arXiv++ Combinatorics

A subtraction game is played on a heap of tokens. The players take turns removing s tokens for some s in a fixed set S of positive integers, and the player who cannot move loses. The sequence of Sprague-Grundy values of such a game is eventually periodic. We ask when it is purely periodic, meaning periodic from the very start, for the three-move sets S={a,b,c} with 0<a<b<c. After reduction to primitive rulesets with a>=2, we give an explicit sufficient criterion for pure periodicity. For every non-additive set that satisfies it we determine the least period, all P-positions in closed form, and all nim-values, and the additive case c=a+b is treated separately. We conjecture that the criterion is also necessary, and we prove this for the period a+b whenever c>=2(a+b). The criterion is a finite test on the angle rho = c mod (a+b), built from the P-position pattern of the two-move game {a,b}, and the admissible angles form explicit unions of arcs in Z/(a+b)Z.

We consider a subtraction Nim with subtraction set {s_1,s_2,s_3={2,4n,4n+2}, where n is a positive integer such that n >= 3. We do not treat the case that n=1 or n=2 in this article. We show that this game satisfies the reverse-mex property of Grundy numbers, i.e., G(x)=mex{G(x+s_1), G(x+s_2), G(x+s_3)}, where the mex is taken over successors rather than predecessors. We modify the rule of this subtraction Nim to allow a one-time pass, that is, a passing move usable at most once during the game, unavailable from terminal positions; once used by either player, it becomes unavailable. In classical Nim, the introduction of a pass move complicates the game, and finding a formula that describes the set of P-positions in traditional three-pile Nim with a pass remains an important open question. In the case of subtraction Nim with a pass, however, the introduction of a pass move does not complicate the game. We prove that this game still satisfies the reverse-mex property of Grundy numbers when a pass move is available.

We determine the full nim-value structure of additive subtraction games in the {\em primitive quadratic} regime. The problem appears in Winning Ways by Berlekamp et al. in 1982; it includes a closed formula, involving Beatty-type {\em bracket expressions} on rational moduli, for determining the P-positions, but to the best of our knowledge, a complete proof of this claim has not yet appeared in the literature; Miklós and Post (2024) established outcome-periodicity, but without reference to that closed formula. The primitive quadratic case captures the source of the quadratic complexity of the problem, a claim supported by recent research in the dual setting of sink subtraction with Bhagat et al. This study focuses on a number theoretic solution involving the classical closed formula, and we establish that each nim-value sequence resides on a linear shift of the classical P-positions.

Subtraction games are a classical topic in Combinatorial Game Theory. A result of Golomb~(1966) shows that every subtraction game with a finite move set has an eventually periodic nim-sequence, but the known proof yields only an exponential upper bound on the period length. Flammenkamp (1997) conjectures a striking classification for three-move subtraction games: non-additive rulesets exhibit linear period lengths of the form ``the sum of two moves'', where the choice of which two moves displays fractal-like behavior, while additive sets $S=\{a,b,a+b\}$ have purely periodic outcomes with linear or quadratic period lengths. Despite early attention in \emph{Winning Ways} (1982), the general additive case remains open. We introduce and analyze a dual winning convention, which we call {\sc sink subtraction}. Unlike the standard wall convention, where moves to negative positions are forbidden, the sink convention declares a player the winner upon moving to a non-positive position. We show that {\sc additive sink subtraction} admits a complete solution: the nim-sequence is purely periodic with an explicit linear or quadratic period formula, and we conjecture a duality between additive sink subtraction and classical wall subtraction. Keywords: Additive Subtraction Game, Nimber, Periodicity, Sink Convention.

{\sc Yama Nim} is a variant of two piles {\sc Nim}. In this ruleset, the player chosses one of the piles and removes at least two tokens from the pile. In the same move, the player adds one token to the other pile. We show the winning strategies and SG-values of this ruleset. In addition, we introduce a generalization of {\sc Yama Nim}, named {\sc Digraph Yama Nim}. In this ruleset, a digraph is given and there are some tokens on each vertex of the digraph. Each player, in their turn, chooses one vertex and removes at least its out-degree plus one tokens from the vertex. Furthermore, one token is added to each vertex to which a directed edge from the chosen vertex is connected. We show that the winner determination problem of {\sc Digraph Yama Nim} is PSPACE-complete even when the input graph is bipartite and directed acyclic. Despite this, there are some cases that can be solved easily and we show them.

