arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider random simple temporal graphs in which every edge of the complete graph $K_n$ appears once within the time interval [0,1] independently and uniformly at random. Our main result is a sharp threshold on the size of any maximum $δ$-clique (namely a clique with edges appearing at most $δ$ apart within [0,1]) in random instances of this model, for any constant~$δ$. In particular, using the probabilistic method, we prove that the size of a maximum $δ$-clique is approximately $\frac{2\log{n}}{\log{\frac{1}δ}}$ with high probability (whp). What seems surprising is that, even though the random simple temporal graph contains $Θ(n^2)$ overlapping $δ$-windows, which (when viewed separately) correspond to different random instances of the Erdos-Renyi random graphs model, the size of the maximum $δ$-clique in the former model and the maximum clique size of the latter are approximately the same. Furthermore, we show that the minimum interval containing a $δ$-clique is $δ-o(δ)$ whp. We use this result to show that any polynomial time algorithm for $δ$-TEMPORAL CLIQUE is unlikely to have very large probability of success.

The domatic number of a graph is the maximum number of vertex disjoint dominating sets that partition the vertex set of the graph. In this paper we consider the fractional variant of this notion. Graphs with fractional domatic number 1 are exactly the graphs that contain an isolated vertex. Furthermore, it is known that all other graphs have fractional domatic number at least 2. In this note we characterize graphs with fractional domatic number 2. More specifically, we show that a graph without isolated vertices has fractional domatic number 2 if and only if it has a vertex of degree 1 or a connected component isomorphic to a 4-cycle. We conjecture that if the fractional domatic number is more than 2, then it is at least 7/3.

We investigate the computational complexity of finding temporally disjoint paths or walks in temporal graphs. There, the edge set changes over discrete time steps and a temporal path (resp. walk) uses edges that appear at monotonically increasing time steps. Two paths (or walks) are temporally disjoint if they never use the same vertex at the same time; otherwise, they interfere. This reflects applications in robotics, traffic routing, or finding safe pathways in dynamically changing networks. On the one extreme, we show that on general graphs the problem is computationally hard. The "walk version" is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the number of routes. However, it is polynomial-time solvable for any constant number of walks. The "path version" remains NP-hard even if we want to find only two temporally disjoint paths. On the other extreme, restricting the input temporal graph to have a path as underlying graph, quite counterintuitively, we find NP-hardness in general but also identify natural tractable cases.

In this paper we introduce a new operation for Linear Programming (LP), called LP complementation, which resembles many properties of LP duality. Given a maximisation (resp.~minimisation) LP $P$, we define its complement $Q$ as a specific minimisation (resp.~maximisation) LP with the same objective function as $P$. Our central result is the LP complementation theorem, that establishes the following relationship between the optimal value $\text{Opt}(P)$ of $P$ and the optimal value $\text{Opt}(Q)$ of its complement: $\frac{1}{\text{Opt}(P)}+\frac{1}{\text{Opt}(Q)}=1$. The LP complementation operation can be applied if and only if $\text{Opt}(P) > 1$. We then apply LP complementation to hypergraphs. For every hypergraph $H=(V,E)$, its dual is $H^*$ and we call $\overline{H}=(V,\{V\setminus e : e\in E\})$ the complement of $H$. For the covering LP $K(H)$ we obtain $\frac{1}{ \text{Opt}( K(H^*) ) }+\frac{1}{\text{Opt}( K(\overline{H}) ) } = 1$ (and similarly for packing, matching and transversal LPs). We then consider \emph{fractional graph theory}. We prove that the LP for the \Define{fractional in-dominating number} of a digraph $D$ is the complement of the LP for the \Define{fractional total out-dominating number} of the digraph complement of $D$. We also establish that the fractional matching number of a matroid coincides with its edge toughness. Finally, we introduce the problem \text{Vertex Cover with Budget (VCB)}: for a graph $G$ and a positive integer $b$, what is the maximum number $t_b$ of vertex covers $S_1, \dots, S_{t_b}$ of $G$, such that every vertex appears in at most $b$ vertex covers? We relate \text{VCB} with the LP $Q_G$ for the fractional chromatic number of $G$: as $b \to \infty$, $t_b \sim t_f \cdot b$, where $t_f$ is the optimal value of the complement LP of $Q_G$.

