arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the Ehrhart theory of half-open $d$-dimensional integer parallelepipeds $Π$. Although the lattice-point count $tΠ\cap \Z^d$ is known to be simply $\vol Πt^d$ for positive integer $t$, the corresponding counting function for arbitrary real dilations $t$ has subtle, nontrivial periodic structure. We give explicit formulas for this real Ehrhart quasi-polynomial, and more generally for all the discrete moments of the real dilates of $Π$: $\sum_{p\in tΠ\cap\mathbb Z^d}\langle p,z\rangle^m$. The formulas are expressed in terms of Barnes polynomials and polytope Dedekind sums, which encode the periodic lattice flow of translated integer lattices on the flat torus determined by $Π$. Our approach develops further the study of polytope Dedekind sums, introduced recently in \cite{Robins2026}. In particular, we obtain novel identities for polytope Dedekind sums by using iterated discrete derivatives. Moreover, we show that the Ehrhart quasi-coefficients of $L_Π(t)$ are precisely alternating sums of polytope Dedekind sums. Finally, we give an Ehrhart-type reciprocity law relating $L_Π(t)$ at negative arguments to the lattice-point count of the `opposite' half-open parallelepiped.

We initiate a systematic study of Inc-invariant chains of graphs, the combinatorial counterparts of Inc-invariant chains of edge ideals arising in the theory of equivariant Noetherianity. Such a chain consists of graphs on growing vertex sets whose edge sets are compatible with the action of the monoid of strictly increasing maps on the positive integers. We show that several associated combinatorial invariants exhibit rigid asymptotic behavior. The independence number eventually stabilizes, and every fixed entry of the $f$-vector and the $h$-vector of the independence complex is eventually linear. For clique complexes, every fixed entry of the $f$-vector is eventually polynomial, whereas the entries of the $h$-vector are eventually quasi-polynomial. Moreover, the clique and chromatic numbers are eventually quasi-linear, and their difference is eventually at most one. We also prove that the matching number eventually attains the maximal value $\lfloor n/2\rfloor$. Finally, admissible and minimal paths eventually have lengths at most $3$ and $5$, respectively, and their maximal lengths stabilize. These results reveal strong asymptotic regularity in graph families governed by increasing symmetry.

For a finite sequence of positive integers $\boldsymbol{a}=(a_1,\dots,a_n)$, the restricted partition function $q_{\boldsymbol{a}}(k)$ denote the number of nonnegative integer solutions to the equation $a_1x_1+a_2x_2+\cdots +a_nx_n=k$. It is proved to be a quasi-polynomial of degree $n-1$. Write $q_{\boldsymbol{a}}(k)=\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}c_j(k)k^j$ with periodic coefficient functions $c_j$, and set $b_m=\#\{i:m\mid a_i\}$. In 2008, Beck, Sam, and Woods conjectured that the minimum period of $c_j(k)$ is $\mathrm{lcm}\{m:b_m>j\}$. In this paper, we derive an exact root-of-unity formula for every coefficient function $c_j(k)$. The formula proves the conjectured divisibility upper bound, but it also reveals a lower bound for the period of $c_j(k)$. Both divisibility bounds are sharp. This leads us to construct a family of counterexamples to this conjecture.

Given a numerical semigroup $S$ and a positive integer $p$, the quotient $\frac{S}{p}=\{n\in \mathbb{N} \mid pn\in S\}$ also forms a numerical semigroup. When $S=\langle a,b\rangle$ with $\gcd(a,b)=1$, a well-known open problem is to find a closed-form formula for the Frobenius number $g\!\left(\frac{\langle a,b\rangle}{p}\right)$, which remains open even in the special case $b=a+1$. Inspired by Curtis's theorem on the non-existence of polynomial formulas for the Frobenius number $g(\langle s_1,s_2,s_3\rangle)$, we provide a negative answer to this open problem in a certain sense. Concretely, we obtain the following three main results. (i): The Frobenius number $g\!\left(\frac{\langle a,b\rangle}{p}\right)$ cannot be represented, uniformly in $a,b,p$, by any finite collection of polynomial (or rational) formulas. (ii): For each fixed $p$, the function $a\mapsto g\!\left(\frac{\langle a,a+1\rangle}{p}\right)$ is a quadratic quasi-polynomial with period dividing $p$. (iii): There is no nonzero polynomial $F\in \mathbb{C}[X_1,X_2,X_3]$ satisfying $F\left(a,p,g\!\left(\frac{\langle a,a+1\rangle}{p}\right)\right)=0$ for all primes $a,p$ with $2<p<a$; the same conclusion already holds if only $p$ is required to be prime and $a$ ranges over all integers greater than $p$. While (iii) is stronger than (i), the proofs of the two results reveal different insights. Dirichlet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions plays a crucial role in our arguments.

