arXiv++ Combinatorics

In an impartial combinatorial game, both players have the same options in the game and all its subpositions. The classical Sprague-Grundy Theory was developed for short impartial games, where players have a finite number of options, there are no special moves, and an infinite run is not possible. Subsequently, many generalizations have been proposed, particularly the Smith-Frankel-Perl Theory devised for games where the infinite run is possible, and the Larsson-Nowakowski-Santos Theory able to deal with entailing moves that disrupt the logic of the disjunctive sum. This work presents a generalization that combines these two theories, suitable for analyzing cyclic impartial games with carry-on moves, which are particular cases of entailing moves where the entailed player has no freedom of choice in their response. This generalization is illustrated with sc green-lime hackenbush, a game inspired by the classic green hackenbush.

Misère games in general have little algebraic structure, but if the games under consideration have properties then some algebraic structure re-appears. In 2023, the class of Blocking games was identified. Misère Cricket Pitch was suggested as a problem at the Games-at-Dal-2023 Workshop, and is the first game in this class to be studied. Normal play Cricket Pitch was analyzed in 2011. The game involves flattening `bumps' with a roller. The main reduction of normal play, reducing every bump by $2$, is not applicable in misère play. In this paper, we find the outcomes of single (linear) component \textsc{cricket pitch} positions, where the proof is based on first considering the bumps to the left and to the right of the roller separately. We also give reductions, true in Blocking games in general, of positions that occur in simple positions of Cricket Pitch. These allow us to find the outcomes of the disjunctive sum of single bump positions. At the time of writing, it was not possible to find game values since the relevant theory for Blocking games does not exist.

Chopsticks is a game played by two players where they start with one finger raised on each hand. On their turn, each player moves by pointing an attacking hand at one of their opponent's hands. The number of fingers on the pointed hand increases by the number of fingers on the attacking hand. If, after a move, a hand contains more than five fingers, it is removed from play. There are also other rules that allow players to move fingers from one hand to another, but we focus on this simple setup. We introduce a generalization of Chopsticks, called Simple Chopsticks, in which the players may have any number of $n$-fingered hands. We find that having more hands than your opponent is generally good, and use this fact to fully characterize the outcomes of \octopus/ in the case where the players have 2-fingered hands.

There are many combinatorial games in which a move can terminate the game, such as a checkmate in chess. These moves give rise to diverse situations that fall outside the scope of the classical normal play structure. To analyze these games, an algebraic extension is necessary, including infinities as elements. In this work, affine normal play, the algebraic structure resulting from that extension, is analyzed. We prove that it is possible to compare two affine games using only their forms. Furthermore, affine games can still be reduced, although the reduced forms are not unique. We establish that the classical normal play is order-embedded in the extended structure, constituting its substructure of invertible elements. Additionally, as in classical theory, affine games born by day n form a lattice with respect to the partial order of games.

The class of Poset Take-Away games includes many interesting and difficult games. Playing on an $n$-dimensional positive quadrant (the origin being the bottom of the poset) gives rise to nim, wythoff's nim and chomp. These are impartial games. We introduce a partisan game motivated by chomp and the recent chocolate-bar version. Our game is played on a chocolate bar with alternately flavored pieces (or a checkerboard). We solve this game by showing it is equivalent to blue-red hackenbush strings. This equivalence proves that the values of game are numbers and it gives an algorithm for optimal play when there is more than one chocolate bar. The checkerboard interpretation leads to many natural questions.

In Combinatorial Game Theory, short game forms are defined recursively over all the positions the two players are allowed to move to. A form is decomposable if it can be expressed as a disjunctive sum of two forms with smaller birthday. If there are no such summands, then the form is indecomposable. The main contribution of this document is the characterization of the indecomposable nimbers and the characterization of the indecomposable numbers. More precisely, a nimber is indecomposable if and only if its size is a power of two, and a number is indecomposable if and only if its absolute value is less or equal than one.

Combinatorial Game Theory typically studies sequential rulesets with perfect information where two players alternate moves. There are rulesets with {\em entailing moves} that break the alternating play axiom and/or restrict the other player's options within the disjunctive sum components. Although some examples have been analyzed in the classical work Winning Ways, such rulesets usually fall outside the scope of the established normal play mathematical theory. At the first Combinatorial Games Workshop at MSRI, John H. Conway proposed that an effort should be made to devise some nontrivial ruleset with entailing moves that had a complete analysis. Recently, Larsson, Nowakowski, and Santos proposed a more general theory, {\em affine impartial}, which facilitates the mathematical analysis of impartial rulesets with entailing moves. Here, by using this theory, we present a complete solution for a nontrivial ruleset with entailing moves.

