arXiv++ Combinatorics

Representing graphs by their homomorphism counts has led to the beautiful theory of homomorphism indistinguishability in recent years. Moreover, homomorphism counts have promising applications in database theory and machine learning, where one would like to answer queries or classify graphs solely based on the representation of a graph $G$ as a finite vector of homomorphism counts from some fixed finite set of graphs to $G$. We study the computational complexity of the arguably most fundamental computational problem associated to these representations, the homomorphism reconstructability problem: given a finite sequence of graphs and a corresponding vector of natural numbers, decide whether there exists a graph $G$ that realises the given vector as the homomorphism counts from the given graphs. We show that this problem yields a natural example of an $\mathsf{NP}^{#\mathsf{P}}$-hard problem, which still can be $\mathsf{NP}$-hard when restricted to a fixed number of input graphs of bounded treewidth and a fixed input vector of natural numbers, or alternatively, when restricted to a finite input set of graphs. We further show that, when restricted to a finite input set of graphs and given an upper bound on the order of the graph $G$ as additional input, the problem cannot be $\mathsf{NP}$-hard unless $\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{NP}$. For this regime, we obtain partial positive results. We also investigate the problem's parameterised complexity and provide fpt-algorithms for the case that a single graph is given and that multiple graphs of the same order with subgraph instead of homomorphism counts are given.

The color refinement algorithm is mainly known as a heuristic method for graph isomorphism testing. It has surprising but natural characterizations in terms of, for example, homomorphism counts from trees and solutions to a system of linear equations. Grebík and Rocha (2022) have recently shown how color refinement and notions that characterize it generalize to graphons, which emerged as limit objects in the theory of dense graph limits. In particular, they show that these characterizations are still equivalent in the graphon case. The $k$-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm ($k$-WL) is a more powerful variant of color refinement that colors $k$-tuples instead of single vertices, where the terms $1$-WL and color refinement are often used interchangeably since they compute equivalent colorings. We show how to adapt the result of Grebík and Rocha to $k$-WL or, in other words, how $k$-WL and its characterizations generalize to graphons. In particular, we obtain characterizations in terms of homomorphism densities from multigraphs of bounded treewidth and linear equations. We give a simple example that parallel edges make a difference in the more general case of graphons, which means that, there, the equivalence between $1$-WL and color refinement does not hold anymore. We also show how this equivalence can be recovered by defining a variant of $k$-WL that corresponds to homomorphism densities from simple graphs of bounded treewidth.

We introduce the tree distance, a new distance measure on graphs. The tree distance can be computed in polynomial time with standard methods from convex optimization. It is based on the notion of fractional isomorphism, a characterization based on a natural system of linear equations whose integer solutions correspond to graph isomorphism. By results of Tinhofer (1986, 1991) and Dvořák (2010), two graphs G and H are fractionally isomorphic if and only if, for every tree T, the number of homomorphisms from T to G equals the corresponding number from T to H, which means that the tree distance of G and H is zero. Our main result is that this correspondence between the equivalence relations "fractional isomorphism" and "equal tree homomorphism densities" can be extended to a correspondence between the associated distance measures. Our result is inspired by a similar result due to Lovász and Szegedy (2006) and Borgs, Chayes, Lovász, Sós, and Vesztergombi (2008) that connects the cut distance of graphs to their homomorphism densities (over all graphs), which is a fundamental theorem in the theory of graph limits. We also introduce the path distance of graphs and take the corresponding result of Dell, Grohe, and Rattan (2018) for exact path homomorphism counts to an approximate level. Our results answer an open question of Grohe (2020). We establish our main results by generalizing our definitions to graphons as this allows us to apply techniques from functional analysis. We prove the fairly general statement that, for every "reasonably" defined graphon pseudometric, an exact correspondence to homomorphism densities can be turned into an approximate one. We also provide an example of a distance measure that violates this reasonableness condition. This incidentally answers an open question of Grebík and Rocha (2021).

Recent results show that the structural similarity of graphs can be characterized by counting homomorphisms to them: the Tree Theorem states that the well-known color-refinement algorithm does not distinguish two graphs G and H if and only if, for every tree T, the number of homomorphisms Hom(T,G) from T to G is equal to the corresponding number Hom(T,H) from T to H (Dell, Grohe, Rattan 2018). We show how this approach transfers to hypergraphs by introducing a generalization of color refinement. We prove that it does not distinguish two hypergraphs G and H if and only if, for every connected Berge-acyclic hypergraph B, we have Hom(B,G) = Hom(B,H). To this end, we show how homomorphisms of hypergraphs and of a colored variant of their incidence graphs are related to each other. This reduces the above statement to one about vertex-colored graphs.