Quasi-polynomials are ubiquitous in combinatorics and algebra, as they arise in a variety of enumeration problems. Because quasi-polynomials consist of constituent polynomials, their behavior is more subtle than for a single polynomial. In particular, unlike for a polynomial, it is possible for a quasi-polynomial defined on the positive integers to have infinitely many points at which it is decreasing. In this work, we characterize quasi-polynomials of degree $d$ and period dividing $p$ that are eventually nondecreasing, i.e., that have only finitely many values at which they decrease. We then give a detailed analysis of the space of eventually nondecreasing quasi-polynomials with fixed degree $d$ and period dividing a fixed $p$ such that the $h$-vector of the quasi-polynomial is nonnegative. Using this analysis, we determine the rate of growth of the number of such quasi-polynomials as a function of the sum of the $h$-vector entries for the $0$-th constituent polynomial.

The Erdős--Pósa theorem asserts that every graph $G$ with no $k$ disjoint cycles contains a set $X$ of $f(k)$ vertices such that $G\setminus X$ has no cycle. Robertson and Seymour showed that this Erdős--Pósa property also holds for $H$-minor models of any planar graph $H$. Equivalently, if $G$ has no $k$ minor models of $H$ pairwise at distance at least 1 (i.e. disjoint), then one can remove $f(k,H)$ balls of radius 0 (i.e. vertices) to make the graph $H$-minor free. We show that this coarse graph theory point of view generalizes to distance at least 2 versus radius 1 balls, yielding the induced Erdős--Pósa property for planar minors. Namely, every graph $G$ which does not contain $k$ pairwise non-adjacent minor models of a planar graph $H$ (we say that $G$ is $kH$-free) can be made $H$-minor free by removing $f(k,H)$ neighborhoods. The proof relies on the fact that sparse $kH$-free graphs have linearly many independent large protrusions. The same method gives that sparse $kH$-free graphs can be made $H$-minor free by deleting $O(\log n)$ vertices (and thus have logarithmic tree-width). This gives a quasi-polynomial algorithm for the Maximum Independent Set problem for $kH$-free graphs.

For a general curve in positive characteristic, taking the Frobenius pullback induces a generically finite rational map V on the moduli space of rank 2 vector bundles with trivial determinant. Recently, Kondo--Wakabayashi show that the generic degree of V, considered as a function on the characteristic of the base field, is a quasi-polynomial. In this paper, we show that this quasi-polynomial is indeed a polynomial, and we write out this polynomial explicitly.

For a graph $G$ put $h_r(G)=\max{χ(H):H\subseteq G,\operatorname{girth}(H)\ge r}.$ Erdős and Hajnal asked whether $h_r(G)\to\infty$ as $χ(G)\to\infty$, for every fixed $r\ge4$. We prove this in every fixed polynomial edge-density regime: for all $r\ge4$, $k\ge2$, $P,C>0$, there is $M=M_{r,k}(P,C)$ such that $χ(G)\ge M,\ e(G)\le Cχ(G)^P\Longrightarrow h_r(G)\ge k.$ Quantitatively, after replacing $P$ by $P\vee2$ and $C$ by $C\vee2$, $M_{r,k}(P,C)\le \exp!\left(O_{r,k}\bigl((P+2+\log(C\vee2))^2\bigr)\right),$ and consequently the same conclusion holds throughout the quasi-polynomial range $e(G)\le \exp\bigl(C_0(\logχ(G))^a\bigr),\ 1 < a < 3/2,$ for all sufficiently large $χ(G)$. In each fixed polynomial-density regime we also obtain $f_{P,C}(k,r)\le k^{O_{r,P,C}(1)}.$ The proof combines a chromatic-defect random extraction lemma, compact and near-quadratic sparse-core bases, and a peeling/thinning bootstrap increasing the admissible edge exponent by $1/(r-1)$. We also prove structural saturation results for possible counterexamples, including Moore-strength exact-cycle packings and quadratic saturation in projected colour-pair space. Finally, writing $h_r^{\mathrm f}(G)=\max{χ_{\mathrm f}(H):H\subseteq G,\operatorname{girth}(H)\ge r},$ we develop a fractional random-extraction framework based on Mohar-Wu preservation. We prove sufficient cheap-cycle-killing criteria and verify them for several structured families, including clique-organised families, line graphs of incidence graphs of equal-order generalized quadrangles and generalized hexagons, and the Bohman-Keevash tracking-time triangle-free-process graph. We also isolate a density-free obstruction that any proof using this fractional surgery route must overcome.

