arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study set-defined graph classes: hereditary classes whose vertices are assigned fixed-length numerical tuples, with adjacency determined solely by equality patterns among coordinates. These classes arise in structural graph theory, communication complexity, logic, and adjacency labeling schemes. We ask when they are $χ$-bounded, that is, when chromatic number is bounded in terms of clique number throughout the class. First, we prove a decomposition theorem: every graph in a set-defined class can be partitioned into a number of parts polynomially bounded in its clique number, each inducing a union of a bounded number of shift-colorable graphs, that is, graphs admitting a homomorphism to a shift graph. Thus bounded unions of shift-colorable graphs form the fundamental obstruction to $χ$-boundedness in set-defined classes. For full set-defined classes, consisting of all graphs realizable by a fixed Boolean rule on equality patterns, we prove a stronger dichotomy: every such class is either polynomially $χ$-bounded or contains shift graphs of arbitrarily large chromatic number. Moreover, we provide an algorithm that, given a Boolean-function description of a full set-defined class, decides $χ$-boundedness of the class. It reduces the problem to feasibility of tropical linear programs, and its correctness follows from a duality with winning strategies in mean-payoff games. Conversely, every integer system of tropical inequalities, and hence every mean-payoff game, can be encoded in strongly polynomial time as a set-defined class whose non-$χ$-boundedness is equivalent to feasibility. This provides a graph-theoretic counterpart of tropical feasibility and mean-payoff-game solvability, linking structural graph theory, tropical algebra, and game-theoretic algorithms.

We study the Temporal Exploration problem, where an agent must visit all vertices of a temporal graph while traversing at most one available edge per time step. Unlike static graphs, which can be explored in linear time, temporal constraints can substantially increase exploration time even when every snapshot of the graph is connected. To better understand the source of this complexity, we focus on a near-static setting and consider always-connected $k$-edge-deficient temporal graphs, in which each snapshot is connected and differs from a fixed underlying $n$-vertex graph by at most $k$ edges. Although such graphs are structurally close to static graphs, they can still exhibit non-trivial temporal behaviour. Prior work showed that these graphs can be explored in $O(kn \log n)$ time steps and established a lower bound of $Ω(n \log k)$, leaving open whether linear-time exploration in $n$ is possible. We resolve this question by showing that any always-connected $k$-edge-deficient temporal graph admits an exploration schedule of length $O(nk \log k)$. Moreover, given such a temporal graph, the corresponding exploration schedule can be computed in polynomial time. The obtained bound is linear in the number of vertices up to a factor depending only on $k$, removes the extraneous logarithmic dependence on $n$, and is nearly optimal. In particular, for constant $k$, our result yields an order-optimal $Θ(n)$ exploration time, showing that temporal exploration in this near-static regime essentially retains the linear-time character of static graph traversal.

A graph class is monotone if it is closed under taking subgraphs. It is known that a monotone class defined by finitely many obstructions has bounded treewidth if and only if one of the obstructions is a so-called tripod, that is, a disjoint union of trees with exactly one vertex of degree 3 and paths. This dichotomy also characterizes exactly those monotone graph classes for which many NP-hard algorithmic problems admit polynomial-time algorithms. These algorithmic dichotomies, however, do not extend to the universe of all hereditary classes, which are classes closed under taking induced subgraphs. This leads to the natural question of whether we can extend known algorithmic dichotomies for monotone classes to larger families of hereditary classes. We give an affirmative answer to this question by considering the family of hereditary graph classes that are closed under self-intersection, which is known to be located strictly between the monotone and hereditary classes. We prove a new structural characterization of graphs in self-intersection-closed classes excluding a tripod. We use our characterization to give a complete dichotomy of Maximum Independent Set, and its weighted variant for self-intersection-closed classes defined by finitely many obstructions: these problems are in P if the class excludes a tripod and NP-hard otherwise. This generalizes several known results on Maximum Independent Set. We also use it to obtain dichotomies for Maximum Induced Matching on self-intersection-closed classes of bipartite graphs defined by finitely many obstructions. Similarly, we obtain dichotomies for Satisfiability and Counting Satisfiability on self-intersection-closed classes of (bipartite) incidence graphs defined by finitely many obstructions, and for boundedness of clique-width for self-intersection-closed classes of bipartite graphs defined by finitely many obstructions.