We consider the problems of finding optimal identifying codes, (open) locating-dominating sets and resolving sets of an interval or a permutation graph. In these problems, one asks to find a subset of vertices, normally called a \emph{solution} set, using which all vertices of the graph are distinguished. The identification can be done by considering the neighborhood within the solution set, or by employing the distances to the solution vertices. Normally the goal is to minimize the size of the solution set then. Here we study the case of interval graphs, unit interval graphs, (bipartite) permutation graphs and cographs. For these classes of graphs we give tight lower bounds for the size of such solution sets depending on the order of the input graph. While such lower bounds for the general class of graphs are in logarithmic order, the improved bounds in these special classes are of the order of either quadratic root or linear in terms of number of vertices. Moreover, the results for cographs lead to linear-time algorithms to solve the considered problems on inputs that are cographs.

Tolerance graphs model interval relations in such a way that intervals can tolerate a certain amount of overlap without being in conflict. In one of the most natural generalizations of tolerance graphs with direct applications in the comparison of DNA sequences from different organisms, namely multitolerance graphs, two tolerances are allowed for each interval - one from the left and one from the right side. Several efficient algorithms for optimization problems that are NP-hard in general graphs have been designed for tolerance and multitolerance graphs. In spite of this progress, the complexity status of some fundamental algorithmic problems on tolerance and multitolerance graphs, such as the dominating set problem, remained unresolved until now, three decades after the introduction of tolerance graphs. In this article we introduce two new geometric representations for tolerance and multitolerance graphs, given by points and line segments in the plane. Apart from being important on their own, these new representations prove to be a powerful tool for deriving both hardness results and polynomial time algorithms. Using them, we surprisingly prove that the dominating set problem can be solved in polynomial time on tolerance graphs and that it is APX-hard on multitolerance graphs, solving thus a longstanding open problem. This problem is the first one that has been discovered with a different complexity status in these two graph classes.

We consider the problems of finding optimal identifying codes, (open) locating-dominating sets and resolving sets (denoted IDENTIFYING CODE, (OPEN) LOCATING-DOMINATING SET and METRIC DIMENSION) of an interval or a permutation graph. In these problems, one asks to distinguish all vertices of a graph by a subset of the vertices, using either the neighbourhood within the solution set or the distances to the solution vertices. Using a general reduction for this class of problems, we prove that the decision problems associated to these four notions are NP-complete, even for interval graphs of diameter $2$ and permutation graphs of diameter $2$. While IDENTIFYING CODE and (OPEN) LOCATING-DOMINATING SET are trivially fixed-parameter-tractable when parameterized by solution size, it is known that in the same setting METRIC DIMENSION is $W[2]$-hard. We show that for interval graphs, this parameterization of METRIC DIMENSION is fixed-parameter-tractable.

An L-shape is the union of a horizontal and a vertical segment with a common endpoint. These come in four rotations: L, Γ, LE{} and \eeG. A $k$-bend path is a simple path in the plane, whose direction changes $k$ times from horizontal to vertical. If a graph admits an intersection representation in which every vertex is represented by an L, an L{} or Γ, a $k$-bend path, or a segment, then this graph is called an $\{L\}$-graph, $\{L,Γ\}$-graph, $B_k$-VPG-graph or SEG-graph, respectively. Motivated by a theorem of Middendorf and Pfeiffer [Discrete Mathematics, 108(1):365--372, 1992], stating that every $\{L,Γ\}$-graph is a SEG-graph, we investigate several known subclasses of SEG-graphs and show that they are $\{L\}$-graphs, or $B_k$-VPG-graphs for some small constant $k$. We show that all planar $3$-trees, all line graphs of planar graphs, and all full subdivisions of planar graphs are $\{L\}$-graphs. Furthermore we show that all complements of planar graphs are $B_{17}$-VPG-graphs and all complements of full subdivisions are $B_2$-VPG-graphs. Here a full subdivision is a graph in which each edge is subdivided at least once.

In this paper we prove that the \textsc{Min-Bisection} problem is NP-hard on \emph{unit disk graphs}, thus solving a longstanding open question.