The picture-hanging puzzle, popularized by Demaine et al. (2014), asks for a way to wrap a wire around $n$ nails such that the picture hangs as long as fewer than $k$ nails are removed, but falls as soon as any $k$ are removed. Solutions correspond to words in the free group $F_n$. We give explicit, deterministic, polynomial-length constructions for two regimes: $2$-out-of-$n$ with word length at most $\tfrac{8}{3}n^{\log_2 6} - 4n^2$, and $(n-2)$-out-of-$n$ with word length $6n\log_2(n/2)$, both for $n$ a power of two. These improve on Wästlund's quasi-polynomial deterministic construction in their respective regimes. We also report, via exhaustive computer search, the exact minimum length of $16$ for the $2$-out-of-$4$ puzzle, attained by two structurally distinct solutions. As an additional contribution, we observe that the natural workshop realization with carabiners on a flat board introduces an over/under ambiguity at every wire crossing; a wrong choice can produce a Whitehead link, which is topologically distinct from the intended commutator.

This paper is to study the Ehrhart function $L(P,t)$ of a rational $n$-polytope $P$, defined as the number of lattice points of dilated polytopes $tP$ with real numbers $t\geq 0$. It turns out that $L(P,t)$ is a quasi-polynomial of real variable $t$ in the sense that \[ L(P,t)=\sum_{k=0}^{n} c_k(P,t)t^k, \quad t\geq 0, \] where $c_k(P,t)$ are periodic piecewise polynomials of degree $n-k$ if ${\rm aff}\,P$ contains the origin, and are periodic functions vanishing almost everywhere otherwise. When $P$ is a rational simplex $σ$, the coefficient functions $c_k(σ,t)$ are given explicitly in terms of vertex information of the simplex $σ$. Moreover, the reciprocity law still holds.

An equivariant characteristic quasi-polynomial is a quasi-polynomial in $q$ consisting of the permutation character on the mod $q$ complement of the corresponding Coxeter arrangement. This concept is a refinement of the conventional characteristic quasi-polynomials of root systems. In this paper, we will show equivariant-theoretic refinements of the some properties of characteristic quasi-polynomials of root systems. Furthermore, we will explicitly compute equivariant characteristic quasi-polynomials of all irreducible reduced root systems and discuss the relationship with root systems constructed by the folding of the extended Dynkin diagrams.

For a permutation $u\in S_n$, let $N\ast u\in S_{Nn}$ be the permutation with scaled Lehmer code. For given $u,v,w\in S_n$ and integer $N$, the stretched Schubert coefficients are defined as $f_{u,v,w}(N):=c_{N*u,N*v}^{N*w}$. Our main result is that the function $f_{u,v,w}(N)$ is eventually quasi-polynomial. This proves Kirillov's conjecture (2004), that the generating function for the sequence $\{f_{u,v,w}(N)\}$ is rational. For the proof, we use combinatorics of pipe dreams to show that Schubert coefficients are given as an alternating sum of the numbers of integer points in certain polytopes. These polytopes behave nicely under stretching, and we use Ehrhart theory to obtain the result. As a consequence of the proof, we also present new counterexamples to the saturation conjecture for Schubert coefficients, and give computational applications.

