arXiv++ Combinatorics

We introduce the game of Cops and Eternal Robbers played on graphs, where there are infinitely many robbers that appear sequentially over distinct plays of the game. A positive integer $t$ is fixed, and the cops are required to capture the robber in at most $t$ time-steps in each play. The associated optimization parameter is the eternal cop number, denoted by $c_t^{\infty},$ which equals the eternal domination number in the case $t=1,$ and the cop number for sufficiently large $t.$ We study the complexity of Cops and Eternal Robbers, and show that game is NP-hard when $t$ is a fixed constant and EXPTIME-complete for large values of $t$. We determine precise values of $c_t^{\infty}$ for paths and cycles. The eternal cop number is studied for retracts, and this approach is applied to give bounds for trees, as well as for strong and Cartesian grids.

We introduce a new directed graph model for social networks, based on the transitivity of triads. In the Iterated Local Directed Transitivity (ILDT) model, new nodes are born over discrete time-steps, and inherit the link structure of their parent nodes. The ILDT model may be viewed as a directed analogue of the ILT model for undirected graphs introduced in \cite{ilt}. We investigate network science and graph theoretical properties of ILDT digraphs. We prove that the ILDT model exhibits a densification power law, so that the digraphs generated by the models densify over time. The number of directed triads are investigated, and counts are given of the number of directed 3-cycles and transitive $3$-cycles. A higher number of transitive 3-cycles are generated by the ILDT model, as found in real-world, on-line social networks. In many instances of the chosen initial digraph, the model eventually generates graphs with Hamiltonian directed cycles. We finish with a discussion of the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrices of ILDT directed graphs, and provide further directions.

Combinatorial game theory (CGT), as introduced by Berlekamp, Conway and Guy, involves two players who move alternately in a perfect information, zero-sum game, and there are no chance devices. Also the games have the finite descent property (every game terminates in a finite number of moves). The two players are usually called Left and Right. The games often break up into components and the players must choose one of the components in which to play. One main aim of CGT is to analyze the components individually (rather than analyzing the sum as a whole) then use this information to analyze the sum. In this paper, the players move simultaneously in a combinatorial game. Three sums are considered which are defined by the termination rules: (i) one component does not have a simultaneous move; (ii) no component has a simultaneous move; (iii) one player has no move in any component. These are combined with a winning convention which is either: (i) based on which player has moves remaining; or (ii) the greatest score. In each combination, we show that equality of games induces an equivalence relation and the equivalence classes are partially ordered. Also, where possible, given games $A$ and $B$, we give checks to determine if Left prefers to replace $A$ by $B$ in a sum.

We study the computational complexity of distance games, a class of combinatorial games played on graphs. A move consists of colouring an uncoloured vertex subject to it not being at certain distances determined by two sets, D and S. D is the set of forbidden distances for colouring vertices in different colors, while S is the set of forbidden distances for the same colour. The last player to move wins. Well-known examples of distance games are Node-Kayles, Snort, and Col, whose complexities were shown to be PSPACE-hard. We show that many more distance games are also PSPACE-hard.