Intersection graphs of geometric objects have been extensively studied, both due to their interesting structure and their numerous applications; prominent examples include interval graphs and permutation graphs. In this paper we study a natural graph class that generalizes both interval and permutation graphs, namely \emph{simple-triangle} graphs. Simple-triangle graphs - also known as \emph{PI} graphs (for Point-Interval) - are the intersection graphs of triangles that are defined by a point on a line $L_{1}$ and an interval on a parallel line $L_{2}$. They lie naturally between permutation and trapezoid graphs, which are the intersection graphs of line segments between $L_{1}$ and $L_{2}$ and of trapezoids between $L_{1}$ and $L_{2}$, respectively. Although various efficient recognition algorithms for permutation and trapezoid graphs are well known to exist, the recognition of simple-triangle graphs has remained an open problem since their introduction by Corneil and Kamula three decades ago. In this paper we resolve this problem by proving that simple-triangle graphs can be recognized in polynomial time. As a consequence, our algorithm also solves a longstanding open problem in the area of partial orders, namely the recognition of \emph{linear-interval orders}, i.e. of partial orders $P=P_{1}\cap P_{2}$, where $P_{1}$ is a linear order and $P_{2}$ is an interval order. This is one of the first results on recognizing partial orders $P$ that are the intersection of orders from two different classes $\mathcal{P}_{1}$ and $\mathcal{P}_{2}$. In complete contrast to this, partial orders $P$ which are the intersection of orders from the same class $\mathcal{P}$ have been extensively investigated, and in most cases the complexity status of these recognition problems has been already established.

It has been conjectured by Golumbic and Monma in 1984 that the intersection of tolerance and cocomparability graphs coincides with bounded tolerance graphs. The conjecture has been proved under some - rather strong - \emph{structural} assumptions on the input graph; in particular, it has been proved for complements of trees, and later extended to complements of bipartite graphs, and these are the only known results so far. Our main result in this article is that the above conjecture is true for every graph $G$ that admits a tolerance representation with exactly one unbounded vertex; note here that this assumption concerns only the given tolerance \emph{representation} $R$ of $G$, rather than any structural property of $G$. Moreover, our results imply as a corollary that the conjecture of Golumbic, Monma, and Trotter is true for every graph $G=(V,E)$ that has no three independent vertices $a,b,c\in V$ such that $N(a) \subset N(b) \subset N(c)$; this is satisfied in particular when $G$ is the complement of a triangle-free graph (which also implies the above-mentioned correctness for complements of bipartite graphs). Our proofs are constructive, in the sense that, given a tolerance representation $R$ of a graph $G$, we transform $R$ into a bounded tolerance representation $R^{\ast}$ of $G$. Furthermore, we conjecture that any \emph{minimal} tolerance graph $G$ that is not a bounded tolerance graph, has a tolerance representation with exactly one unbounded vertex. Our results imply the non-trivial result that, in order to prove the conjecture of Golumbic, Monma, and Trotter, it suffices to prove our conjecture.

In spite of the extensive studies of the 3-coloring problem with respect to several basic parameters, the complexity status of the 3-coloring problem on graphs with small diameter, i.e. with diameter 2 or 3, has been a longstanding and challenging open question. For graphs with diameter 2 we provide the first subexponential algorithm with complexity $2^{O(\sqrt{n\log n})}$, which is asymptotically the same as the currently best known time complexity for the graph isomorphism (GI) problem. Moreover, we prove that the graph isomorphism problem on 3-colorable graphs with diameter 2 is GI-complete. Furthermore we present a subclass of graphs with diameter 2 that admits a polynomial algorithm for 3-coloring. For graphs with diameter 3 we establish the complexity of 3-coloring by proving that for every $\varepsilon \in [0,1)$, 3-coloring is NP-complete on triangle-free graphs of diameter 3 and radius 2 with $n$ vertices and minimum degree $δ=Θ(n^{\varepsilon})$. Moreover, assuming ETH, we provide three different amplifications of our hardness results to obtain for every $\varepsilon \in [0,1)$ subexponential lower bounds for the complexity of 3-coloring on triangle-free graphs with diameter 3 and minimum degree $δ=Θ(n^{\varepsilon})$. Finally, we provide a 3-coloring algorithm with running time $2^{O(\min\{δΔ,\frac{n}δ\logδ\})}$ for graphs with diameter 3, where $δ$ (resp. $Δ$) is the minimum (resp. maximum) degree of the input graph. To the best of our knowledge, this algorithm is the first subexponential algorithm for graphs with $δ=ω(1)$ and for graphs with $δ=O(1)$ and $Δ=o(n)$. Due to the above lower bounds of the complexity of 3-coloring, the running time of this algorithm is asymptotically almost tight when the minimum degree if the input graph is $δ=Θ(n^{\varepsilon})$, where $\varepsilon \in [1/2,1)$.