arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the asymptotic diameter of the preferential attachment model $\operatorname{PA}\!_n^{(m,δ)}$ with parameters $m \ge 2$ and $δ> 0$. Building on the recent work \cite{VZ25}, we prove that the diameter of $G_n \sim \operatorname{PA}\!_n^{(m,δ)}$ is $(1+o(1))\log_νn$ with high probability, where $ν$ is the exponential growth rate of the local weak limit of $G_n$. Our result confirms the conjecture in \cite{VZ25} and closes the remaining gap in understanding the asymptotic diameter of preferential attachment graphs with general parameters $m \ge 1$ and $δ>-m$. Our proof follows a general recipe that relates the diameter of a random graph to its typical distance, which we expect to have applicability in a broader range of models.

We investigate the problem of detecting and estimating a changepoint in the attachment function of a network evolving according to a preferential attachment model on $n$ vertices, using only a single final snapshot of the network. Bet et al.~\cite{bet2023detecting} show that a simple test based on thresholding the number of vertices with minimum degrees can detect the changepoint when the change occurs at time $n-Ω(\sqrt{n})$. They further make the striking conjecture that detection becomes impossible for any test if the change occurs at time $n-o(\sqrt{n}).$ Kaddouri et al.~\cite{kaddouri2024impossibility} make a step forward by proving the detection is impossible if the change occurs at time $n-o(n^{1/3}).$ In this paper, we resolve the conjecture affirmatively, proving that detection is indeed impossible if the change occurs at time $n-o(\sqrt{n}).$ Furthermore, we establish that estimating the changepoint with an error smaller than $o(\sqrt{n})$ is also impossible, thereby confirming that the estimator proposed in Bhamidi et al.~\cite{bhamidi2018change} is order-optimal.