arXiv++ Combinatorics

Evolutionary scenarios describing the evolution of a family of genes within a collection of species comprise the mapping of the vertices of a gene tree $T$ to vertices and edges of a species tree $S$. The relative timing of the last common ancestors of two extant genes (leaves of $T$) and the last common ancestors of the two species (leaves of $S$) in which they reside is indicative of horizontal gene transfers (HGT) and ancient duplications. Orthologous gene pairs, on the other hand, require that their last common ancestors coincides with a corresponding speciation event. The relative timing information of gene and species divergences is captured by three colored graphs that have the extant genes as vertices and the species in which the genes are found as vertex colors: the equal-divergence-time (EDT) graph, the later-divergence-time (LDT) graph and the prior-divergence-time (PDT) graph, which together form an edge partition of the complete graph. Here we give a complete characterization in terms of informative and forbidden triples that can be read off the three graphs and provide a polynomial time algorithm for constructing an evolutionary scenario that explains the graphs, provided such a scenario exists. We show that every EDT graph is perfect. While the information about LDT and PDT graphs is necessary to recognize EDT graphs in polynomial-time for general scenarios, this extra information can be dropped in the HGT-free case. However, recognition of EDT graphs without knowledge of putative LDT and PDT graphs is NP-complete for general scenarios. In contrast, PDT graphs can be recognized in polynomial-time. We finally connect the EDT graph to the alternative definitions of orthology that have been proposed for scenarios with horizontal gene transfer. With one exception, the corresponding graphs are shown to be colored cographs.

Rooted acyclic graphs appear naturally when the phylogenetic relationship of a set $X$ of taxa involves not only speciations but also recombination, horizontal transfer, or hybridization, that cannot be captured by trees. A variety of classes of such networks have been discussed in the literature, including phylogenetic, level-1, tree-child, tree-based, galled tree, regular, or normal networks as models of different types of evolutionary processes. Clusters arise in models of phylogeny as the sets $\mathtt{C}(v)$ of descendant taxa of a vertex $v$. The clustering system $\mathscr{C}_N$ comprising the clusters of a network $N$ conveys key information on $N$ itself. In the special case of rooted phylogenetic trees, $T$ is uniquely determined by its clustering system $\mathscr{C}_T$. Although this is no longer true for networks in general, it is of interest to relate properties of $N$ and $\mathscr{C}_N$. Here, we systematically investigate the relationships of several well-studied classes of networks and their clustering systems. The main results are correspondences of classes of networks and clustering system of the following form: If $N$ is a network of type $\mathbb{X}$, then $\mathcal{C}_N$ satisfies $\mathbb{Y}$, and conversely if $\mathscr{C}$ is a clustering system satisfying $\mathbb{Y}$ then there is network $N$ of type $\mathbb{X}$ such that $\mathscr{C}\subseteq\mathscr{C}_N$.This, in turn, allows us to investigate the mutual dependencies between the distinct types of networks in much detail.

Horizontal gene transfer events partition a gene tree $T$ and thus, its leaf set into subsets of genes whose evolutionary history is described by speciation and duplication events alone. Indirect phylogenetic methods can be used to infer such partitions $\mathcal{P}$ from sequence similarity or evolutionary distances without any a priory knowledge about the underlying tree $T$. In this contribution, we assume that such a partition $\mathcal{P}$ of a set of genes $X$ is given and that, independently, an estimate $T$ of the original gene tree on $X$ has been derived. We then ask to what extent $T$ and the xenology information, i.e., $\mathcal{P}$ can be combined to determine the horizontal transfer edges in $T$. We show that for each pair of genes $x$ and $y$ with $x,y$ being in different parts of $\mathcal{P}$, it can be decided whether there always exists or never exists a horizontal gene transfer in $T$ along the path connecting $y$ and the most recent common ancestor of $x$ and $y$. This problem is equivalent to determining the presence or absence of the directed edge $(x,y)$ in so-called Fitch graphs; a more fine-grained version of graphs that represent the dependencies between the sets in $\mathcal{P}$. We then consider the generalization to insufficiently resolved gene trees and show that analogous results can be obtained. We show that the classification of $(x,y)$ can be computed in constant time after linear-time preprocessing. Using simulated gene family histories, we observe empirically that the vast majority of horizontal transfer edges in the gene tree $T$ can be recovered unambiguously.

Quasi-best match graphs (qBMGs) are a hereditary class of directed, properly vertex-colored graphs. They arise naturally in mathematical phylogenetics as a generalization of best match graphs, which formalize the notion of evolutionary closest relatedness of genes (vertices) in multiple species (vertex colors). They are explained by rooted trees whose leaves correspond to vertices. In contrast to BMGs, qBMGs represent only best matches at a restricted phylogenetic distance. We provide characterizations of qBMGs that give rise to polynomial-time recognition algorithms and identify the BMGs as the qBMGs that are color-sink-free. Furthermore, two-colored qBMGs are characterized as directed graphs satisfying three simple local conditions, two of which have appeared previously, namely bi-transitivity in the sense of Das et al. (2021) and a hierarchy-like structure of out-neighborhoods, i.e., $N(x)\cap N(y)\in\{N(x),N(y),\emptyset\}$ for any two vertices $x$ and $y$. Further results characterize qBMGs that can be explained by binary phylogenetic trees.

