arXiv++ Combinatorics

Every binary De~Bruijn sequence of order n satisfies a recursion 0=x_n+x_0+g(x_{n-1}, ..., x_1). Given a function f on (n-1) bits, let N(f; r) be the number of functions generating a De Bruijn sequence of order n which are obtained by changing r locations in the truth table of f. We prove a formula for the generating function \sum_r N(\ell; r) y^r when \ell is a linear function. The proof uses a weighted Matrix Tree Theorem and a description of the in-trees (or rooted trees) in the n-bit De Bruijn graph as perturbations of the Hamiltonian paths in the same graph.

A subset V of GF(2)^n is a tile if GF(2)^n can be covered by disjoint translates of V. In other words, V is a tile if and only if there is a subset A of GF(2)^n such that V+A = GF(2)^n uniquely (i.e., v + a = v' + a' implies that v=v' and a=a' where v,v' in V and a,a' in A). In some problems in coding theory and hashing we are given a putative tile V, and wish to know whether or not it is a tile. In this paper we give two computational criteria for certifying that V is not a tile. The first involves impossibility of a bin-packing problem, and the second involves infeasibility of a linear program. We apply both criteria to a list of putative tiles given by Gordon, Miller, and Ostapenko in that none of them are, in fact, tiles.

Given a 2-SAT formula $F$ consisting of $n$ variables and $\cn$ random clauses, what is the largest number of clauses $\max F$ satisfiable by a single assignment of the variables? We bound the answer away from the trivial bounds of $(3/4)cn$ and $cn$. We prove that for $c<1$, the expected number of clauses satisfiable is $\cn-Θ(1/n)$; for large $c$, it is $((3/4)c + Θ(\sqrt{c}))n$; for $c = 1+\eps$, it is at least $(1+\eps-O(\eps^3))n$ and at most $(1+\eps-Ω(\eps^3/\ln \eps))n$; and in the ``scaling window'' $c= 1+Θ(n^{-1/3})$, it is $cn-Θ(1)$. In particular, just as the decision problem undergoes a phase transition, our optimization problem also undergoes a phase transition at the same critical value $c=1$. Nearly all of our results are established without reference to the analogous propositions for decision 2-SAT, and as a byproduct we reproduce many of those results, including much of what is known about the 2-SAT scaling window. We consider ``online'' versions of MAX-2-SAT, and show that for one version, the obvious greedy algorithm is optimal. We can extend only our simplest MAX-2-SAT results to MAX-k-SAT, but we conjecture a ``MAX-k-SAT limiting function conjecture'' analogous to the folklore satisfiability threshold conjecture, but open even for $k=2$. Neither conjecture immediately implies the other, but it is natural to further conjecture a connection between them. Finally, for random MAXCUT (the size of a maximum cut in a sparse random graph) we prove analogous results.

We consider the following long range percolation model: an undirected graph with the node set $\{0,1,...,N\}^d$, has edges $(\x,\y)$ selected with probability $\approx β/||\x-\y||^s$ if $||\x-\y||>1$, and with probability 1 if $||\x-\y||=1$, for some parameters $β,s>0$. This model was introduced by Benjamini and Berger, who obtained bounds on the diameter of this graph for the one-dimensional case $d=1$ and for various values of $s$, but left cases $s=1,2$ open. We show that, with high probability, the diameter of this graph is $Θ(\log N/\log\log N)$ when $s=d$, and, for some constants $0<η_1<η_2<1$, it is at most $N^{η_2}$, when $s=2d$ and is at least $N^{η_1}$ when $d=1,s=2,β<1$ or $s>2d$. We also provide a simple proof that the diameter is at most $\log^{O(1)}N$ with high probability, when $d<s<2d$, established previously by Berger and Benjamini.