arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study set-defined graph classes: hereditary classes whose vertices are assigned fixed-length numerical tuples, with adjacency determined solely by equality patterns among coordinates. These classes arise in structural graph theory, communication complexity, logic, and adjacency labeling schemes. We ask when they are $χ$-bounded, that is, when chromatic number is bounded in terms of clique number throughout the class. First, we prove a decomposition theorem: every graph in a set-defined class can be partitioned into a number of parts polynomially bounded in its clique number, each inducing a union of a bounded number of shift-colorable graphs, that is, graphs admitting a homomorphism to a shift graph. Thus bounded unions of shift-colorable graphs form the fundamental obstruction to $χ$-boundedness in set-defined classes. For full set-defined classes, consisting of all graphs realizable by a fixed Boolean rule on equality patterns, we prove a stronger dichotomy: every such class is either polynomially $χ$-bounded or contains shift graphs of arbitrarily large chromatic number. Moreover, we provide an algorithm that, given a Boolean-function description of a full set-defined class, decides $χ$-boundedness of the class. It reduces the problem to feasibility of tropical linear programs, and its correctness follows from a duality with winning strategies in mean-payoff games. Conversely, every integer system of tropical inequalities, and hence every mean-payoff game, can be encoded in strongly polynomial time as a set-defined class whose non-$χ$-boundedness is equivalent to feasibility. This provides a graph-theoretic counterpart of tropical feasibility and mean-payoff-game solvability, linking structural graph theory, tropical algebra, and game-theoretic algorithms.

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties, but the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, every $\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}$-free graph has bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for $t=5$ by showing that every $\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most $4\ell$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy.

We ask the question, which oriented trees $T$ must be contained as subgraphs in every finite directed graph of sufficiently large minimum out-degree. We formulate the following simple condition: all vertices in $T$ of in-degree at least $2$ must be on the same 'level' in the natural height function of $T$. We prove this condition to be necessary and conjecture it to be sufficient. In support of our conjecture, we prove it for a fairly general class of trees. An essential tool in the latter proof, and a question interesting in its own right, is finding large subdivided in-stars in a directed graph of large minimum out-degree. We conjecture that any digraph and oriented graph of minimum out-degree at least $k\ell$ and $k\ell/2$, respectively, contains the $(k-1)$-subdivision of the in-star with $\ell$ leaves as a subgraph; this would be tight and generalizes a conjecture of Thomassé. We prove this for digraphs and $k=2$ up to a factor of less than $2$.

A theorem by Ding, Oporowski, Oxley, and Vertigan states that every sufficiently large bipartite graph without twins contains a matching, co-matching, or half-graph of any given size as an induced subgraph. We prove that this Ramsey statement has polynomial dependency assuming bounded VC-dimension of the initial graph, using the recent verification of the Erdős-Hajnal property for graphs of bounded VC-dimension. Since the theorem of Ding et al. plays a role in (finite) model theory, which studies even more restricted structures, we also comment on further refinements of the theorem within this context.

Structural convergence is a framework for convergence of graphs by Nešetřil and Ossona de Mendez that unifies the dense (left) graph convergence and Benjamini-Schramm convergence. They posed a problem asking whether for a given sequence of graphs $(G_n)$ converging to a limit $L$ and a vertex $r$ of $L$ it is possible to find a sequence of vertices $(r_n)$ such that $L$ rooted at $r$ is the limit of the graphs $G_n$ rooted at $r_n$. A counterexample was found by Christofides and Král', but they showed that the statement holds for almost all vertices $r$ of $L$. We offer another perspective to the original problem by considering the size of definable sets to which the root $r$ belongs. We prove that if $r$ is an algebraic vertex (i.e. belongs to a finite definable set), the sequence of roots $(r_n)$ always exists.

Nešetřil and Ossona de Mendez recently proposed a new definition of graph convergence called structural convergence. The structural convergence framework is based on the probability of satisfaction of logical formulas from a fixed fragment of first-order formulas. The flexibility of choosing the fragment allows to unify the classical notions of convergence for sparse and dense graphs. Since the field is relatively young, the range of examples of convergent sequences is limited and only a few methods of construction are known. Our aim is to extend the variety of constructions by considering the gadget construction. We show that, when restricting to the set of sentences, the application of gadget construction on elementarily convergent sequences yields an elementarily convergent sequence. On the other hand, we show counterexamples witnessing that a generalization to the full first-order convergence is not possible without additional assumptions. We give several different sufficient conditions to ensure the full convergence. One of them states that the resulting sequence is first-order convergent if the replaced edges are dense in the original sequence of structures.