arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $G$ be an $n$-vertex oriented graph. Let $t(G)$ (respectively $i(G)$) be the probability that a random set of $3$ vertices of $G$ spans a transitive triangle (respectively an independent set). We prove that $t(G) + i(G) \geq \frac{1}{9}-o_n(1)$. Our proof uses the method of flag algebras that we supplement with several steps that make it more easily comprehensible. We also prove a stability result and an exact result. Namely, we describe an extremal construction, prove that it is essentially unique, and prove that if $H$ is sufficiently far from that construction, then $t(H) + i(H)$ is significantly larger than $\frac{1}{9}$. We go to greater technical detail than is usually done in papers that rely on flag algebras. Our hope is that as a result this text can serve others as a useful introduction to this powerful and beautiful method.

Consider the random process in which the edges of a graph $G$ are added one by one in a random order. A classical result states that if $G$ is the complete graph $K_{2n}$ or the complete bipartite graph $K_{n,n}$, then typically a perfect matching appears at the moment at which the last isolated vertex disappears. We extend this result to arbitrary $k$-regular bipartite graphs $G$ on $2n$ vertices for all $k = ω\left( \frac{n}{\log^{1/3} n} \right)$. Surprisingly, this is not the case for smaller values of $k$. Using a construction due to Goel, Kapralov and Khanna, we show that there exist bipartite $k$-regular graphs in which the last isolated vertex disappears long before a perfect matching appears.

A coloured version of classic extremal problems dates back to Erdős and Rothschild, who in 1974 asked which $n$-vertex graph has the maximum number of 2-edge-colourings without monochromatic triangles. They conjectured that the answer is simply given by the largest triangle-free graph. Since then, this new class of coloured extremal problems has been extensively studied by various researchers. In this paper we pursue the Erdős--Rothschild versions of Sperner's Theorem, the classic result in extremal set theory on the size of the largest antichain in the Boolean lattice, and Erdős' extension to $k$-chain-free families. Given a family $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of $[n]$, we define an $(r,k)$-colouring of $\mathcal{F}$ to be an $r$-colouring of the sets without any monochromatic $k$-chains $F_1 \subset F_2 \subset \dots \subset F_k$. We prove that for $n$ sufficiently large in terms of $k$, the largest $k$-chain-free families also maximise the number of $(2,k)$-colourings. We also show that the middle level, $\binom{[n]}{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$, maximises the number of $(3,2)$-colourings, and give asymptotic results on the maximum possible number of $(r,k)$-colourings whenever $r(k-1)$ is divisible by three.

We show that the Right-Angled Coxeter group $C=C(G)$ associated to a random graph $G\sim \mathcal{G}(n,p)$ with $\frac{\log n + \log\log n + ω(1)}{n} \leq p < 1- ω(n^{-2})$ virtually algebraically fibers. This means that $C$ has a finite index subgroup $C'$ and a finitely generated normal subgroup $N\subset C'$ such that $C'/N \cong \mathbb{Z}$. We also obtain the corresponding hitting time statements, more precisely, we show that as soon as $G$ has minimum degree at least 2 and as long as it is not the complete graph, then $C(G)$ virtually algebraically fibers. The result builds upon the work of Jankiewicz, Norin, and Wise and it is essentially best possible.

Let d_i(G) be the density of the 3-vertex i-edge graph in a graph G, i.e., the probability that three random vertices induce a subgraph with i edges. Let S be the set of all quadruples (d_0,d_1,d_2,d_3) that are arbitrary close to 3-vertex graph densities in arbitrary large graphs. Huang, Linial, Naves, Peled and Sudakov have recently determined the projection of the set S to the (d_0,d_3) plane. We determine the projection of the set S to all the remaining planes.

A Hamilton cycle in a graph $Γ$ is a cycle passing through every vertex of $Γ$. A Hamiltonian decomposition of $Γ$ is a partition of its edge set into disjoint Hamilton cycles. One of the oldest results in graph theory is Walecki's theorem from the 19th century, showing that a complete graph $K_n$ on an odd number of vertices $n$ has a Hamiltonian decomposition. This result was recently greatly extended by Kühn and Osthus. They proved that every $r$-regular $n$-vertex graph $Γ$ with even degree $r=cn$ for some fixed $c>1/2$ has a Hamiltonian decomposition, provided $n=n(c)$ is sufficiently large. In this paper we address the natural question of estimating $H(Γ)$, the number of such decompositions of $Γ$. Our main result is that $H(Γ)=r^{(1+o(1))nr/2}$. In particular, the number of Hamiltonian decompositions of $K_n$ is $n^{(1-o(1))n^2/2}$.

