arXiv++ Combinatorics

In a series of four papers we determine structures whose existence is dual, in the sense of complementary, to the existence of stars or combs. Here, in the third paper of the series, we present duality theorems for a combination of stars and combs: undominated combs. We describe their complementary structures in terms of rayless trees and of tree-decompositions. Applications include a complete characterisation, in terms of normal spanning trees, of the graphs whose rays are dominated but which have no rayless spanning tree. Only two such graphs had so far been constructed, by Seymour and Thomas and by Thomassen. As a corollary, we show that graphs with a normal spanning tree have a rayless spanning tree if and only if all their rays are dominated.

In a series of four papers we determine structures whose existence is dual, in the sense of complementary, to the existence of stars or combs. Here, in the second paper of the series, we present duality theorems for combinations of stars and combs: dominating stars and dominated combs. As dominating stars exist if and only if dominated combs do, the structures complementary to them coincide. Like for arbitrary stars and combs, our duality theorems for dominated combs (and dominating stars) are phrased in terms of normal trees or tree-decompositions. The complementary structures we provide for dominated combs unify those for stars and combs and allow us to derive our duality theorems for stars and combs from those for dominated combs. This is surprising given that our complementary structures for stars and combs are quite different: those for stars are locally finite whereas those for combs are rayless.

Extending the well-known star-comb lemma for infinite graphs, we characterise the graphs that do not contain an infinite comb or an infinite star, respectively, attached to a given set of vertices. We offer several characterisations: in terms of normal trees, tree-decompositions, ranks of rayless graphs and tangle-distinguishing separators.

Carmesin has extended Robertson and Seymour's tree-of-tangles theorem to the infinite tangles of locally finite infinite graphs. We extend it further to the infinite tangles of all infinite graphs. Our result has a number of applications for the topology of infinite graphs, such as their end spaces and their compactifications.

We show that every connected graph can be approximated by a normal tree, up to some arbitrarily small error phrased in terms of neighbourhoods around its ends. The existence of such approximate normal trees has consequences of both combinatorial and topological nature. On the combinatorial side, we show that a graph has a normal spanning tree as soon as it has normal spanning trees locally at each end; i.e., the only obstruction for a graph to having a normal spanning tree is an end for which none of its neighbourhoods has a normal spanning tree. On the topological side, we show that the end space $Ω(G)$, as well as the spaces $|G| = G \cup Ω(G)$ naturally associated with a graph $G$, are always paracompact. This gives unified and short proofs for a number of results by Diestel, Sprüssel and Polat, and answers an open question about metrizability of end spaces by Polat.

We construct a countable planar graph which, for any two vertices $u,v$ and any integer $k\ge 1$, contains $k$ edge-disjoint order-compatible $u$--$v$ paths but not infinitely many. This graph has applications in Ramsey theory, in the study of connectivity and in the characterisation of the Farey graph.

In finite graphs, finite-order tangles offer an abstract description of highly connected substructures. In infinite graphs, infinite-order tangles compactify the graphs in the same way the ends compactify connected locally finite graphs. Thus, the arising tangle compactification extends the well-known Freudenthal compactification from connected locally finite graphs to arbitrary infinite graphs. This Master's thesis investigates the tangle compactifcation.

We show that the tangle space of a graph, which compactifies it, is a quotient of its Stone-Čech remainder obtained by contracting the connected components.

We show that an arbitrary infinite graph $G$ can be compactified by its ends plus its critical vertex sets, where a finite set $X$ of vertices of an infinite graph is critical if its deletion leaves some infinitely many components each with neighbourhood precisely equal to $X$. We further provide a concrete separation system whose $\aleph_0$-tangles are precisely the ends plus critical vertex sets. Our tangle compactification $\vert G\vert_Γ$ is a quotient of Diestel's (denoted by $\vert G\vert_Θ$), and both use tangles to compactify a graph in much the same way as the ends of a locally finite and connected graph compactify it in its Freudenthal compactification. Finally, generalising both Diestel's construction of $\vert G\vert_Θ$ and our construction of $\vert G\vert_Γ$, we show that $G$ can be compactified by every inverse limit of compactifications of the sets of components obtained by deleting a finite set of vertices. Diestel's $\vert G\vert_Θ$ is the finest such compactification, and our $\vert G\vert_Γ$ is the coarsest one. Both coincide if and only if all tangles are ends. This answers two questions of Diestel.