arXiv++ Combinatorics

We show that there is some absolute constant $c>0$, such that for any union-closed family $\mathcal{F} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$, if \mbox{$|\mathcal{F}| \geq (\frac{1}{2}-c)2^n$}, then there is some element $i \in [n]$ that appears in at least half of the sets of $\mathcal{F}$. We also show that for any union-closed family $\mathcal{F} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$, the number of sets which are not in $\mathcal{F}$ that cover a set in $\mathcal{F}$ is at most $2^{n-1}$, and provide examples where the inequality is tight.

We show that the Right-Angled Coxeter group $C=C(G)$ associated to a random graph $G\sim \mathcal{G}(n,p)$ with $\frac{\log n + \log\log n + ω(1)}{n} \leq p < 1- ω(n^{-2})$ virtually algebraically fibers. This means that $C$ has a finite index subgroup $C'$ and a finitely generated normal subgroup $N\subset C'$ such that $C'/N \cong \mathbb{Z}$. We also obtain the corresponding hitting time statements, more precisely, we show that as soon as $G$ has minimum degree at least 2 and as long as it is not the complete graph, then $C(G)$ virtually algebraically fibers. The result builds upon the work of Jankiewicz, Norin, and Wise and it is essentially best possible.

A vertex ranking of a graph is an assignment of ranks (or colors) to the vertices of the graph, in such a way that any simple path connecting two vertices of equal rank, must contain a vertex of a higher rank. In this paper we study a relaxation of this notion, in which the requirement above should only hold for paths of some bounded length $l$ for some fixed $l$. For instance, already the case $l=2$ exhibit quite a different behavior than proper coloring. We prove upper and lower bounds on the minimum number of ranks required for several graph families, such as trees, planar graphs, graphs excluding a fixed minor and degenerate graphs.

We prove that the sensitivity of any non-trivial graph property on $n$ vertices is at least $\lfloor \frac{1}{2}n \rfloor$ , provided $n$ is sufficiently large.

A balanced pattern of order $2d$ is an element $P \in \{+,-\}^{2d}$, where both signs appear $d$ times. Two sets $A,B \subset [n]$ form $P$-pattern, which we denote by $\operatorname{pat}(A,B) = P$, if $A\triangle B = \{j_1,\ldots ,j_{2d}\}$ with $1\leq j_1<\cdots < j_{2d}\leq n$ and $\{i\in [2d]: P_i = + \} = \{i\in [2d]: j_i \in A \setminus B\}$. We say ${\cal A} \subset {\cal P}[n]$ is $P$-free if $\operatorname{pat}(A,B)\neq P$ for all $A,B \in {\cal A}$. We consider the following extremal question: how large can a family ${\cal A} \subset {\cal P}[n]$ be if ${\cal A} $ is $P$-free? We prove a number of results on the sizes of such families. In particular, we show that for some fixed $c>0$, if $P$ is a $d$-balanced pattern with $d < c \log \log n$ then $|{\cal A}| = o(2^n)$. We then give stronger bounds in the cases when (i) $P$ consists of $d$ $+$ signs, followed by $d$ $-$ signs and (ii) $P$ consists of alternating signs. In both cases, if $d = o(\sqrt n)$ then $|{\cal A} | = o(2^n)$. In the case of (i), this is tight. .