arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a set H of tournaments, we say H is heroic if every tournament, not containing any member of H as a subtournament, has bounded chromatic number. Berger et al. explicitly characterized all heroic sets containing one tournament. Motivated by this result, we study heroic sets containing two tournaments. We give a necessary condition for a set containing two tournaments to be heroic. We also construct infinitely many minimal heroic sets of size two.

A finite tree $T$ with $|V(T)| \geq 2$ is called {\it automorphism-free} if there is no non-trivial automorphism of $T$. Let $\mathcal{AFT}$ be the poset with the element set of all finite automorphism-free trees (up to graph isomorphism) ordered by $T_1 \preceq T_2$ if $T_1$ can be obtained from $T_2$ by successively deleting one leaf at a time in such a way that each intermediate tree is also automorphism-free. In this paper, we prove that $\mathcal{AFT}$ has a unique minimal element. This result gives an affirmative answer to the question asked by Rupinski.

We say a digraph $G$ is a {\em minor} of a digraph $H$ if $G$ can be obtained from a subdigraph of $H$ by repeatedly contracting a strongly-connected subdigraph to a vertex. Here, we show the class of all tournaments is a well-quasi-order under minor containment.

In the course of proving the strong perfect graph theorem, Chudnovsky, Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas showed that every perfect graph either belongs to one of five basic classes or admits one of several decompositions. Four of the basic classes are closed under taking induced subgraphs (and have known forbidden subgraph characterizations), while the fifth one, consisting of double-split graphs, is not. A graph is doubled if it is an induced subgraph of a double-split graph. We find the forbidden induced subgraph characterization of doubled graphs; it contains 44 graphs.