As part of the graph minor project, Robertson and Seymour showed in 1990 that the class of graphs that can be embedded in a given surface can be characterized by a finite set of minimal excluded minors. However, their proof, because existential, provides no explicit information about these excluded minors. In 1993, Seymour established the first upper bound on the order of such minimal excluded minors. Very recently, Houdaigoui and Kawarabayashi improved this result by deriving a quasi-polynomial upper bound. Despite this progress, the gap between this bound and the known linear lower bound $Ω(g)$ (where $g$ denotes the genus) remains substantial. In particular, they conjectured that a polynomial upper bound should hold. In this paper, we confirm this conjecture by showing that the order of the minimal excluded minors for a surface of genus $g$ is $O(g^{8+\varepsilon})$ for every $\varepsilon >0$. This result significantly narrows the gap between the known lower and upper bounds, bringing the asymptotic behavior much closer to the conjectured optimum. Our approach introduces a new forbidden structure of minimal excluded minors. Let $G$ be a minimal excluded minor for a surface of Euler genus $g$. Houdaigoui and Kawarabayashi showed that $G$ contains $O(\log g)$ pairwise disjoint cycles that are contractible and nested in some embedding of $G$. We strengthen this result by proving a separator-based variant: for any contractible subgraph $H \subseteq G$ with a separator of size $s$ (with $H$ completely contained in one side), the subgraph $H$ contains $O(\log s)$ disjoint cycles that are contractible and nested in some embedding of $G$. This allows us to replace a genus-dependent bound with a separator-dependent one, which is the main new ingredient in deriving our polynomial bound.

Let $G$ be a strongly regular graph of prime order $p$ with connection degree $k \geq 6$. We prove that the \emph{quantum walk characteristic polynomial} $χ_q(G,λ) \coloneqq \det(λI - U_G)$, where $U_G$ is the coined quantum walk operator on $G$, completely determines $G$ up to isomorphism within the class of strongly regular graphs of the same order. The proof proceeds in three steps. First, we show that $U_G$ block-diagonalizes under the discrete Fourier transform over $\Z_p$, yielding $p$ blocks $U_G^{(j)}$ of size $k \times k$. Second, we prove an explicit formula \[ χ_q\!\bigl(U_G^{(j)}, λ\bigr) = (λ-1)^{(k-2)/2}(λ+1)^{(k-2)/2} \!\left(λ^2 - \tfrac{2\widehat{A}_G(j)}{k}\,λ+ 1\right), \] from which the Fourier coefficient $\widehat{A}_G(j)$ is recovered as the unique real part of an eigenvalue of $U_G^{(j)}$ distinct from $\pm 1$. Third, the inverse discrete Fourier transform recovers the connection set $S$ of $G$, and Turner's theorem (1967) identifies $G$ up to isomorphism. As a consequence, graph isomorphism is decidable in polynomial time within this class using the quantum walk spectrum, without resorting to the general quasi-polynomial algorithm of Babai (2016).

Let $\mathcal{P} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n}$ be a polytope whose vertices have rational coordinates. By a seminal result of E. Ehrhart, the number of integer lattice points in the $k$th dilate of $\mathcal{P}$ ($k$ a positive integer) is a quasi-polynomial function of $k$ -- that is, a "polynomial" in which the coefficients are themselves periodic functions of $k$. It is an open problem to determine which quasi-polynomials are the Ehrhart quasi-polynomials of rational polytopes. As partial progress on this problem, we construct families of polytopes in which the periods of the coefficient functions take on various prescribed values.

In the theory of error-correcting codes, the minimum weight and the weight enumerator play a crucial role in evaluating the error-correcting capacity. In this paper, by viewing the weight enumerator as a quasi-polynomial, we reduce the calculation of the minimum weight to that of a code over a smaller integer residue ring. We also give a transformation formula between the Tutte quasi-polynomial and the weight enumerator. Furthermore, we compute the number of maximum weight codewords for the codes related to the matroids $N_k$ and $Z_k$. This is equivalent to computing the characteristic quasi-polynomial of the hyperplane arrangements related to $N_k$ and $Z_k$.

We give novel and explicit formulas for the Ehrhart quasi-polynomials of rational simple polytopes, in terms of Barnes polynomials and discrete moments of half-open parallelepipeds. These formulas also hold for all positive dilations of a rational polytope. There is an interesting appearance of an extra complex z-parameter, which seems to allow for more compact formulations. We also give similar formulas for discrete moments of rational polytopes, and their positive dilates, objects known in the literature as sums of polynomials over a polytope. The appearance of the Barnes polynomials and the Barnes numbers allow for explicit computations. From this work, it is clear that the complexity of computing Ehrhart quasi-polynomials lies mainly in the computation of various discrete moments of parallelepipeds. These discrete moments are in general summed over a particular lattice flow on a compact torus, defined in this paper. Some of the consequences involve novel vanishing identities for rational polytopes. As another consequence, we obtain a differential equation for discrete moments of rational polytopes, which extends the work of Eva Linke. For smooth polytopes, we obtain novel and much simpler formulations of Ehrhart polynomials, discrete moments, and vanishing identities that may be of independent interest from the perspective of Barnes polynomials and Barnes numbers. These formulations show the utility of Barnes polynomials in geometric combinatorics, due to their very rich structure that extends the 1-dimensional Bernoulli polynomials.

