arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a field $\mathbb{F}$ and integers $d$ and $k$, a set of vectors of $\mathbb{F}^d$ is called $k$-nearly orthogonal if its members are non-self-orthogonal and every $k+1$ of them include an orthogonal pair. We prove that for every prime $p$ there exists a positive constant $δ= δ(p)$, such that for every field $\mathbb{F}$ of characteristic $p$ and for all integers $k \geq 2$ and $d \geq k^{1/(p-1)}$, there exists a $k$-nearly orthogonal set of at least $d^{δ\cdot k^{1/(p-1)}/ \log k}$ vectors of $\mathbb{F}^d$. In particular, for the binary field we obtain a set of $d^{Ω( k /\log k)}$ vectors, and this is tight up to the $\log k$ term in the exponent. For comparison, the best known lower bound over the reals is $d^{Ω( \log k / \log \log k)}$ (Alon and Szegedy, Graphs and Combin., 1999). The proof combines probabilistic and spectral arguments.

The orthogonality dimension of a graph $G$ over $\mathbb{R}$ is the smallest integer $k$ for which one can assign a nonzero $k$-dimensional real vector to each vertex of $G$, such that every two adjacent vertices receive orthogonal vectors. We prove that for every sufficiently large integer $k$, it is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard to decide whether the orthogonality dimension of a given graph over $\mathbb{R}$ is at most $k$ or at least $2^{(1-o(1)) \cdot k/2}$. We further prove such hardness results for the orthogonality dimension over finite fields as well as for the closely related minrank parameter, which is motivated by the index coding problem in information theory. This in particular implies that it is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard to approximate these graph quantities to within any constant factor. Previously, the hardness of approximation was known to hold either assuming certain variants of the Unique Games Conjecture or for approximation factors smaller than $3/2$. The proofs involve the concept of line digraphs and bounds on their orthogonality dimension and on the minrank of their complement.

A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-subspace choosable over a field $\mathbb{F}$ if for every assignment of $k$-dimensional subspaces of some finite-dimensional vector space over $\mathbb{F}$ to the vertices of $G$, it is possible to choose for each vertex a nonzero vector from its subspace so that adjacent vertices receive orthogonal vectors over $\mathbb{F} $. The subspace choice number of $G$ over $\mathbb{F}$ is the smallest integer $k$ for which $G$ is $k$-subspace choosable over $\mathbb{F}$. This graph parameter, introduced by Haynes, Park, Schaeffer, Webster, and Mitchell (Electron. J. Comb., 2010), is inspired by well-studied variants of the chromatic number of graphs, such as the (color) choice number and the orthogonality dimension. We study the subspace choice number of graphs over various fields. We first prove that the subspace choice number of every graph with average degree $d$ is at least $Ω(\sqrt{d/\ln d})$ over any field. We then focus on bipartite graphs and consider the problem of estimating, for a given integer $k$, the smallest integer $m$ for which the subspace choice number of the complete bipartite graph $K_{k,m}$ over a field $\mathbb{F}$ exceeds $k$. We prove upper and lower bounds on this quantity as well as for several extensions of this problem. Our results imply a substantial difference between the behavior of the choice number and that of the subspace choice number. We also consider the computational aspect of the subspace choice number, and show that for every $k \geq 3$ it is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard to decide whether the subspace choice number of a given bipartite graph over $\mathbb{F}$ is at most $k$, provided that $\mathbb{F}$ is either the real field or any finite field.