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

The Temporal Graph Exploration problem (TEXP) takes as input a temporal graph, i.e., a sequence of graphs $(G_i)_{i\in \mathbb{N}}$ on the same vertex set, and asks for a walk of shortest length visiting all vertices, where the $i$-th step uses an edge from $G_i$. If each such $G_i$ is connected, then an exploration of length $n^2$ exists, and this is known to be the best possible up to a constant. More fine-grained lower and upper bounds have been obtained for restricted temporal graph classes, however, for several fundamental classes, a large gap persists between known bounds, and it remains unclear which properties of a temporal graph make it inherently difficult to explore. Motivated by this limited understanding and the central role of the Temporal Graph Exploration problem in temporal graph theory, we study the problem in a randomised setting. We introduce the Random Spanning Tree (RST) model, which consists of a set of $n$-vertex trees together with an arbitrary probability distribution $μ$ over this set. A random temporal graph generated by the RST model is a sequence of independent samples drawn from $μ$. We initiate a systematic study of the Temporal Graph Exploration problem in such random temporal graphs and establish tight general bounds on exploration time. Our first main result proves that any RST model can, with high probability (w.h.p.), be explored in $O(n^{3/2})$ time, and we show that this bound is tight up to a constant factor. This demonstrates a fundamental difference between the adversarial and random settings. Our second main result shows that if all trees of an RST are subgraphs of a fixed graph with $m$ edges then, w.h.p.\ , it can be explored in $O(m)$ time.

The problem of learning or reconstructing an unknown graph from a known family via partial-information queries arises as a mathematical model in various contexts. The most basic type of access to the graph is via \emph{edge queries}, where an algorithm may query the presence/absence of an edge between a pair of vertices of its choosing, at unit cost. While more powerful query models have been extensively studied in the context of graph reconstruction, the basic model of edge queries seems to have not attracted as much attention. In this paper we study the edge query complexity of learning a hidden bipartite graph, or equivalently its bipartite adjacency matrix, in the classical as well as quantum settings. We focus on learning matchings and half graphs, which are graphs whose bipartite adjacency matrices are a row/column permutation of the identity matrix and the lower triangular matrix with all entries on and below the principal diagonal being 1, respectively. \begin{itemize} \item For matchings of size $n$, we show a tight deterministic bound of $n(n-1)/2$ and an asymptotically tight randomized bound of $Θ(n^2)$. A quantum bound of $Θ(n^{1.5})$ was shown in a recent work of van Apeldoorn et al.~[ICALP'21]. \item For half graphs whose bipartite adjacency matrix is a column-permutation of the $n \times n$ lower triangular matrix, we give tight $Θ(n \log n)$ bounds in both deterministic and randomized settings, and an $Ω(n)$ quantum lower bound. \item For general half graphs, we observe that the problem is equivalent to a natural generalization of the famous nuts-and-bolts problem, leading to a tight $Θ(n \log n)$ randomized bound. We also present a simple quicksort-style method that instantiates to a $O(n \log^2 n)$ randomized algorithm and a tight $O(n \log n)$ quantum algorithm. \end{itemize}

Boolean combinations allow combining given combinatorial objects to obtain new, potentially more complicated, objects. In this paper, we initiate a systematic study of this idea applied to graphs. In order to understand expressive power and limitations of boolean combinations in this context, we investigate how they affect different combinatorial and structural properties of graphs, in particular $χ$-boundedness, as well as characterize the structure of boolean combinations of graphs from various classes.

The functionality of a graph $G$ is the minimum number $k$ such that in every induced subgraph of $G$ there exists a vertex whose neighbourhood is uniquely determined by the neighborhoods of at most $k$ other vertices in the subgraph. The functionality parameter was introduced in the context of adjacency labeling schemes, and it generalises a number of classical and recent graph parameters including degeneracy, twin-width, and symmetric difference. We establish the functionality of a random graph $G(n,p)$ up to a constant factor for every value of $p$.

A graph class admits an implicit representation if, for every positive integer $n$, its $n$-vertex graphs have a $O(\log n)$-bit (adjacency) labeling scheme, i.e., their vertices can be labeled by binary strings of length $O(\log n)$ such that the presence of an edge between any pair of vertices can be deduced solely from their labels. The famous Implicit Graph Conjecture posited that every hereditary (i.e., closed under taking induced subgraphs) factorial (i.e., containing $2^{O(n \log n)}$ $n$-vertex graphs) class admits an implicit representation. The conjecture was recently refuted [Hatami and Hatami, FOCS '22], and does not even hold among monotone (i.e., closed under taking subgraphs) factorial classes [Bonnet et al., ICALP '24]. However, monotone small (i.e., containing at most $n! c^n$ many $n$-vertex graphs for some constant $c$) classes do admit implicit representations. This motivates the Small Implicit Graph Conjecture: Every hereditary small class admits an $O(\log n)$-bit labeling scheme. We provide evidence supporting the Small Implicit Graph Conjecture. First, we show that every small weakly sparse (i.e., excluding some fixed bipartite complete graph as a subgraph) class has an implicit representation. This is a consequence of the following fact of independent interest proved in the paper: Every weakly sparse small class has bounded expansion (hence, in particular, bounded degeneracy). Second, we show that every hereditary small class admits an $O(\log^3 n)$-bit labeling scheme, which provides a substantial improvement of the best-known polynomial upper bound of $n^{1-\varepsilon}$ on the size of adjacency labeling schemes for such classes. This is a consequence of another fact of independent interest proved in the paper: Every small class has neighborhood complexity $O(n \log n)$.

