arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study sets of integers that can be defined by the vanishing of a generalised polynomial expression. We show that this includes sets of values of linear recurrent sequences of Salem type and some linear recurrent sequences of Pisot type. To this end, we introduce the notion of a generalised polynomial on a number field. We establish a connection between the existence of generalised polynomial expressions for sets of values of linear recurrent sequences and for subsemigroups of multiplicative groups of number fields.

We show that any automatic sequence can be separated into a structured part and a Gowers uniform part in a way that is considerably more efficient than guaranteed by the Arithmetic Regularity Lemma. For sequences produced by strongly connected and prolongable automata, the structured part is rationally almost periodic, while for general sequences the description is marginally more complicated. In particular, we show that all automatic sequences orthogonal to periodic sequences are Gowers uniform. As an application, we obtain for any $l \geq 2$ and any automatic set $A \subset \mathbb{N}_0$ lower bounds on the number of $l$-term arithmetic progressions - contained in $A$ - with a given difference. The analogous result is false for general subsets of $\mathbb{N}_0$ and progressions of length $\geq 5$.

We study substitutive systems generated by nonprimitive substitutions and show that transitive subsystems of substitutive systems are substitutive. As an application we obtain a complete characterisation of the sets of words that can appear as common factors of two automatic sequences defined over multiplicatively independent bases. This generalises the famous theorem of Cobham.

We extend classical results of Rado on partition regularity of systems of linear equations with integer coefficients to the case when the coefficient ring is either an arbitrary integral domain or a noetherian ring. In particular, we show that a system of homogeneous linear equations over an infinite integral domain is partition regular if and only if the corresponding matrix satisfies the columns conditions. The crucial idea is to study partition regularity for general modules rather than only for rings. Contrary to previous techniques, our approach is independent of the characteristic of the coefficient ring.

The aim of this short note is to generalise the result of Rampersad--Shallit saying that an automatic sequence and a Sturmian sequence cannot have arbitrarily long common factors. We show that the same result holds if a Sturmian sequence is replaced by an arbitrary sequence whose terms are given by a generalised polynomial (i.e., an expression involving algebraic operations and the floor function) that is not periodic except for a set of density zero.

Cobham's theorem asserts that if a sequence is automatic with respect to two multiplicatively independent bases, then it is ultimately periodic. We prove a stronger density version of the result: if two sequences which are automatic with respect to two multiplicatively independent bases coincide on a set of density one, then they also coincide on a set of density one with a periodic sequence. We apply the result to a problem of Deshouillers and Ruzsa concerning the least nonzero digit of $n!$ in base $12$.

We conjecture that bounded generalised polynomial functions cannot be generated by finite automata, except for the trivial case when they are ultimately periodic. Using methods from ergodic theory, we are able to partially resolve this conjecture, proving that any hypothetical counterexample is periodic away from a very sparse and structured set. In particular, we show that for a polynomial $p(n)$ with at least one irrational coefficient (except for the constant one) and integer $m\geq 2$, the sequence $\lfloor p(n) \rfloor \bmod{m}$ is never automatic. We also prove that the conjecture is equivalent to the claim that the set of powers of an integer $k\geq 2$ is not given by a generalised polynomial.

We investigate generalised polynomials (i.e. polynomial-like expressions involving the use of the floor function) which take the value $0$ on all integers except for a set of density $0$. Our main result is that the set of integers where a sparse generalised polynomial takes non-zero value cannot contain a translate of an IP set. We also study some explicit constructions, and show that the characteristic functions of the Fibonacci and Tribonacci numbers are given by generalised polynomails. Finally, we show that any sufficiently sparse $\{0,1\}$-valued sequence is given by a generalised polynomial. (This paper is essentially the first half of our earlier submission arXiv:1610.03900 [math.NT]. Because the material in arXiv:1610.03900 [math.NT] touches upon many different subjects, we believe it is preferable to split it into two independent papers.)

We conjecture that bounded generalised polynomial functions cannot be generated by finite automata, except for the trivial case when they are periodic away from a finite set. Using methods from ergodic theory, we are able to partially resolve this conjecture, proving that any hypothetical counterexample is periodic away from a very sparse and structured set. In particular, we show that for a polynomial $p(n)$ with at least one irrational coefficient (except for the constant one) and integer $m$, the sequence $\lfloor p(n) \rfloor \bmod{m}$ is never automatic. We also obtain a conditional result, where we prove the conjecture under the assumption that the characteristic sequence of the set of powers of an integer $k\geq 2$ is not given by a generalised polynomial.

Let $s_{k}(n)$ denote the sum of digits of an integer $n$ in base $k$. Motivated by certain identities of Nieto, and Bateman and Bradley involving sums of the form $\sum_{i=0}^{2^{n}-1}(-1)^{s_{2}(i)}(x+i)^{m}$ for $m=n$ and $m=n+1$, we consider the sequence of polynomials \begin{equation*} f_{m,n}^{\mathbf u}(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{k^{n}-1}ζ_{k}^{s_{k}(i)}(x+{\mathbf u}(i))^{m}. \end{equation*} defined for sequences ${\bf u}(i)$ satisfying a certain recurrence relation. We prove that computing these polynomials is essentially equivalent with computing their constant term and we find an explicit formula for this number. This allows us to prove several interesting identities involving sums of binary digits. We also prove some related results which are of independent interests and can be seen as further generalizations of certain sums involving Prouhet-Thue-Morse sequence.