arXiv++ Combinatorics

We prove that every graph admits a linked, componental, rooted tree-cut decomposition of finite adhesion that displays all undominated edge-ends. As a first application, we deduce that this tree-cut decomposition also displays the edge-degrees of all undominated edge-ends. For locally finite graphs $-$ where every end is an undominated edge-end $-$ this yields a linked tree-cut decomposition of finite adhesion into $\textit{finite}$ parts that displays all ends and their edge-degrees. As a second application, this latter tree-cut decomposition yields short, unified deductions of Thomassen's theorem on boundary-linked finite partitions, and of Bruhn and Stein's characterisation of Eulerian locally finite graphs in terms of even ends.

A graph is chordal if it contains no induced cycle of length four or more. While finite chordal graphs are precisely those admitting tree-decompositions into cliques, this fails for infinite graphs. We establish two results extending the known theory to the infinite setting. Our first result strengthens sufficient conditions of Halin, Kříž-Thomas, and Chudnovsky-Nguyen-Scott-Seymour: We show that every chordal graph without a strict comb of cliques admits a tree-decomposition into maximal cliques. Our second result characterises the chordal graphs admitting tree-decompositions into finite cliques: a connected graph admits such a decomposition if and only if it is chordal, admits a normal spanning tree, and does not contain $\mathcal{H}$ $\unicode{x2013}$ an infinite clique with two non-adjacent dominating vertices $\unicode{x2013}$ as an induced minor. Combined with the characterisation of graphs with normal spanning trees, this yields a description by three types of forbidden minors. Both proofs proceed via greedy constructions of length $ω$, with the key new ingredient for the second result being an Extension Lemma that uses a finiteness theorem of Halin on minimal separators to produce suitable finite clique extensions at each step.

Two $a{-}b$ paths in a graph $G$ are order-compatible if their common vertices occur in the same order when travelling from $a$ to $b$. Suppose a graph contains an infinite number $δ$ of edge-disjoint $a{-}b$ paths. G.A. Dirac asked whether there always exists a family of $δ$ edge-disjoint $a{-}b$ paths that are pairwise order-compatible. Confirming a conjecture by B. Zelinka, we show that this holds provided that the given $δ$ edge-disjoint $a{-}b$ paths have bounded length. Combining this with an earlier work of Zelinka, it follows that Dirac's question for an infinite cardinal $δ$ has an affirmative answer if and only if $δ$ has uncountable cofinality. As our second main result, we show that even when Dirac's question fails, it still holds that 'being connected by $δ$ edge-disjoint, pairwise order-compatible paths' is an equivalence relation for all values of $δ$. The most interesting case here is when $δ$ is countable.

We show that if a subset $Ψ$ of the ends of a graph $G$ can be displayed by a tree-decomposition of finite adhesion, then it can also be displayed by a linked such tree-decomposition. This tree-decomposition captures all combinatorial information of the ends in $Ψ$: their degrees, their sets of dominating vertices, and their combined degrees.

Halin conjectured that a graph has a normal spanning tree if and only if every minor of it has countable colouring number. This has recently been proven by the second author. In this paper, we strengthen this result by establishing the following local version of it: Given a prescribed set of vertices $U$ in a connected graph $G$, there is a normal tree in $G$ that includes $U$ if and only if every $U$-rooted minor of $G$ (i.e. a minor every branch set of which meets $U$) has countable colouring number. Our proof relies on a novel approach that combines normal partition trees as introduced by Brochet and Diestel with a suitable closure argument developed by Robertson, Seymour and Thomas in their discussion of infinite graphs of finite tree width.

We prove that the edge-end space of an infinite graph is metrizable if and only if it is first-countable. This strengthens a recent result by Aurichi, Magalhaes Jr.\ and Real (2024). Our central graph-theoretic tool is the use of tree-cut decompositions, introduced by Wollan (2015) as a variation of tree decompositions that is based on edge cuts instead of vertex separations. In particular, we give a new, elementary proof for Kurkofka's result (2022) that every infinite graph has a tree-cut decomposition of finite adhesion into its $ω$-edge blocks. Along the way, we also give a new, short proof for a classic result by Halin (1984) on $K_{k,κ}$-subdivisions in $k$-connected graphs, making this paper self-contained.

Every graph is majority 3-choosable. This generalises the result by Shelah-Milner that every graph has an unfriendly 3-partition, confirming a conjecture of Haslegrave from 2020.

In 1960, Nash-Williams proved his strong orientation theorem that every finite graph has an orientation in which the number of directed paths between any two vertices is at least half the number of undirected paths between them (rounded down). Nash-Williams conjectured that it is possible to find such orientations for infinite graphs as well. We provide a partial answer by proving that all rayless graphs have such an orientation.