We discuss games involving a counterfeit coin. Given one counterfeit coin among a number of otherwise identical coins, two players with full knowledge of the fake coin take turns weighing coins on a two-pan scale, under the condition that on every turn they reveal some information to an Observer with limited prior knowledge about the coins. We study several games depending on the types of the counterfeit coin, the end-game condition, and the availability of extra genuine coins. We present the winning positions and the Grundy numbers for these games.

We consider Flipping Coins, a partizan version of the impartial game Turning Turtles, played on lines of coins. We show the values of this game are numbers, and these are found by first applying a reduction, then decomposing the position into an iterated ordinal sum. This is unusual since moves in the middle of the line do not eliminate the rest of the line. Moreover, when $G$ is decomposed into lines $H$ and $K$, then $G=(H:K^R)$. This is in contrast to Hackenbush Strings where $G= (H:K)$.

Combinatorial Game Theory has also been called `additive game theory', whenever the analysis involves sums of independent game components. Such {\em disjunctive sums} invoke comparison between games, which allows abstract values to be assigned to them. However, there are rulesets with {\em entailing moves} that break the alternating play axiom and/or restrict the other player's options within the disjunctive sum components. These situations are exemplified in the literature by a ruleset such as {\sc nimstring}, a normal play variation of the classical children's game {\sc dots \& boxes}, and {\sc top~entails}, an elegant ruleset introduced in the classical work Winning Ways, by Berlekamp Conway and Guy. Such rulesets fall outside the scope of the established normal play theory. Here, we axiomatize normal play via two new terminating games, $\infty$ (Left wins) and $\overline\infty$ (Right wins), and a more general theory is achieved. We define {\em affine impartial}, which extends classical impartial games, and we analyze their algebra by extending the established Sprague-Grundy theory, with an accompanying minimum excluded rule. Solutions of {\sc nimstring} and {\sc top~entails} are given to illustrate the theory.

When are all positions of a game numbers? We show that two properties are necessary and sufficient. These properties are consequences of that, in a number, it is not an advantage to be the first player. One of these properties implies the other. However, checking for one or the other, rather than just one, can often be accomplished by only looking at the positions on the `board'. If the stronger property holds for all positions, then the values are integers.

Partizan subtraction games are combinatorial games where two players, say Left and Right, alternately remove a number n of tokens from a heap of tokens, with $n \in S_L$ (resp. $n \in S_R$) when it is Left's (resp. Right's) turn. The first player unable to move loses. These games were introduced by Fraenkel and Kotzig in 1987, where they introduced the notion of dominance, i.e. an asymptotic behavior of the outcome sequence where Left always wins if the heap is sufficiently large. In the current paper, we investigate the other kinds of behaviors for the outcome sequence. In addition to dominance, three other disjoint behaviors are defined, namely weak dominance, fairness and ultimate impartiality. We consider the problem of computing this behavior with respect to $S_L$ and $S_R$, which is connected to the well-known Frobenius coin problem. General results are given, together with arithmetic and geometric characterizations when the sets $S_L$ and $S_R$ have size at most 2.

We present two rulesets, Domino Shave and Clockwise Hackenbush. The first is somehow natural and, as special cases, includes Stirling Shave and Hetyei's Bernoulli game. Clockwise Hackenbush seems artificial yet it is equivalent to Domino Shave. From the pictorial form of the game, and a knowledge of Hackenbush, the decomposition into ordinal sums is immediate. The values of Clockwise Blue-Red Hackenbush are numbers and we provide an explicit formula for the ordinal sum of numbers where the literal form of the base is $\{x\,|\,\}$ or $\{\,|\,x\}$, and $x$ is a number. That formula generalizes van Roode's signed binary number method for Blue-Red Hackenbush.

We define an all-small ruleset, Bipass, within the framework of normal-play combinatorial games. A game is played on finite strips of black and white stones. Stones of different colors are swapped provided they do not bypass one of their own kind. We find a surjective function from the strips to integer atomic weights (Berlekamp, Conway and Guy 1982) that measures the number of units in all-small games. This result provides explicit winning strategies for many games, and in cases where it does not, it gives narrow bounds for the canonical form game values. We prove that the game value *2 does not appear as a disjunctive sum of Bipass. Moreover, we find game values for some parametrized families of games, including an infinite number of strips of value *.