Here, we present a variant of the sliding coins game. Two coins are placed on distinct squares of a semi-infinite linear board with squares numbered $0, 1, 2, dots, $. Two players take turns and move a coin to a lower unoccupied square. When a coin is pushed to the outside of the linear board, the players cannot use this coin anymore. In this game, we have another operation of moving coins: moving the coin on the right leftward and pushing the coin on the left. This last operation complicates this game's mathematical structure, but we have managed to make formulas for Grundy numbers. Since all the positions of this game of two coins are the next player's winning position, this game of two coins is trivial as a game. However, by making the sum of two games, we get a meaningful game in which the player who plays for the last time is the winner. With these Grundy numbers formulae, we get the winning strategy.

In this paper, we consider two-player impartial games with a pass-move. A disjunctive compound of games is a position in which, on each turn, the current player chooses one of the components and makes a legal move in it. For disjunctive compounds, it is known that the time to determine which player has a winning strategy is bounded by the time to compute the SG-values of the components plus the time for their XOR. However, if we allow a pass-move during the play, the analysis of such games becomes much more difficult. A pass-move allows each player to skip exactly one turn in non-terminal positions during the game, after which neither player may use a pass-move again. We establish a homomorphism on the SG-values of games with a pass-move. That is, if every component satisfies a condition called one-move game, the SG-value of the disjunctive compound of the components with a pass-move is the same as the SG-value of nim with a pass-move where the size of every pile is the same as the SG-value of every component of the compound. This guarantees that the time to determine which player has a winning strategy in a disjunctive compound with a pass can be bounded by the sum of the time to determine SG-values of all components without a pass and a position in nim with a pass. We also show how the homomorphism is used for determining SG-values of some chocolate games.

In an amalgamation Nim, players are allowed to use a move from the traditional form of Nim or to amalgamate two piles when they are not empty. No formula that describes the set of P-positions of Amalgamation Nim is known. The author gives a condition on the amalgamation of two piles. Players can amalgamate two piles only when the number of stones in these two piles is equal to or more than 2. Then, we get a formula that describes the set of P-positions for this variant of amalgamation Nim.

In this study, we study a Josephus problem algorithm. Let $n,k$ be positive integers and $g_k(n) = \left\lfloor \frac{n}{k-1} \right\rfloor +1$, where $ \left\lfloor \ \ \right\rfloor$ is a floor function. Suppose that there exists $p$ such that $g_{k}^{p-1}(0) < n(k-1) \leq g_{k}^{p}(0)$, where $g_{k}^p$ is the $p$-th functional power of $g_k$. Then, the last number that remains is $nk-h2_{k}^{p}(0)$ in the Josephus problem of $n$ numbers, where every $k$-th numbers are removed. This algorithm is based on Maximum Nim with the rule function $f_k(n)=\left\lfloor \frac{n}{k} \right\rfloor$. Using the present article's result, we can build a new algorithm for Josephus problem.

In this study, we study the relation between Grundy numbers of a Maximum Nim and Josephus problem. Let f(x) = floor(x/k), where floor( ) is the floor function and k is a positive integer. We prove that there is a simple relation with a Maximum Nim with the rule function f and the Josephus problem in which every k-th numbers are to be removed.

Here, we present a variant of Nim with two piles. In the first pile, we have stones with a weight of 1, and in the second pile, we have stones with a weight of -2. Two Players take turns to take stones from one of the piles, and the total weight of stones to be removed should be equal to or less than half of the total weight of the stones in the pile. The player who removed the last stone or stones is the winner of the game. The authors discovered that when (n,m) is a previous player's winning position, 2m+1 is the last remaining number of the Josephus problem, where there are n -numbers, and every second number is to be removed. There are similar relations between the position of which the Grundy number is s and the (n-s)-th removed number.

The authors present formulas for the previous player's winning positions of two variants of restricted Nim. In both of these two games, there is one pile of stones, and in the first variant, we investigate the case that in k-th turn, you can remove f(k) stones at most, where f is a function whose values are natural numbers. In the second variant, there are two kinds of stones. The Type 1 group consists of stones with the weight of one, and the Type 2 group consists of stones with the weight of two. When the total weight of stones is a, you can remove stones whose total weight is equal to or less than half of a.

The class of Poset Take-Away games includes many interesting and difficult games. Playing on an $n$-dimensional positive quadrant (the origin being the bottom of the poset) gives rise to nim, wythoff's nim and chomp. These are impartial games. We introduce a partisan game motivated by chomp and the recent chocolate-bar version. Our game is played on a chocolate bar with alternately flavored pieces (or a checkerboard). We solve this game by showing it is equivalent to blue-red hackenbush strings. This equivalence proves that the values of game are numbers and it gives an algorithm for optimal play when there is more than one chocolate bar. The checkerboard interpretation leads to many natural questions.

