $\mathcal{H}$ contains a Berge-$F$ if there exist injections $ψ:U\to V$ and $\varphi:E\to \mathcal{E}$ such that for every $e=\{u,v\}\in E$, $\{ψ(u),ψ(v)\}\subset\varphi(e)$. Let $ex_r(n,F)$ denote the maximum number of hyperedges in an $r$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices which does not contain a Berge-$F$. For small enough $r$ and non-bipartite $F$, $ex_r(n,F)=Ω(n^2)$; we show that for sufficiently large $r$, $ex_r(n,F)=o(n^2)$. Let $thres(F) = \min\{r_0 :ex_r(n,F) = o(n^2) \text{ for all } r \ge r_0 \}$. We show lower and upper bounds for $thres(F)$, the uniformity threshold of $F$. In particular, we obtain that $thres(\triangle) = 5$, improving a result of Győri. We also study the analogous problem for linear hypergraphs. Let $ex^L_r(n,F)$ denote the maximum number of hyperedges in an $r$-uniform linear hypergraph on $n$ vertices which does not contain a Berge-$F$, and let the linear unformity threshold $thres^L(F) = \min\{r_0 :ex^L_r(n,F) = o(n^2) \text{ for all } r \ge r_0 \}$. We show that $thres^L(F)$ is equal to the chromatic number of $F$.

Let $c$ denote the largest constant such that every $C_{6}$-free graph $G$ contains a bipartite and $C_4$-free subgraph having $c$ fraction of edges of $G$. Győri et al. showed that $\frac{3}{8} \le c \le \frac{2}{5}$. We prove that $c=\frac{3}{8}$. More generally, we show that for any $\varepsilon>0$, and any integer $k \ge 2$, there is a $C_{2k}$-free graph $G_1$ which does not contain a bipartite subgraph of girth greater than $2k$ with more than $\left(1-\frac{1}{2^{2k-2}}\right)\frac{2}{2k-1}(1+\varepsilon)$ fraction of the edges of $G_1$. There also exists a $C_{2k}$-free graph $G_2$ which does not contain a bipartite and $C_4$-free subgraph with more than $\left(1-\frac{1}{2^{k-1}}\right)\frac{1}{k-1}(1+\varepsilon)$ fraction of the edges of $G_2$. One of our proofs uses the following statement, which we prove using probabilistic ideas, generalizing a theorem of Erdős: For any $\varepsilon>0$, and any integers $a$, $b$, $k \ge 2$, there exists an $a$-uniform hypergraph $H$ of girth greater than $k$ which does not contain any $b$-colorable subhypergraph with more than $\left(1-\frac{1}{b^{a-1}}\right)\left(1+\varepsilon\right)$ fraction of the hyperedges of $H$. We also prove further generalizations of this theorem. In addition, we give a new and very short proof of a result of Kühn and Osthus, which states that every bipartite $C_{2k}$-free graph $G$ contains a $C_{4}$-free subgraph with at least $1/(k-1)$ fraction of the edges of $G$. We also answer a question of Kühn and Osthus about $C_{2k}$-free graphs obtained by pasting together $C_{2l}$'s (with $k>l\ge3$).

Let $La(n,P)$ be the maximum size of a family of subsets of $[n]=\{1,2,...,n\}$ not containing $P$ as a (weak) subposet. The diamond poset, denoted $B_{2}$, is defined on four elements $x,y,z,w$ with the relations $x<y,z$ and $y,z<w$. $La(n,P)$ has been studied for many posets; one of the major open problems is determining $La(n,B_{2})$. Studying the average number of sets from a family of subsets of $[n]$ on a maximal chain in the Boolean lattice $2^{[n]}$ has been a fruitful method. We use a partitioning of the maximal chains and introduce an induction method to show that $La(n,B_{2})\leq(2.20711+o(1))\binom{n}{\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor }$, improving on the earlier bound of $(2.25+o(1))\binom{n}{\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor }$ by Kramer, Martin and Young.

Let $La(n,P)$ be the maximum size of a family of subsets of $[n]= \{1,2, ..., n \}$ not containing $P$ as a (weak) subposet, and let $h(P)$ be the length of a longest chain in $P$. The best known upper bound for $La(n,P)$ in terms of $|P|$ and $h(P)$ is due to Chen and Li, who showed that $La(n,P) \le \frac{1}{m+1} \left(|P| + \frac{1}{2}(m^2 +3m-2)(h(P)-1) -1 \right) {\binom {n} {\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}}$ for any fixed $m \ge 1$. In this paper we show that $La(n,P) \le \frac{1}{2^{k-1}} (|P| + (3k-5)2^{k-2}(h(P)-1) - 1 ) {n \choose {\lfloor n/2\rfloor} }$ for any fixed $k \ge 2$, improving the best known upper bound. By choosing $k$ appropriately, we obtain that $La(n,P) = O\left( h(P) \log_2\left(\frac{|P|}{h(P)}+2\right) \right) {n \choose \lfloor n/2 \rfloor }$ as a corollary, which we show is best possible for general $P$. We also give a different proof of this corollary by using bounds for generalized diamonds. We also show that the Lubell function of a family of subsets of $[n]$ not containing $P$ as an induced subposet is $O(n^c)$ for every $c>\frac{1}{2}$.