arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Darcy Best

8 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2019-12-24
Parity of transversals of Latin squares
Published in Algebr. Comb. 3 (2020), 539-557 • View PublicationBIB
We introduce a notion of parity for transversals, and use it to show that in Latin squares of order $2 \bmod 4$, the number of transversals is a multiple of 4. We also demonstrate a number of relationships (mostly congruences modulo 4) involving $E_1,\dots, E_n$, where $E_i$ is the number of diagonals of a given Latin square that contain exactly $i$ different symbols. Let $A(i\mid j)$ denote the matrix obtained by deleting row $i$ and column $j$ from a parent matrix $A$. Define $t_{ij}$ to be the number of transversals in $L(i\mid j)$, for some fixed Latin square $L$. We show that $t_{ab}\equiv t_{cd}\bmod2$ for all $a,b,c,d$ and $L$. Also, if $L$ has odd order then the number of transversals of $L$ equals $t_{ab}$ mod 2. We conjecture that $t_{ac} + t_{bc} + t_{ad} + t_{bd} \equiv 0 \bmod 4$ for all $a,b,c,d$. In the course of our investigations we prove several results that could be of interest in other contexts. For example, we show that the number of perfect matchings in a $k$-regular bipartite graph on $2n$ vertices is divisible by $4$ when $n$ is odd and $k\equiv0\bmod 4$. We also show that $${\rm per}\, A(a \mid c)+{\rm per}\, A(b \mid c)+{\rm per}\, A(a \mid d)+{\rm per}\, A(b \mid d) \equiv 0 \bmod 4$$ for all $a,b,c,d$, when $A$ is an integer matrix of odd order with all row and columns sums equal to $k\equiv2\bmod4$.
2019-11-14 v2
Small Latin arrays have a near transversal
Published in J. Combin. Des. 29 (2021), 511-527 • View PublicationBIB
A Latin array is a matrix of symbols in which no symbol occurs more than once within a row or within a column. A diagonal of an $n\times n$ array is a selection of $n$ cells taken from different rows and columns of the array. The weight of a diagonal is the number of different symbols on it. We show via computation that every Latin array of order $n\le11$ has a diagonal of weight at least $n-1$. A corollary is the existence of near transversals in Latin squares of these orders. More generally, for all $k\le20$ we compute a lower bound on the order of any Latin array that does not have a diagonal of weight at least $n-k$.
2018-01-09
What did Ryser Conjecture?
Two prominent conjectures by Herbert J. Ryser have been falsely attributed to a somewhat obscure conference proceedings that he wrote in German. Here we provide a translation of that paper and try to correct the historical record at least as far as what was conjectured in it. The two conjectures relate to transversals in Latin squares of odd order and to the relationship between the covering number and the matching number of multipartite hypergraphs.
Covers and partial transversals of Latin squares
Published in Des. Codes Cryptogr. 87 (2019), 1109-1136 • View PublicationBIB
We define a cover of a Latin square to be a set of entries that includes at least one representative of each row, column and symbol. A cover is minimal if it does not contain any smaller cover. A partial transversal is a set of entries that includes at most one representative of each row, column and symbol. A partial transversal is maximal if it is not contained in any larger partial transversal. We explore the relationship between covers and partial transversals. We prove the following: (1) The minimum size of a cover in a Latin square of order $n$ is $n+a$ if and only if the maximum size of a partial transversal is either $n-2a$ or $n-2a+1$. (2) A minimal cover in a Latin square of order $n$ has size at most $μ_n=3(n+1/2-\sqrt{n+1/4})$. (3) There are infinitely many orders $n$ for which there exists a Latin square having a minimal cover of every size from $n$ to $μ_n$. (4) Every Latin square of order $n$ has a minimal cover of a size which is asymptotically equal to $μ_n$. (5) If $1\le k\le n/2$ and $n\ge5$ then there is a Latin square of order $n$ with a maximal partial transversal of size $n-k$. (6) For any $ε>0$, asymptotically almost all Latin squares have no maximal partial transversal of size less than $n-n^{2/3+ε}$.
Transversals in Latin arrays with many distinct symbols
Published in J. Combin. Des. 26 (2018), 84-96 • View PublicationBIB
An array is row-Latin if no symbol is repeated within any row. An array is Latin if it and its transpose are both row-Latin. A transversal in an $n\times n$ array is a selection of $n$ different symbols from different rows and different columns. We prove that every $n \times n$ Latin array containing at least $(2-\sqrt{2}) n^2$ distinct symbols has a transversal. Also, every $n \times n$ row-Latin array containing at least $\frac14(5-\sqrt{5})n^2$ distinct symbols has a transversal. Finally, we show by computation that every Latin array of order $7$ has a transversal, and we describe all smaller Latin arrays that have no transversal.
2013-07-30
Mutually Unbiased Weighing Matrices
Published • View PublicationBIB
Inspired by the many applications of mutually unbiased Hadamard matrices, we study mutually unbiased weighing matrices. These matrices are studied for small orders and weights in both the real and complex setting. Our results make use of and examine the sharpness of a very important existing upper bound for the number of mutually unbiased weighing matrices.
2012-09-20 v2
On unit weighing matrices with small weight
Published • View PublicationBIB
We study the structure of unit weighing matrices of order n and weights 2, 3 and 4. We show that the number of inequivalent unit weighing matrices UW(n,4) depends on the number of decompositions of n into sums of non-negative multiples of some specific positive integers. We also show two interesting sporadic cases in order to show the complexities involved for weights larger than 4.
2012-09-19
Unbiased complex Hadamard matrices and bases
Published in Cryptography and Communications 2(2): 199-209 (2010) • Search Publication
We introduce mutually unbiased complex Hadamard (MUCH) matrices and show that the number of MUCH matrices of order 2n, n odd, is at most 2 and the bound is attained for n = 1,5,9. Furthermore, we prove that certain pairs of mutually unbiased complex Hadamard matrices of order m can be used to construct pairs of unbiased real Hadamard matrices of order 2m. As a consequence we generate a new pair of unbiased real Hadamard matrices of order 36.