arXiv++ Combinatorics

In the critical beta-splitting model of a random $n$-leaf rooted tree, clades are recursively split into sub-clades, and a clade of $m$ leaves is split into sub-clades containing $i$ and $m-i$ leaves with probabilities $\propto 1/(i(m-i))$. Study of structure theory and explicit quantitative aspects of the model is an active research topic. It turns out that many results have several different proofs, and detailed studies of analytic proofs are given elsdewhere (via analysis of recursions and via Mellin transforms). This article describes two core probabilistic methods for studying $n \to \infty$ asymptotics of the basic finite-$n$-leaf models. (i) There is a canonical embedding into a continuous-time model, that is a random tree CTCS(n) on $n$ leaves with real-valued edge lengths, and this model turns out to be more convenient to study. The family (CTCS(n), $n \ge 2)$ is consistent under a ``delete random leaf and prune" operation. That leads to an explicit inductive construction (the {\em growth algorithm}) of (CTCS(n), $n \ge 2)$ as $n$ increases, and then to a limit structure CTCS$(\infty)$ which can be formalized via exchangeable partitions, in some ways analogous to the Brownian continuum random tree. (ii) There is an explicit description of the limit fringe distribution relative to a random leaf, whose graphical representation is essentially the format of the cladogram representation of biological phylogenies.

In the critical beta-splitting model of a random $n$-leaf rooted tree, clades are recursively (from the root) split into sub-clades, and a clade of $m$ leaves is split into sub-clades containing $i$ and $m-i$ leaves with probabilities $\propto 1/(i(m-i))$. Study of structure theory and explicit quantitative aspects of this model (in discrete or continuous versions) is an active research topic. For many results there are different proofs, probabilistic or analytic, so the model provides a testbed for a ``compare and contrast" discussion of techniques. This article provides an overview of results proved in the sequence of similarly-titled articles I, III, IV and related articles. We mostly do not repeat proofs given elsewhere: instead we seek to paint a ``Big Picture" via graphics and heuristics, and emphasize open problems. Our discussion is centered around three categories of results. (i) There is a CLT for leaf heights, and the analytic proofs can be extended to provide surprisingly precise analysis of other height-related aspects. (ii) There is an explicit description of the limit {\em fringe distribution} relative to a random leaf, whose graphical representation is essentially the format of the cladogram representation of biological phylogenies. (iii) There is a canonical embedding of the discrete model into a continuous-time model, that is a random tree CTCS(n) on $n$ leaves with real-valued edge lengths, and this model turns out more convenient to study. The family (CTCS(n), n \ge 2) is consistent under a ``delete random leaf and prune" operation. That leads to an explicit inductive construction of (CTCS(n), n \ge 2) as $n$ increases, and then to a limit structure CTCS($\infty$) formalized via exchangeable partitions. Many open problems remain, in particular to elucidate a relation between CTCS($\infty$) and the $β(2,1)$ coalescent.

The size of the largest common subtree (maximum agreement subtree) of two independent uniform random binary trees on $n$ leaves is known to be between orders $n^{1/8}$ and $n^{1/2}$. By a construction based on recursive splitting and analyzable by standard "stochastic fragmentation" methods, we improve the lower bound to order $n^β$ for $β= \frac{\sqrt{3} - 1}{2} = 0.366$. Improving the upper bound remains a challenging problem.