We introduce a dense counterpart of graph degeneracy, which extends the recently-proposed invariant symmetric difference. We say that a graph has sd-degeneracy (for symmetric-difference degeneracy) at most $d$ if it admits an elimination order of its vertices where a vertex $u$ can be removed whenever it has a $d$-twin, i.e., another vertex $v$ such that at most $d$ vertices outside $\{u,v\}$ are neighbors of exactly one of $u, v$. The family of graph classes of bounded sd-degeneracy is a superset of that of graph classes of bounded degeneracy or of bounded flip-width, and more generally, of bounded symmetric difference. Unlike most graph parameters, sd-degeneracy is not hereditary: it may be strictly smaller on a graph than on some of its induced subgraphs. In particular, every $n$-vertex graph is an induced subgraph of some $O(n^2)$-vertex graph of sd-degeneracy 1. In spite of this and the breadth of classes of bounded sd-degeneracy, we devise $\tilde{O}(\sqrt n)$-bit adjacency labeling schemes for them, which are optimal up to the hidden polylogarithmic factor. This is attained on some even more general classes, consisting of graphs $G$ whose vertices bijectively map to the leaves of a tree $T$, where transversal edges and anti-edges added to $T$ define the edge set of $G$. We call such graph representations signed tree models as they extend the so-called tree models (or twin-decompositions) developed in the context of twin-width, by adding transversal anti-edges. While computing the degeneracy of an input graph can be done in linear time, we show that deciding whether its symmetric difference is at most 8 is co-NP-complete, and whether its sd-degeneracy is at most 1 is NP-complete.

Lettericity is a graph parameter responsible for many attractive structural properties. In particular, graphs of bounded lettericity have bounded linear clique-width and they are well-quasi-ordered by induced subgraphs. The latter property implies that any hereditary class of graphs of bounded lettericity can be described by finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs. This, in turn, implies, in a non-constructive way, polynomial-time recognition of such classes. However, no constructive algorithms and no specific bounds on the size of forbidden graphs are available up to date. In the present paper, we develop an algorithm that recognizes $n$-vertex graphs of lettericity at most $k$ in time $f(k)n^3$ and show that any minimal graph of lettericity more than $k$ has at most $2^{O(k^2\log k)}$ vertices.

A class of graphs admits an adjacency labeling scheme of size $b(n)$, if the vertices in each of its $n$-vertex graphs can be assigned binary strings (called labels) of length $b(n)$ so that the adjacency of two vertices can be determined solely from their labels. We give tight bounds on the size of adjacency labels for every family of monotone (i.e., subgraph-closed) classes with a well-behaved growth function between $2^{O(n \log n)}$ and $2^{O(n^{2-δ})}$ for any $δ> 0$. Specifically, we show that for any function $f: \mathbb N \to \mathbb R$ satisfying $\log n \leqslant f(n) \leqslant n^{1-δ}$ for any fixed $δ> 0$, and some~sub-multiplicativity condition, there are monotone graph classes with growth $2^{O(nf(n))}$ that do not admit adjacency labels of size at most $f(n) \log n$. On the other hand, any such class does admit adjacency labels of size $O(f(n)\log n)$. Surprisingly this tight bound is a $Θ(\log n)$ factor away from the information-theoretic bound of $Ω(f(n))$. The special case when $f = \log$ implies that the recently-refuted Implicit Graph Conjecture [Hatami and Hatami, FOCS 2022] also fails within monotone classes. We further show that the Implicit Graph Conjecture holds for all monotone \emph{small} classes. In other words, any monotone class with growth rate at most $n!\,c^n$ for some constant $c>0$, admits adjacency labels of information-theoretic order optimal size. In fact, we show a more general result that is of independent interest: any monotone small class of graphs has bounded degeneracy.We conjecture that the Implicit Graph Conjecture holds for all hereditary small classes.

