arXiv++ Combinatorics

Computing the autotopism group of a partial Latin rectangle can be performed in a variety of ways. This pilot study has two aims: (a) to compare these methods experimentally, and (b) to identify the design goals one should have in mind for developing practical software. To this end, we compare six families of algorithms (two backtracking methods and four graph automorphism methods), with and without the use of entry invariants, on two test suites. We consider two entry invariants: one determined by the frequencies of row, column, and symbol representatives, and one determined by $2 \times 2$ submatrices. We find: (a) with very few entries, many symmetries often exist, and these should be identified mathematically rather than computationally, (b) with an intermediate number of entries, a quick-to-compute entry invariant was effective at reducing the need for computation, (c) with an almost-full partial Latin rectangle, more sophisticated entry invariants are needed, and (d) the performance for (full) Latin squares is significantly poorer than other partial Latin rectangles of comparable size, obstructed by the existence of Latin squares with large (possibly transitive) autotopism groups.

This paper deals with distinct computational methods to enumerate the set $\mathrm{PLR}(r,s,n;m)$ of $r \times s$ partial Latin rectangles on $n$ symbols with $m$ non-empty cells. For fixed $r$, $s$, and $n$, we prove that the size of this set is a symmetric polynomial of degree $3m$, and we determine the leading terms (the monomials of degree $3m$ through $3m-9$) using inclusion-exclusion. For $m \leq 13$, exact formulas for these symmetric polynomials are determined using a chromatic polynomial method. Adapting Sade's method for enumerating Latin squares, we compute the exact size of $\mathrm{PLR}(r,s,n;m)$, for all $r \leq s \leq n \leq 7$, and all $r \leq s \leq 6$ when $n=8$. Using an algebraic geometry method together with Burnside's Lemma, we enumerate isomorphism, isotopism, and main classes when $r \leq s \leq n \leq 6$. Numerical results have been cross-checked where possible.

We define a cover of a Latin square to be a set of entries that includes at least one representative of each row, column and symbol. A cover is minimal if it does not contain any smaller cover. A partial transversal is a set of entries that includes at most one representative of each row, column and symbol. A partial transversal is maximal if it is not contained in any larger partial transversal. We explore the relationship between covers and partial transversals. We prove the following: (1) The minimum size of a cover in a Latin square of order $n$ is $n+a$ if and only if the maximum size of a partial transversal is either $n-2a$ or $n-2a+1$. (2) A minimal cover in a Latin square of order $n$ has size at most $μ_n=3(n+1/2-\sqrt{n+1/4})$. (3) There are infinitely many orders $n$ for which there exists a Latin square having a minimal cover of every size from $n$ to $μ_n$. (4) Every Latin square of order $n$ has a minimal cover of a size which is asymptotically equal to $μ_n$. (5) If $1\le k\le n/2$ and $n\ge5$ then there is a Latin square of order $n$ with a maximal partial transversal of size $n-k$. (6) For any $ε>0$, asymptotically almost all Latin squares have no maximal partial transversal of size less than $n-n^{2/3+ε}$.

A $k$-tuple total dominating set ($k$TDS) of a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices in which every vertex in $G$ is adjacent to at least $k$ vertices in $S$; the minimum size of a $k$TDS is denoted $γ_{\times k,t}(G)$. We give a Vizing-like inequality for Cartesian product graphs, namely $γ_{\times k,t}(G) γ_{\times k,t}(H) \leq 2k γ_{\times k,t}(G \Box H)$ provided $γ_{\times k,t}(G) \leq 2kρ(G)$, where $ρ$ is the packing number. We also give bounds on $γ_{\times k,t}(G \Box H)$ in terms of (open) packing numbers, and consider the extremal case of $γ_{\times k,t}(K_n \Box K_m)$, i.e., the rook's graph, giving a constructive proof of a general formula for $γ_{\times 2, t}(K_n \Box K_m)$.