arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider random simple temporal graphs in which every edge of the complete graph $K_n$ appears once within the time interval [0,1] independently and uniformly at random. Our main result is a sharp threshold on the size of any maximum $δ$-clique (namely a clique with edges appearing at most $δ$ apart within [0,1]) in random instances of this model, for any constant~$δ$. In particular, using the probabilistic method, we prove that the size of a maximum $δ$-clique is approximately $\frac{2\log{n}}{\log{\frac{1}δ}}$ with high probability (whp). What seems surprising is that, even though the random simple temporal graph contains $Θ(n^2)$ overlapping $δ$-windows, which (when viewed separately) correspond to different random instances of the Erdos-Renyi random graphs model, the size of the maximum $δ$-clique in the former model and the maximum clique size of the latter are approximately the same. Furthermore, we show that the minimum interval containing a $δ$-clique is $δ-o(δ)$ whp. We use this result to show that any polynomial time algorithm for $δ$-TEMPORAL CLIQUE is unlikely to have very large probability of success.

In this paper, we study the graph induced by the $\textit{2-swap}$ permutation on words with a fixed Parikh vector. A $2$-swap is defined as a pair of positions $s = (i, j)$ where the word $w$ induced by the swap $s$ on $v$ is $v[1] v[2] \dots v[i - 1] v[j] v[i+1] \dots v[j - 1] v[i] v[j + 1] \dots v[n]$. With these permutations, we define the $\textit{Configuration Graph}$, $G(P)$ defined over a given Parikh vector. Each vertex in $G(P)$ corresponds to a unique word with the Parikh vector $P$, with an edge between any pair of words $v$ and $w$ if there exists a swap $s$ such that $v \circ s = w$. We provide several key combinatorial properties of this graph, including the exact diameter of this graph, the clique number of the graph, and the relationships between subgraphs within this graph. Additionally, we show that for every vertex in the graph, there exists a Hamiltonian path starting at this vertex. Finally, we provide an algorithm enumerating these paths from a given input word of length $n$ with a delay of at most $O(\log n)$ between outputting edges, requiring $O(n \log n)$ preprocessing.

In spite of the extensive studies of the 3-coloring problem with respect to several basic parameters, the complexity status of the 3-coloring problem on graphs with small diameter, i.e. with diameter 2 or 3, has been a longstanding and challenging open question. For graphs with diameter 2 we provide the first subexponential algorithm with complexity $2^{O(\sqrt{n\log n})}$, which is asymptotically the same as the currently best known time complexity for the graph isomorphism (GI) problem. Moreover, we prove that the graph isomorphism problem on 3-colorable graphs with diameter 2 is GI-complete. Furthermore we present a subclass of graphs with diameter 2 that admits a polynomial algorithm for 3-coloring. For graphs with diameter 3 we establish the complexity of 3-coloring by proving that for every $\varepsilon \in [0,1)$, 3-coloring is NP-complete on triangle-free graphs of diameter 3 and radius 2 with $n$ vertices and minimum degree $δ=Θ(n^{\varepsilon})$. Moreover, assuming ETH, we provide three different amplifications of our hardness results to obtain for every $\varepsilon \in [0,1)$ subexponential lower bounds for the complexity of 3-coloring on triangle-free graphs with diameter 3 and minimum degree $δ=Θ(n^{\varepsilon})$. Finally, we provide a 3-coloring algorithm with running time $2^{O(\min\{δΔ,\frac{n}δ\logδ\})}$ for graphs with diameter 3, where $δ$ (resp. $Δ$) is the minimum (resp. maximum) degree of the input graph. To the best of our knowledge, this algorithm is the first subexponential algorithm for graphs with $δ=ω(1)$ and for graphs with $δ=O(1)$ and $Δ=o(n)$. Due to the above lower bounds of the complexity of 3-coloring, the running time of this algorithm is asymptotically almost tight when the minimum degree if the input graph is $δ=Θ(n^{\varepsilon})$, where $\varepsilon \in [1/2,1)$.