A rooted tree $T$ with vertex labels $t(v)$ and set-valued edge labels $λ(e)$ defines maps $δ$ and $\varepsilon$ on the pairs of leaves of $T$ by setting $δ(x,y)=q$ if the last common ancestor $\text{lca}(x,y)$ of $x$ and $y$ is labeled $q$, and $m\in \varepsilon(x,y)$ if $m\inλ(e)$ for at least one edge $e$ along the path from $\text{lca}(x,y)$ to $y$. We show that a pair of maps $(δ,\varepsilon)$ derives from a tree $(T,t,λ)$ if and only if there exists a common refinement of the (unique) least-resolved vertex labeled tree $(T_δ,t_δ)$ that explains $δ$ and the (unique) least resolved edge labeled tree $(T_{\varepsilon},λ_{\varepsilon})$ that explains $\varepsilon$ (provided both trees exist). This result remains true if certain combinations of labels at incident vertices and edges are forbidden.

Background. The supertree problem, i.e., the task of finding a common refinement of a set of rooted trees is an important topic in mathematical phylogenetics. The special case of a common leaf set $L$ is known to be solvable in linear time. Existing approaches refine one input tree using information of the others and then test whether the results are isomorphic. Results. A linear-time algorithm, LinCR, for constructing the common refinement $T$ of $k$ input trees with a common leaf set is proposed that explicitly computes the parent function of $T$ in a bottom-up approach. Conclusion. LinCR is simpler to implement than other asymptotically optimal algorithms for the problem and outperforms the alternatives in empirical comparisons. Availability. An implementation of LinCR in Python is freely available at https://github.com/david-schaller/tralda.

The question whether a partition $\mathcal{P}$ and a hierarchy $\mathcal{H}$ or a tree-like split system $\mathfrak{S}$ are compatible naturally arises in a wide range of classification problems. In the setting of phylogenetic trees, one asks whether the sets of $\mathcal{P}$coincide with leaf sets of connected components obtained by deleting some edges from the tree $T$ that represents $\mathcal{H}$ or $\mathfrak{S}$, respectively. More generally, we ask whether a refinement $T^*$ of $T$ exists such that $T^*$ and $\mathcal{P}$ are compatible in this sense. The latter is closely related to the question as to whether there exists a tree at all that is compatible with $\mathcal{P}$. We report several characterizations for (refinements of) hierarchies and split systems that are compatible with (systems of) partitions. In addition, we provide a linear-time algorithm to check whether refinements of trees and a given partition are compatible. The latter problem becomes NP-complete but fixed-parameter tractable if a system of partitions is considered instead of a single partition. In this context, we also explore the close relationship of the concept of compatibility and so-called Fitch maps.

Best match graphs (BMGs) are vertex-colored digraphs that naturally arise in mathematical phylogenetics to formalize the notion of evolutionary closest genes w.r.t. an a priori unknown phylogenetic tree. BMGs are explained by unique least resolved trees. We prove that the property of a rooted, leaf-colored tree to be least resolved for some BMG is preserved by the contraction of inner edges. For the special case of two-colored BMGs, this leads to a characterization of the least resolved trees (LRTs) of binary-explainable trees and a simple, polynomial-time algorithm for the minimum cardinality completion of the arc set of a BMG to reach a BMG that can be explained by a binary tree.

Best match graphs (BMGs) are a class of colored digraphs that naturally appear in mathematical phylogenetics and can be approximated with the help of similarity measures between gene sequences, albeit not without errors. The corresponding graph editing problem can be used as a means of error correction. Since the arc set modification problems for BMGs are NP-complete, efficient heuristics are needed if BMGs are to be used for the practical analysis of biological sequence data. Since BMGs have a characterization in terms of consistency of a certain set of rooted triples, we consider heuristics that operate on triple sets. As an alternative, we show that there is a close connection to a set partitioning problem that leads to a class of top-down recursive algorithms that are similar to Aho's supertree algorithm and give rise to BMG editing algorithms that are consistent in the sense that they leave BMGs invariant. Extensive benchmarking shows that community detection algorithms for the partitioning steps perform best for BMG editing.

2-colored best match graphs (2-BMGs) form a subclass of sink-free bi-transitive graphs that appears in phylogenetic combinatorics. There, 2-BMGs describe evolutionarily most closely related genes between a pair of species. They are explained by a unique least resolved tree (LRT). Introducing the concept of support vertices we derive an $O(|V|+|E|\log^2|V|)$-time algorithm to recognize 2-BMGs and to construct its LRT. The approach can be extended to also recognize binary-explainable 2-BMGs with the same complexity. An empirical comparison emphasizes the efficiency of the new algorithm.

Best match graphs (BMG) are a key intermediate in graph-based orthology detection and contain a large amount of information on the gene tree. We provide a near-cubic algorithm to determine whether a BMG is binary-explainable, i.e., whether it can be explained by a fully resolved gene tree and, if so, to construct such a tree. Moreover, we show that all such binary trees are refinements of the unique binary-resolvable tree (BRT), which in general is a substantial refinement of the also unique least resolved tree of a BMG. Finally, we show that the problem of editing an arbitrary vertex-colored graph to a binary-explainable BMG is NP-complete and provide an integer linear program formulation for this task.

Genome-scale orthology assignments are usually based on reciprocal best matches. In the absence of horizontal gene transfer (HGT), every pair of orthologs forms a reciprocal best match. Incorrect orthology assignments therefore are always false positives in the reciprocal best match graph. We consider duplication/loss scenarios and characterize unambiguous false-positive (u-fp) orthology assignments, that is, edges in the best match graphs (BMGs) that cannot correspond to orthologs for any gene tree that explains the BMG. Moreover, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm to identify all u-fp orthology assignments in a BMG. Simulations show that at least $75\%$ of all incorrect orthology assignments can be detected in this manner. All results rely only on the structure of the BMGs and not on any a priori knowledge about underlying gene or species trees.