Let $T(n)$ denote the maximal number of transversals in an order-$n$ Latin square. Improving on the bounds obtained by McKay et al., Taranenko recently proved that $T(n) \leq \left((1+o(1))\frac{n}{e^2}\right)^{n}$, and conjectured that this bound is tight. We prove via a probabilistic construction that indeed $T(n) = \left((1+o(1))\frac{n}{e^2}\right)^{n}$. Until the present paper, no superexponential lower bound for $T(n)$ was known. We also give a simpler proof of the upper bound.

A classical theorem of Erdos, Lovasz and Spencer asserts that the densities of connected subgraphs in large graphs are independent. We prove an analogue of this theorem for permutations and we then apply the methods used in the proof to give an example of a finitely approximable permutation parameter that is not finitely forcible. The latter answers a question posed by two of the authors and Moreira and Sampaio.

Given a family $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of $[n]$, we say two sets $A, B \in \mathcal{F}$ are comparable if $A \subset B$ or $B \subset A$. Sperner's celebrated theorem gives the size of the largest family without any comparable pairs. This result was later generalised by Kleitman, who gave the minimum number of comparable pairs appearing in families of a given size. In this paper we study a complementary problem posed by Erdős and Daykin and Frankl in the early '80s. They asked for the maximum number of comparable pairs that can appear in a family of $m$ subsets of $[n]$, a quantity we denote by $c(n,m)$. We first resolve an old conjecture of Alon and Frankl, showing that $c(n,m) = o(m^2)$ when $m = n^{ω(1)} 2^{n/2}$. We also obtain more accurate bounds for $c(n,m)$ for sparse and dense families, characterise the extremal constructions for certain values of $m$, and sharpen some other known results.

For a given graph $G$ of minimum degree at least $k$, let $G_p$ denote the random spanning subgraph of $G$ obtained by retaining each edge independently with probability $p=p(k)$. We prove that if $p \ge \frac{\log k + \log \log k + ω_k(1)}{k}$, where $ω_k(1)$ is any function tending to infinity with $k$, then $G_p$ asymptotically almost surely contains a cycle of length at least $k+1$. When we take $G$ to be the complete graph on $k+1$ vertices, our theorem coincides with the classic result on the threshold probability for the existence of a Hamilton cycle in the binomial random graph.

Graphons are analytic objects associated with convergent sequences of dense graphs. Finitely forcible graphons, i.e., those determined by finitely many subgraph densities, are of particular interest because of their relation to various problems in extremal combinatorics and theoretical computer science. Lovasz and Szegedy conjectured that the topological space of typical vertices of a finitely forcible graphon always has finite dimension, which would have implications on the minimum number of parts in its weak eps-regular partition. We disprove the conjecture by constructing a finitely forcible graphon with the space of typical vertices that has infinite dimension.

Graphons are analytic objects associated with convergent sequences of graphs. Problems from extremal combinatorics and theoretical computer science led to a study of graphons determined by finitely many subgraph densities, which are referred to as finitely forcible. Following the intuition that such graphons should have finitary structure, Lovasz and Szegedy conjectured that the topological space of typical vertices of a finitely forcible graphon is always compact. We disprove the conjecture by constructing a finitely forcible graphon such that the associated space is not compact. The construction method gives a general framework for constructing finitely forcible graphons with non-trivial properties.

We investigate when limits of graphs (graphons) and permutations (permutons) are uniquely determined by finitely many densities of their substructures, i.e., when they are finitely forcible. Every permuton can be associated with a graphon through the notion of permutation graphs. We find permutons that are finitely forcible but the associated graphons are not. We also show that all permutons that can be expressed as a finite combination of monotone permutons and quasirandom permutons are finitely forcible, which is the permuton counterpart of the result of Lovasz and Sos for graphons.

For a tree T on n vertices, we study the Maker-Breaker game, played on the edge set of the complete graph on n vertices, which Maker wins as soon as the graph she builds contains a copy of T. We prove that if T has bounded maximum degree, then Maker can win this game within n+1 moves. Moreover, we prove that Maker can build almost every tree on n vertices in n-1 moves and provide non-trivial examples of families of trees which Maker cannot build in n-1 moves.

We show that for every positive epsilon there exist positive delta and n_0 such that every 3-uniform hypergraph on n>=n_0 vertices with the property that every k-vertex subset, where k>=delta*n, induces at least (1/4 + epsilon)*{k \choose 3} edges, contains K4- as a subgraph, where K4- is the 3-uniform hypergraph on 4 vertices with 3 edges. This question was originally raised by Erdos and Sos. The constant 1/4 is the best possible.