Testing the unimodular equivalence of two full-dimensional integral simplices can be reduced to testing unimodular permutation (UP) equivalence of two nonsingular matrices. We conduct a systematic study of UP-equivalence, which leads to the first average-case quasi-polynomial time algorithm, called \texttt{HEM}, for deciding the unimodular equivalence of $d$-dimensional integral simplices, as well as achieving a polynomial-time complexity with a failure probability less than $2.5 \times 10^{-7}$. A key ingredient is the introduction of the \emph{permuted Hermite normal form} and its associated \emph{pattern group}, which streamlines the UP-equivalence test by comparing canonical forms derived from induced coset representatives. We also present an acceleration strategy based on Smith normal forms. As a theoretical by-product, we prove that two full-dimensional integral simplices are unimodularly equivalent if and only if their $n$-dimensional pyramids are unimodularly equivalent. This resolves an open question posed by Abney-McPeek et al.

Given an (affine) integral arrangement $\mathcal{A}$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, the reduction of $\mathcal{A}$ modulo an arbitrary positive integer $q$ naturally yields an arrangement $\mathcal{A}_q$ in $\mathbb{Z}_q^n$. Our primary objective is to study the combinatorial aspects of the restriction $\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)}$ to the solution space of $B\bm x=\bm b$, and its reduction $\mathcal{A}_q^{(B,\bm b)}$ modulo $q$. This work generalizes the earlier results of Kamiya, Takemura and Terao, as well as Chen and Wang. The purpose of this paper is threefold as follows. Firstly, we derive an explicit counting formula for the cardinality of the complement $M\big(\mathcal{A}_q^{(B,\bm b)}\big)$ of $\mathcal{A}_q^{(B,\bm b)}$; and prove that for all positive integers $q>q_0$, this cardinality coincides with a quasi-polynomial $χ^{\text{quasi}}\big(\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)},q\big)$ in $q$ with a period $ρ_C$. Secondly, we weaken Chen and Wang's original hypothesis $a \mid b$ to a strictly more general condition $\gcd(a,ρ_C)\mid \gcd(b,ρ_C)$, and introduce the concept of combinatorial equivalence for positive integers. Within this framework, we establish three unified comparison relations: between the unsigned coefficients of $χ^{\text{quasi}}\big(\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)},a\big)$ and $χ^{\text{quasi}}\big(\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)},b\big)$; between the unsigned coefficients of distinct constituents of $χ^{\text{quasi}}\big(\mathcal{A}^{(B,\bm b)},q\big)$; and between the cardinalities of $M\big(\mathcal{A}_q^{(B,\bm b)}\big)$ and $M\big(\mathcal{A}_{pq}^{(B,\bm b)}\big)$. Thirdly, using our method, we revisit the enumerative aspects of group colorings and nowhere-zero nonhomogeneous form flows from the early work of Forge, Zaslavsky and Kochol.

A result of Pyber states that every finite group $G$ contains an abelian subgroup whose order is quasi-polynomially large in $\lvert G\rvert$. We prove a similar result for $K$-approximate subgroups of solvable groups under only modest restrictions on $K$. We show that, if $A$ is a finite $K$-approximate group contained in some solvable group, then some abelian group intersects $A^4$ in at least $\exp(Ω(\log^{1/6}\lvert A\rvert/\log 2K))$ elements. We also prove a similar result for approximate subgroups of finite groups with no large alternating subquotients. Along the way, we obtain polynomial (instead of quasi-polynomial) bounds for the same statement of approximate subgroups of linear groups. We give two applications. Firstly, we consider the conjecture of Alon that every finite group $G$ admits a Cayley graph with clique number and independence number $O(\log\lvert G\rvert)$. Conlon, Fox, Pham, and Yepremyan have recently proven that, for almost all positive integers $N$, every abelian group of order $N$ satisfies Alon's conjecture. Extending their result, we verify Alon's conjecture for all (not necessarily abelian) groups of almost all orders. Secondly, we prove a "local" version of Roth's theorem in (many) non-abelian settings with quasi-polynomial bounds, using the recent breakthroughs of Kelley and Meka on Roth's theorem and of Jaber, Liu, Lovett, Ostuni, and Sawhney on the corners problem.