The 'Cheating Robot' version of Cops and Robbers is played on a finite, simple, connected graph. The players move in the same time period. However, before moving, the robot observes to which vertices the cops are moving and it is fast enough to complete its move in the time period. The cops also know that the robot will use this information. More cops are required to capture a robot than to capture a robber. Indeed, the minimum degree is a lower bound on the number of cops required to capture a robot. Only on a tree is one cop guaranteed to capture a robot, although two cops are sufficient to capture both a robber and a robot on outerplanar graphs. In graphs where retracts are involved, we show how cop strategies against a robber can be modified to capture a robot. This approach gives exact numbers for hypercubes, and $k$-dimensional grids in general.

Combinatorial games are two-player games of pure strategy where the players, usually called Left and Right, move alternately. In this paper, we introduce Cheating Robot games. These arise from simultaneous-play combinatorial games where one player has insider information ('cheats'). Play occurs in rounds. At the beginning of a round, both players know the moves that are available to them. Left chooses a move. Knowing Left's move, Right then chooses a move. Right's move is not constrained by Left's choice. The round is not completed until both players have made a choice. A game is finished only when one or both players do not have a move at the beginning of a round. Right choosing a move, knowing Left's, makes the games deterministic, distinguishing them from simultaneous games. Also, the ending condition distinguishes this class of games from combinatorial games, since the outcomes are now Left-win, Right-win and draw. The basic theory and properties are developed, including showing that there is an equivalence relation and partial order on the games. Whilst there are no inverses in the class of all games, we show that there is a sub-class, simple hot games, in which the integers have inverses. In this sub-class, the optimal strategies are obtained by the solutions to a minimum-weight matching problem on a graph whose number of vertices equals the number of summands in the disjunctive sum.

For combinatorial games, temperature is a measure of the volatility, that is, by how much the advantage can change. Typically, the temperature has been measured for individual positions within specific games. In this paper, we give the first general upper bounds on the temperature for any class of games. For a position $G$, the closure of the set of numbers $\{g\}$ such that $G-g$ is a first player win, is called the confusion interval of $G$. Let $\ell(G)$ be the length of this interval. Our first main result is: For a class of games $\mathscr{S}$, if there are constants $J$ and $K$ such that $\ell(G^L),\ell(G^R)\leq J$ and $\ell(G)\leq K$ for for every $G\in \mathscr{S}$, then the temperature of every game is bounded by $K/2+J$. We give an example to show that this bound is tight. Our second main result is a method to find a bound for the confusion intervals. In $G^L-G$ when Left gets to go first, the number of passing moves required by Right to win gives an upper bound on $\ell(G)$. This is the first general upper bound on temperature. As examples of the bound and the method, we give upper bounds on the temperature of subclasses of Domineering and Snort.

Combinatorial game theory (CGT), as introduced by Berlekamp, Conway and Guy, involves two players who move alternately in a perfect information, zero-sum game, and there are no chance devices. Also the games have the finite descent property (every game terminates in a finite number of moves). The two players are usually called Left and Right. The games often break up into components and the players must choose one of the components in which to play. One main aim of CGT is to analyze the components individually (rather than analyzing the sum as a whole) then use this information to analyze the sum. In this paper, the players move simultaneously in a combinatorial game. Three sums are considered which are defined by the termination rules: (i) one component does not have a simultaneous move; (ii) no component has a simultaneous move; (iii) one player has no move in any component. These are combined with a winning convention which is either: (i) based on which player has moves remaining; or (ii) the greatest score. In each combination, we show that equality of games induces an equivalence relation and the equivalence classes are partially ordered. Also, where possible, given games $A$ and $B$, we give checks to determine if Left prefers to replace $A$ by $B$ in a sum.

Absolute Universes of combinatorial games, as defined in a recent paper by the same authors, include many standard short normal- misère- and scoring-play monoids. In this note we show that the class is categorical, by extending Joyal's construction of arrows in normal-play games. Given $G$ and $H$ in an Absolute Universe $U$, we study instead the Left Provisonal Game $[G, H]$, which is a normal-play game, independently of the particular Absolute Universe, and find that $G\longrightarrow H$ (implying $G\succcurlyeq H$) corresponds to the set of winning strategies for Left playing second in $[G,H]$. By this we define the category ${\bf LNP(U)}$.

Strong placement games (SP-games) are a class of combinatorial games whose structure allows one to describe the game via simplicial complexes. A natural question is whether well-known invariants of combinatorial games, such as "game value", appear as invariants of the simplicial complexes. This paper is the first step in that direction. We show that every simplicial complex encodes a certain type of SP-game (called an "invariant SP-game") whose ruleset is independent of the board it is played on. We also show that in the class of SP-games isomorphic simplicial complexes correspond to isomorphic game trees, and hence equal game values. We also study a subclass of SP-games corresponding to flag complexes, showing that there is always a game whose corresponding complex is a flag complex no matter which board it is played on.