We prove that every graph which admits a tree-decomposition into finite parts has a rooted tree-decomposition into finite parts that is linked, tight and componental. As an application, we obtain that every graph without half-grid minor has a lean tree-decomposition into finite parts, strengthening the corresponding result by Kriz and Thomas for graphs of finitely bounded tree-width. In particular, it follows that every graph without half-grid minor has a tree-decomposition which efficiently distinguishes all ends and critical vertex sets, strengthening results by Carmesin and by Elm and Kurkofka for this graph class. As a second application of our main result, it follows that every graph which admits a tree-decomposition into finite parts has a tree-decomposition into finite parts that displays all the ends of $G$ and their combined degrees, resolving a question of Halin from 1977. This latter tree-decomposition yields short, unified proofs of the characterisations due to Robertson, Seymour and Thomas of graphs without half-grid minor, and of graphs without binary tree subdivision.

Kriz and Thomas showed that every (finite or infinite) graph of tree-width $k \in \mathbb{N}$ admits a lean tree-decomposition of width $k$. We discuss a number of counterexamples demonstrating the limits of possible generalisations of their result to arbitrary infinite tree-width. In particular, we construct a locally finite, planar, connected graph that has no lean tree-decomposition.

We present an elementary construction of an uncountably chromatic graph without uncountable, infinitely connected subgraphs.

Nash-Williams proved in 1960 that a finite graph admits a $k$-arc-connected orientation if and only if it is $2k$-edge-connected, and conjectured that the same result should hold for all infinite graphs, too. Progress on Nash-Williams's problem was made by C. Thomassen, who proved in 2016 that all $8k$-edge-connected infinite graphs admit a $k$-arc connected orientation, and by the first author, who recently showed that edge-connectivity of $4k$ suffices for locally-finite, 1-ended graphs. In the present article, we establish the optimal bound $2k$ in Nash-Williams's conjecture for all locally finite graphs with countably many ends.

Two graphs are of the same topological type if they can be mutually embedded into each other topologically. We show that there are exactly $\aleph_1$ distinct topological types of countable trees. In general, for any infinite cardinal $κ$ there are exactly $κ^+$ distinct topological types of trees of size $κ$. This solves a problem of van der Holst from 2005.

We investigate path-, ray- and branch spaces of trees, certain topological spaces naturally associated with order theoretic trees, and provide topological characterisations for these spaces in terms of the existence of certain kinds of (sub-)bases. Our results yield a solution to a problem due to Diestel from 1992, by establishing the following equivalences for any Hausdorff space $X$: (1) $X$ is homeomorphic to the end space of a graph, (2) $X$ is homeomorphic to the ray space of a special order tree, (3) $X$ admits a nested clopen subbase that is noetherian, hereditarily complete and $σ$-disjoint.

We construct a locally finite connected graph whose Freudenthal compactification is universal for the class of completely regular continua, a class also known in the literature under the name thin or graph-like continua.

We present a systematic investigation into how tree-decompositions of finite adhesion capture topological properties of the space formed by a graph together with its ends. As main results, we characterise when the ends of a graph can be distinguished, and characterise which subsets of ends can be displayed by a tree-decomposition of finite adhesion. In particular, we show that a subset $Ψ$ of the ends of a graph $G$ can be displayed by a tree-decomposition of finite adhesion if and only if $Ψ$ is $G_δ$ (a countable intersection of open sets) in $|G|$, the topological space formed by a graph together with its ends. Since the undominated ends of a graph are easily seen to be $G_δ$, this provides a structural explanation for Carmesin's result that the set of undominated ends can always be displayed.

We investigate Maker-Breaker games on graphs of size $\aleph_1$ in which Maker's goal is to build a copy of the host graph. We establish a firm dependence of the outcome of the game on the axiomatic framework. Relating to this, we prove that there is a winning strategy for Maker in the $K_{ω,ω_1}$-game under ZFC+MA+$\neg$CH and a winning strategy for Breaker under ZFC+CH. We prove a similar result for the $K_{ω_1}$-game. Here, Maker has a winning strategy under ZF+DC+AD, while Breaker has one under ZFC+CH again.

We give a short, topological proof that all graphs admit tree-decompositions displaying their topological ends.

End-spaces of infinite graphs naturally generalise the Freudenthal boundary and sit at the interface between graph theory, geometric group theory and topology. Our main result is that every end-space can topologically be represented by a special order tree. Our main proof ingredient is a structure theorem that we introduce, which carves out the order-tree-like structure of any graph in such a way that there is a natural bijection between the ends of the graph and the limit-type down-closed chains of the order-tree.

We show that for every infinite collection $\mathcal{R}$ of disjoint equivalent rays in a graph $G$ there is a subdivision of the hexagonal half-grid in $G$ such that all its vertical rays belong to $\mathcal{R}$. This result strengthens Halin's grid theorem by giving control over which specific set of rays is used, while its proof is significantly shorter.