In this paper, we consider impartial and partizan restricted chocolate bar games. In impartial restricted chocolate bar games, players cut a chocolate bar into two pieces along any horizontal or vertical line and eat whichever piece is smaller. If the two pieces are the same size, a player can eat either one. In constrast, partizan restricted chocolate bar games include players designated as Left and Right and chocolate bars with black and white stripes. Left cuts the chocolate bar in two as above and eats the part with fewer black blocks. Similarly, Right cuts the bar and eats the part with fewer white blocks. A player loses when they cannot eat the remaining chocolate bar. We provide formulas that describe the winning positions of the previous player, Right, and Left players. We also present an interesting similarity in the graphs of previous players' winning positions for impartial and partizan chocolate bar games.

Chocolate-bar games are variants of the CHOMP game. A three-dimensional chocolate bar comprises a set of cubic boxes sized 1 X 1 X 1, with a bitter cubic box at the bottom of the column at position (0,0). For non-negative integers u,w such that u < x and w \< z, the height of the column at position (u,w) is min (F(u,w),y) +1, where F is a monotonically increasing function. We denote this chocolate bar as CB(F,x,y,z). Each player, in turn, cuts the bar on a plane that is horizontal or vertical along the grooves, and eats the broken piece. The player who manages to leave the opponent with the single bitter cubic box is the winner. In this study, functions F such that the Sprague--Grundy value of CB(F,x,y,z) is x xor y xor z are characterized. We have already published the research on three-dimensional chocolate games. In this paper, the authors study a multi-dimensional chocolate game, where the dimension is more than three, and apply the theory to the problem of pass move in Nim. We modify the standard rules of the game to allow a one-time pass, that is, a pass move that may be used at most once in the game and not from a terminal position. Once a pass has been used by either player, it is no longer available. It is well-known that in classical Nim, the introduction of the pass alters the underlying structure of the game, significantly increasing its complexity. A multi-dimensional chocolate game can show a perspective on the complexity of the game of Nim with a pass. Therefore, the authors address a longstanding open question in combinatorial game theory. The authors present this paper, since their discovery seems to be significant. It appears to the authors that the relation between chocolate games and Nim with a pass will be an essential research topic soon.

This paper presents a study of restricted Nim with a pass. In the restricted Nim considered in this study, two players take turns and remove stones from the piles. In each turn, when the number of stones is m, each player is allowed to remove at least one stone and at most the ceiling of m/2 stones from a pile of m stones. The standard rules of the game are modified to allow a one-time pass, that is, a pass move that may be used at most once in the game and not from a terminal position. Once a pass has been used by either player, it is no longer available. It is well-known that in classical Nim, the introduction of the pass alters the underlying structure of the game, significantly increasing its complexity. In the restricted Nim considered in this study, the pass move was found to have a minimal impact. There is a simple relationship between the Grundy numbers of restricted Nim and the Grundy numbers of restricted Nim with a pass, where the number of piles can be any natural number. Therefore, the authors address a longstanding open question in combinatorial game theory: the extent to which the introduction of a pass into a game affects its behavior. The game that we developed appears to be the first variant of Nim that is fully solvable when a pass is not allowed and remains fully solvable following the introduction of a pass move.

In this study, we investigate three-dimensional chocolate bar games, which are variants of the game of Chomp. A three-dimensional chocolate bar is a three-dimensional array of cubes in which a bitter cubic box is present in some part of the bar. Two players take turns and cut the bar horizontally or vertically along the grooves. The player who manages to leave the opponent with a single bitter block is the winner. We consider the P-positions of this game, where the P-positions are positions of the game from which the previous player (the player who will play after the next player) can force a win, as long as they play correctly at every stage. We present sufficient conditions for the case when the position {p,q,r} is a P-position if and only if the bitxor of p-1, q-1, r-1, where p, q and r are the length, height, and width of the chocolate bar, respectively.

This paper describes Wythoff's game with a pass, which is a variant of the classical Wythoff's game. The classical form is played with two piles of stones, from which two players take turns to remove stones from one or both piles. When removing stones from both piles, an equal number must be removed from each. The player who removes the last stone or stones is the winner. In Wythoff's game with a pass, we modify the standard rules to allow for a one-time pass, i.e., a pass move that may be used at most once in a game but not from a terminal position. Once either player has used the pass, it is no longer available. We denote the position of the game by (x,y,p) , where x,y are numbers of stones in two piles and p=1 if a pass is available, and p=0 if not. The authors proved that for (x,y,1) with x <= 9 or y x <= 9 , (x,y,1) is a P-position (the previous player's winning position) if and only if the Grundy number of (x,y,0) is 1 . Therefore, by using the result by U. Blass and A.S. Fraenkel, the Euclid distance between each previous player's winning position in Wythoff's game with a pass and a nearby previous player's winning position in Wythoff's game without a pass is within square root of 20 .