arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by J. A. Thas

4 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2025-03-08
Arcs, Caps and Generalisations in a Finite Projective Space
Arcs and caps are fundamental structures in finite projective spaces. They can be generalised. Here, a survey is given of some important results on these objects, in particular on generalised ovals and generalised ovoids. The paper also contains recent results and several open problems.
2020-06-09
Covers of generalized quadrangles, 2. Kantor-Knuth covers and embedded ovoids
Published • View PublicationBIB
In this paper, which is a sequel to \cite{part1}, we proceed with our study of covers and decomposition laws for geometries related to generalized quadrangles. In particular, we obtain a higher decomposition law for all Kantor-Knuth generalized quadrangles which generalizes one of the main results in \cite{part1}. In a second part of the paper, we study the set of all Kantor-Knuth ovoids (with given parameter) in a fixed finite parabolic quadrangle, and relate this set to embeddings of parabolic quadrangles into Kantor-Knuth quadrangles. This point of view gives rise to an answer of a question posed in \cite{JATSEP}.
2017-02-03 v2
On k-caps in PG(n, q), with q even and n \geq 3
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let m_2(n, q) be the maximum size of k for which there exists a k-cap in PG(n, q), and let m'_2(n, q) be the second largest value of k for which there exists a complete k-cap in PG(n, q). In this paper Chao's upper bound q^2 - q + 5 for m'_2(3, q), q even and q \geq 8, will be improved. As a corollary new bounds for m_2(n, q), q even, q\geq 8 and n \geq 4, are obtained. Cao and Ou published a better bound but there seems to be a gap in their proof.
2017-01-31 v2
Regular pseudo-hyperovals and regular pseudo-ovals in even characteristic
Published in Innov. Incidence Geom. 17 (2019) 77-84 • View PublicationBIB
S. Rottey and G. Van de Voorde characterized regular pseudo-ovals of PG(3n - 1, q), q = 2^h, h >1 and n prime. Here an alternative proof is given and slightly stronger results are obtained.