Given a coloring of the edges of a multi-hypergraph, a rainbow t-matching is a collection of t disjoint edges, each having a different color. In this note we study the problem of finding a rainbow $t$-matching in an r-partite r-uniform multi-hypergraph whose edges are colored with f colors such that every color class is a matching of size t. This problem was posed by Aharoni and Berger, who asked to determine the minimum number of colors which guarantees a rainbow matching. We improve on the known upper bounds for this problem for all values of the parameters. In particular for every fixed r, we give an upper bound which is polynomial in t, improving the superexponential estimate of Alon. Our proof also works in the setting not requiring the hypergraph to be r-partite.

In this paper we analyze biased Maker-Breaker games and Avoider-Enforcer games, both played on the edge set of a random board $G\sim \gnp$. In Maker-Breaker games there are two players, denoted by Maker and Breaker. In each round, Maker claims one previously unclaimed edge of $G$ and Breaker responds by claiming $b$ previously unclaimed edges. We consider the Hamiltonicity game, the perfect matching game and the $k$-vertex-connectivity game, where Maker's goal is to build a graph which possesses the relevant property. Avoider-Enforcer games are the reverse analogue of Maker-Breaker games with a slight modification, where the two players claim at least 1 and at least $b$ previously unclaimed edges per move, respectively, and Avoider aims to avoid building a graph which possesses the relevant property. Maker-Breaker games are known to be "bias-monotone", that is, if Maker wins the $(1,b)$ game, he also wins the $(1,b-1)$ game. Therefore, it makes sense to define the critical bias of a game, $b^*$, to be the "breaking point" of the game. That is, Maker wins the $(1,b)$ game whenever $b\leq b^*$ and loses otherwise. An analogous definition of the critical bias exists for Avoider-Enforcer games: here, the critical bias of a game $b^*$ is such that Avoider wins the $(1,b)$ game for every $b > b^*$, and loses otherwise. We prove that, for every $p=ω(\frac{\ln n}{n})$, $G\sim\gnp$ is typically such that the critical bias for all the aforementioned Maker-Breaker games is asymptotically $b^*=\frac{np}{\ln n}$. We also prove that in the case $p=Θ(\frac{\ln n}{n})$, the critical bias is $b^*=Θ(\frac{np}{\ln n})$. These results settle a conjecture of Stojaković and Szabó. For Avoider-Enforcer games, we prove that for $p=Ω(\frac{\ln n}{n})$, the critical bias for all the aforementioned games is $b^*=Θ(\frac{np}{\ln n})$.

In this paper we consider biased Maker-Breaker games played on the edge set of a given graph $G$. We prove that for every $δ>0$ and large enough $n$, there exists a constant $k$ for which if $δ(G)\geq δn$ and $χ(G)\geq k$, then Maker can build an odd cycle in the $(1:b)$ game for $b=O(\frac{n}{\log^2 n})$. We also consider the analogous game where Maker and Breaker claim vertices instead of edges. This is a special case of the following well known and notoriously difficult problem due to Duffus, Łuczak and Rödl: is it true that for any positive constants $t$ and $b$, there exists an integer $k$ such that for every graph $G$, if $χ(G)\geq k$, then Maker can build a graph which is not $t$-colorable, in the $(1:b)$ Maker-Breaker game played on the vertices of $G$?

In this paper we study the behaviour of the domination number of the Erdős-Rényi random graph $\mathcal{G}(n,p)$. Extending a result of Wieland and Godbole we show that the domination number of $\mathcal{G}(n,p)$ is equal to one of two values asymptotically almost surely whenever $p \gg \frac{\ln^2n}{\sqrt{n}}$. The explicit values are exactly at the first moment threshold, that is where the expected number of dominating sets starts to tend to infinity. For small $p$ we also provide various non-concentration results which indicate why some sort of lower bound on the probability $p$ is necessary in our first theorem. Concentration, though not on a constant length interval, is proven for every $p\gg 1/n$. These results show that unlike in the case of $p \gg \frac{\ln^2n}{\sqrt{n}}$ where concentration of the domination number happens around the first moment threshold, for $p = O(\ln n/n)$ it does so around the median. In particular, in this range the two are far apart from each other.

We study sufficient conditions for Hamiltonian cycles in hypergraphs, and obtain both Turán- and Dirac-type results. While the Turán-type result gives an exact threshold for the appearance of a Hamiltonian cycle in a hypergraph depending only on the extremal number of a certain path, the Dirac-type result yields a sufficient condition relying solely on the minimum vertex degree.