arXiv++ Combinatorics

Erdős Problem 725 asks for an asymptotic formula for the number $L_{k,n}$ of ordered, labelled $k\times n$ Latin rectangles. Godsil and McKay proved that $L_{k,n}\sim (n!)^k((n)_k/n^k)^n(1-k/n)^{-n/2}e^{-k/2}$ for $k=o(n^{6/7})$. We provide a partial solution to Erdős Problem 725 by proving this asymptotic for every $k=o(n)$. More precisely, set $\widetilde A_{k,n}=(n!)^k((n)_k/n^k)^n\exp\{[n(H_n-H_{n-k})-k]/2\}$. For every $K(n)=o(n)$, uniformly for $0\leq k\leq K(n)$, we prove $\log(L_{k,n}/\widetilde A_{k,n})=O(k^2/n^2)$, with an absolute implied constant. The results of this paper have been formally verified in Lean.

We resolve Erdős Problems #593 and #1177. Problem #593 asks which finite triple systems occur in every uncountably chromatic triple system; the answer is exactly the class generated from private-vertex expansions of finite bipartite graphs by finite disjoint unions and one-point amalgamations. Equivalently, after isolated vertices are removed, a finite triple system is obligatory precisely when it is linear, every hyperedge-node of its Levi graph has an incident bridge, and every Berge cycle is even. The proof uses an exact bridge-trace theorem for complete-rank one-apex sequence lifts. We also prove that, for every uncountable cardinal kappa, there is a linear triple system of chromatic number exactly kappa, with at most 2^{2^mu} vertices when kappa=mu^+. These two ingredients give a class-valued exact avoidance-spectrum dichotomy for every finite forbidden triple system. As a consequence, Erdős Problem #1177 has truth values yes, no, and yes.

We resolve Erdős Problem 550, originally asked as question (2) of Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau, and Schelp. Precisely, for fixed integers $k\geq 2$ and $1\leq m_1\leq \cdots \leq m_k$, we prove that, for every sufficiently large $n$ and every $n$-vertex tree $T$, $R(T,K_{m_1,\ldots,m_k}) \leq (k-1)(R(T,K_{m_1,m_2})-1)+m_1$. The proof combines a new off-Turán tree-embedding theorem with a compactness-and-rounding theorem for represented bounded-rank hypergraph obstructions. The embedding theorem follows from Szemerédi regularity and a local regular-matching embedding lemma of Hladký and Piguet. The compactness argument uses shadow hypergraphs to retain obstructions whose vertices escape along the limiting sequence.

For a graph $G$ put $h_r(G)=\max{χ(H):H\subseteq G,\operatorname{girth}(H)\ge r}.$ Erdős and Hajnal asked whether $h_r(G)\to\infty$ as $χ(G)\to\infty$, for every fixed $r\ge4$. We prove this in every fixed polynomial edge-density regime: for all $r\ge4$, $k\ge2$, $P,C>0$, there is $M=M_{r,k}(P,C)$ such that $χ(G)\ge M,\ e(G)\le Cχ(G)^P\Longrightarrow h_r(G)\ge k.$ Quantitatively, after replacing $P$ by $P\vee2$ and $C$ by $C\vee2$, $M_{r,k}(P,C)\le \exp!\left(O_{r,k}\bigl((P+2+\log(C\vee2))^2\bigr)\right),$ and consequently the same conclusion holds throughout the quasi-polynomial range $e(G)\le \exp\bigl(C_0(\logχ(G))^a\bigr),\ 1 < a < 3/2,$ for all sufficiently large $χ(G)$. In each fixed polynomial-density regime we also obtain $f_{P,C}(k,r)\le k^{O_{r,P,C}(1)}.$ The proof combines a chromatic-defect random extraction lemma, compact and near-quadratic sparse-core bases, and a peeling/thinning bootstrap increasing the admissible edge exponent by $1/(r-1)$. We also prove structural saturation results for possible counterexamples, including Moore-strength exact-cycle packings and quadratic saturation in projected colour-pair space. Finally, writing $h_r^{\mathrm f}(G)=\max{χ_{\mathrm f}(H):H\subseteq G,\operatorname{girth}(H)\ge r},$ we develop a fractional random-extraction framework based on Mohar-Wu preservation. We prove sufficient cheap-cycle-killing criteria and verify them for several structured families, including clique-organised families, line graphs of incidence graphs of equal-order generalized quadrangles and generalized hexagons, and the Bohman-Keevash tracking-time triangle-free-process graph. We also isolate a density-free obstruction that any proof using this fractional surgery route must overcome.

For $n\ge 2$, let $\mathcal{M}(n)$ be the supremum of $\sum_{a\in A}1/(n-a)$ over pairwise coprime sets $A\subset [1,n)$. Erdős asked whether $\mathcal{M}(n)\le \sum_{p<n}1/p+O(1)$ uniformly in $n$. We prove the quantitative average-order formula $$ \sum_{n\le N}\mathcal{M}(n) = e^{-γ}N\log\log N+O(N). $$ The lower bound comes from the self-rough construction $\{n-d:P^{-}(n-d)>d\}$, while the upper bound uses bounded-cost dual certificates and Buchstab--de Bruijn estimates for rough numbers. We also prove that $$ \mathcal{M}(n)=(e^{-γ}+o(1))\log\log n $$ for almost all $n$, with a quantitative exceptional-set bound, and hence Erdős's inequality holds for almost all $n$. The almost-all proof uses a long-interval two-dimensional beta-sieve estimate for two moving forbidden residue classes, together with an exact finite singular-series cancellation. Finally, we prove the pointwise bound $\mathcal{M}(n)\le (2+\varepsilon)\log\log n+O_{\varepsilon}(1)$, explain the linear-sieve barrier behind the constant $2$, and record structural certificates, conditional window-packing reductions, numerical examples, and CRT sharpness constructions.