We show that for any natural number $s$, there is a constant $γ$ and a subgraph-closed class having, for any natural $n$, at most $γ^n$ graphs on $n$ vertices up to isomorphism, but no adjacency labeling scheme with labels of size at most $s \log n$. In other words, for every $s$, there is a small (even tiny) monotone class without universal graphs of size $n^s$. Prior to this result, it was not excluded that every small class has an almost linear universal graph, or equivalently a labeling scheme with labels of size $(1+o(1))\log n$. The existence of such a labeling scheme, a scaled-down version of the recently disproved Implicit Graph Conjecture, was repeatedly raised [Gavoille and Labourel, ESA '07; Dujmović et al., JACM '21; Bonamy et al., SIDMA '22; Bonnet et al., Comb. Theory '22]. Furthermore, our small monotone classes have unbounded twin-width, thus simultaneously disprove the already-refuted Small conjecture; but this time with a self-contained proof, not relying on elaborate group-theoretic constructions.

How to efficiently represent a graph in computer memory is a fundamental data structuring question. In the present paper, we address this question from a combinatorial point of view. A representation of an $n$-vertex graph $G$ is called implicit if it assigns to each vertex of $G$ a binary code of length $O(\log n)$ so that the adjacency of two vertices is a function of their codes. A necessary condition for a hereditary class $X$ of graphs to admit an implicit representation is that $X$ has at most factorial speed of growth. This condition, however, is not sufficient, as was recently shown in [Hatami & Hatami, FOCS 2022]. Several sufficient conditions for the existence of implicit representations deal with boundedness of some parameters, such as degeneracy or clique-width. In the present paper, we analyze more graph parameters and prove a number of new results related to implicit representation and factorial properties.

The domatic number of a graph is the maximum number of vertex disjoint dominating sets that partition the vertex set of the graph. In this paper we consider the fractional variant of this notion. Graphs with fractional domatic number 1 are exactly the graphs that contain an isolated vertex. Furthermore, it is known that all other graphs have fractional domatic number at least 2. In this note we characterize graphs with fractional domatic number 2. More specifically, we show that a graph without isolated vertices has fractional domatic number 2 if and only if it has a vertex of degree 1 or a connected component isomorphic to a 4-cycle. We conjecture that if the fractional domatic number is more than 2, then it is at least 7/3.

Functionality is a graph complexity measure that extends a variety of parameters, such as vertex degree, degeneracy, clique-width, or twin-width. In the present paper, we show that functionality is bounded for box intersection graphs in $\mathbb{R}^1$, i.e. for interval graphs, and unbounded for box intersection graphs in $\mathbb{R}^3$. We also study a parameter known as symmetric difference, which is intermediate between twin-width and functionality, and show that this parameter is unbounded both for interval graphs and for unit box intersection graphs in $\mathbb{R}^2$.

For any hereditary graph class $F$, we construct optimal adjacency labeling schemes for the classes of subgraphs and induced subgraphs of Cartesian products of graphs in $F$. As a consequence, we show that, if $F$ admits efficient adjacency labels (or, equivalently, small induced-universal graphs) meeting the information-theoretic minimum, then the classes of subgraphs and induced subgraphs of Cartesian products of graphs in $F$ do too. Our proof uses ideas from randomized communication complexity, hashing, and additive combinatorics, and improves upon recent results of Chepoi, Labourel, and Ratel [Journal of Graph Theory, 2020].

A temporal graph is a graph whose edges appear only at certain points in time. Recently, the second and the last three authors proposed a natural temporal analog of the Erdős-Rényi random graph model. The proposed model is obtained by randomly permuting the edges of an Erdős-Rényi random graph and interpreting this permutation as an ordering of presence times. It was shown that the connectivity threshold in the Erdős-Rényi model fans out into multiple phase transitions for several distinct notions of reachability in the temporal setting. In the present paper, we identify a sharp threshold for the emergence of a giant temporally connected component. We show that at $p = \log n/n$ the size of the largest temporally connected component increases from $o(n)$ to~$n-o(n)$. This threshold holds for both open and closed connected components, i.e. components that allow, respectively forbid, their connecting paths to use external nodes.

Given two $n$-vertex graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ of bounded treewidth, is there an $n$-vertex graph $G$ of bounded treewidth having subgraphs isomorphic to $G_1$ and $G_2$? Our main result is a negative answer to this question, in a strong sense: we show that the answer is no even if $G_1$ is a binary tree and $G_2$ is a ternary tree. We also provide an extensive study of cases where such `gluing' is possible. In particular, we prove that if $G_1$ has treewidth $k$ and $G_2$ has pathwidth $\ell$, then there is an $n$-vertex graph of treewidth at most $k + 3 \ell + 1$ containing both $G_1$ and $G_2$ as subgraphs.

We uncover a connection between two seemingly unrelated notions: lettericity, from structural graph theory, and geometric griddability, from the world of permutation patterns. Both of these notions capture important structural properties of their respective classes of objects. We prove that these notions are equivalent in the sense that a permutation class is geometrically griddable if and only if the corresponding class of inversion graphs has bounded lettericity.