arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper we relate t-designs to a forbidden configuration problem in extremal set theory. Let 1_t 0_l denote a column of t 1's on top of l 0's. We assume t>l. Let q. (1_t 0_l) denote the (t+l)xq matrix consisting of t rows of q 1's and l rows of q 0's. We consider extremal problems for matrices avoiding certain submatrices. Let A be a (0,1)-matrix forbidding any (t+l)x(λ+2) submatrix (λ+2). (1_t 0_l) . Assume A is m-rowed and only columns of sum t+1,t+2,... ,m-l are allowed to be repeated. Assume that A has the maximum number of columns subject to the given restrictions. Assume m is sufficiently large. Then A has each column of sum 0,1,... ,t and m-l+1,m-l+2,..., m exactly once and, given the appropriate divisibility condition, the columns of sum t+1 correspond to a t-design with block size t+1 and parameter λand there are no other columns. The proof derives a basic upper bound on the number of columns of A by a pigeonhole argument and then a careful argument, for large m, reduces the bound by a substantial amount down to the value given by design based constructions. We extend in a few directions.

Let 1_k 0_l denote the (k+l)\times 1 column of k 1's above l 0's. Let q. (1_k 0_l) $ denote the (k+l)xq matrix with q copies of the column 1_k0_l. A 2-design S_λ(2,3,v) can be defined as a vx(λ/3)\binom{v}{2} (0,1)-matrix with all column sums equal 3 and with no submatrix (λ+1).(1_20_0). Consider an mxn matrix A with all column sums in {3,4,... ,m-1}. Assume m is sufficiently large (with respect to λ) and assume that A has no submatrix which is a row permutation of (λ+1). (1_2 0_1). Then we show the number of columns in A is at most (λ)/3)\binom{m}{3} with equality for A being the columns of column sum 3 corresponding to the triples of a 2-design S_λ(2,3,m). A similar results holds for(λ+1). (1_2 0_2). Define a matrix to be simple if it is a (0,1)-matrix with no repeated columns. Given two matrices A, F, we define A to have F as a configuration if and only if some submatrix of A is a row and column permutation of F. Given m, let forb(m,q.(1_k 0_l)) denote the maximum number of possible columns in a simple m-rowed matrix which has no configuration q.(1_k 0_l). For m sufficiently large with respect to q, we compute exact values for forb(m,q.(1_1 0_1)), forb(m,q.(1_2 0_1)), forb(m,q.(1_2 0_2)). In the latter two cases, we use a construction of Dehon (1983) of simple triple systems S_λ(2,3,v) for λ>1. Moreover for l=1,2, simple mxforb(m,q.(1_2 0_l)) matrices with no configuration q.(1_2 0_l) must arise from simple 2-designs S_λ(2,3,m) of appropriate λ. The proofs derive a basic upper bound by a pigeonhole argument and then use careful counting and Turan's bound, for large m, to reduce the bound. For small m, the larger pigeonhole bounds are sometimes the exact bound. There are intermediate values of m for which we do not know the exact bound.

We introduce a new operation on skew diagrams called composition of transpositions, and use it and a Jacobi-Trudi style formula to derive equalities on skew Schur Q-functions whose indexing shifted skew diagram is an ordinary skew diagram. When this skew diagram is a ribbon, we conjecture necessary and sufficient conditions for equality of ribbon Schur Q-functions. Moreover, we determine all relations between ribbon Schur Q-functions; show they supply a Z-basis for skew Schur Q-functions; assert their irreducibility; and show that the non-commutative analogue of ribbon Schur Q-functions is the flag h-vector of Eulerian posets.