arXiv++ Combinatorics

Graphlets are subgraphs rooted at a fixed vertex. The number of occurrences of graphlets aligned to a particular vertex, called graphlet degree sequence (gds), gives a topological description of the surrounding of the analyzed vertex. Graphlet degree distribution (gdd) of a graph is a matrix containing graphlet degree sequence for all vertices in the given graph. A long standing open problem called reconstruction conjecture (RC) asks whether the structure of a graph is uniquely determined by the multiset of its vertex-deleted subgraphs. Graphlet degree distribution up to size (n - 1), (<= n - 1)-gdd, gives more information to reconstruct the graph and we use it to reconstruct any graph having a unique almost-asymmetric vertex-deleted subgraph, where almost-asymmetric means that at most one automorphism orbit has size larger than one. Moreover, we prove that any graph containing a vertex-cut of size 1 or any graph of order n having a vertex with degree at most 2 or at least n-2 is reconstructible from its (<= n - 1)-gdd, which expands results shown in the standard RC. We also discuss the relation between gdd and graph connectivity and the conditions on (<= 3)-gdd, whose breaking means that no graph with such gdd exists.

This work deals with undirected graphs that have the same betweenness centrality for each vertex, so-called betweenness uniform graphs (or BUGs). The class of these graphs is not trivial and its classification is still an open problem. Recently, Gago, Coroničová-Hurajová and Madaras conjectured that for every rational $α\ge 3/4$ there exists a BUG having betweenness centrality~$α$. We disprove this conjecture, and provide an alternative view of the structure of betweenness-uniform graphs from the point of view of their complement. This allows us to characterise all the BUGs with betweennes centrality at most 9/10, and show that their betweenness centrality is equal to $\frac{\ell}{\ell+1}$ for some integer $\ell\le 9$. We conjecture that this characterization extends to all the BUGs with betweenness centrality smaller than~1.

Structural convergence is a framework for convergence of graphs by Nešetřil and Ossona de Mendez that unifies the dense (left) graph convergence and Benjamini-Schramm convergence. They posed a problem asking whether for a given sequence of graphs $(G_n)$ converging to a limit $L$ and a vertex $r$ of $L$ it is possible to find a sequence of vertices $(r_n)$ such that $L$ rooted at $r$ is the limit of the graphs $G_n$ rooted at $r_n$. A counterexample was found by Christofides and Král', but they showed that the statement holds for almost all vertices $r$ of $L$. We offer another perspective to the original problem by considering the size of definable sets to which the root $r$ belongs. We prove that if $r$ is an algebraic vertex (i.e. belongs to a finite definable set), the sequence of roots $(r_n)$ always exists.

Nešetřil and Ossona de Mendez recently proposed a new definition of graph convergence called structural convergence. The structural convergence framework is based on the probability of satisfaction of logical formulas from a fixed fragment of first-order formulas. The flexibility of choosing the fragment allows to unify the classical notions of convergence for sparse and dense graphs. Since the field is relatively young, the range of examples of convergent sequences is limited and only a few methods of construction are known. Our aim is to extend the variety of constructions by considering the gadget construction. We show that, when restricting to the set of sentences, the application of gadget construction on elementarily convergent sequences yields an elementarily convergent sequence. On the other hand, we show counterexamples witnessing that a generalization to the full first-order convergence is not possible without additional assumptions. We give several different sufficient conditions to ensure the full convergence. One of them states that the resulting sequence is first-order convergent if the replaced edges are dense in the original sequence of structures.

Betweenness centrality is a centrality measure based on the overall amount of shortest paths passing through a given vertex. A graph is betweenness-uniform if all its vertices have the same betweenness centrality. We study the properties of betweenness-uniform graphs. In particular, we show that every connected betweenness-uniform graph is either a cycle or a $3$-connected graph. Also, we show that betweenness uniform graphs of high maximal degree have small diameter.

Betweenness centrality is a measure of the importance of a vertex x inside a network based on the fraction of shortest paths passing through x. We study a blow-up construction that has been shown to produce graphs with uniform distribution of betweenness. We disprove the conjecture about this procedure's universality by showing that trees with a diameter at least three cannot be transformed into betweenness-uniform by the blow-up construction. It remains open to characterize graphs for which the blow-up construction can produce betweenness-uniform graphs.

We show that the independence number of a countably infinite HH-homogeneous graph that does not contain the Rado graph as a spanning subgraph is finite and present a classification of MB-homogeneous graphs up to bimorphism-equivalence as a consequence.

In~\cite{Hartman:2014}, Hartman, Hubi\v cka and Ma\v sulović studied the hierarchy of morphism extension classes for finite $L$-colored graphs, that is, undirected graphs without loops where sets of colors selected from $L$ are assigned to vertices and edges. They proved that when $L$ is a linear order, the classes $MH_L$ and $HH_L$ coincide, and the same is true for vertex-uniform finite $L$-colored graphs when $L$ is a diamond. In this paper, we explore the same question for countably infinite $L$-colored graphs. We prove that $MH_L=HH_L$ if and only if $L$ is a linear order.

The relational complexity, introduced by G. Cherlin, G. Martin, and D. Saracino, is a measure of ultrahomogeneity of a relational structure. It provides an information on minimal arity of additional invariant relations needed to turn given structure into an ultrahomogeneous one. The original motivation was group theory. This work focuses more on structures and provides an alternative approach. Our study is motivated by related concept of lift complexity studied by Hubicka and Nesetril.

A relational structure is homomorphism-homogeneous (HH-homogeneous for short) if every homomorphism between finite induced substructures of the structure can be extended to a homomorphism over the whole domain of the structure. Similarly, a structure is monomorphism-homogeneous (MH-homogeneous for short) if every monomorphism between finite induced substructures of the structure can be extended to a homomorphism over the whole domain of the structure. In this paper we consider L-colored graphs, that is, undirected graphs without loops where sets of colors selected from L are assigned to vertices and edges. A full classification of finite MH-homogeneous L-colored graphs where L is a chain is provided, and we show that the classes MH and HH coincide. When L is a diamond, that is, a set of pairwise incomparable elements enriched with a greatest and a least element, the situation turns out to be much more involved. We show that in the general case the classes MH and HH do not coincide.