arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph $G$ is said to be ubiquitous, if every graph $Γ$ that contains arbitrarily many disjoint $G$-minors automatically contains infinitely many disjoint $G$-minors. The well-known Ubiquity conjecture of Andreae says that every locally finite graph is ubiquitous. In this paper we show that locally finite graphs admitting a certain type of tree-decomposition, which we call an extensive tree-decomposition, are ubiquitous. In particular this includes all locally finite graphs of finite tree-width, and also all locally finite graphs with finitely many ends, all of which have finite degree. It remains an open question whether every locally finite graph admits an extensive tree-decomposition.

Building on recent work by Thomassen, we show that Nash-Williams' orientation theorem, that every finite $2k$-edge-connected multigraph has a $k$-arc-connected orientation, also holds for all infinite multigraphs.

An end of a graph $G$ is an equivalence class of rays, where two rays are equivalent if there are infinitely many vertex-disjoint paths between them in $G$. The degree of an end is the maximum cardinality of a collection of pairwise disjoint rays in this equivalence class. Halin conjectured that the end degree can be characterised in terms of certain typical ray configurations, which would generalise his famous \emph{grid theorem}. In particular, every end of regular uncountable degree $κ$ would contain a \emph{star of rays}, i.e.\ a configuration consisting of a central ray $R$ and $κ$ neighbouring rays $(R_i \colon i < κ)$ all disjoint from each other and each $R_i$ sending a family of infinitely many disjoint paths to $R$ so that paths from distinct families only meet in $R$. We show that Halin's conjecture fails for end degree $ \aleph_1$, holds for $\aleph_2,\aleph_3,\ldots,\aleph_ω$, fails for $ \aleph_{ω+1}$, and is undecidable (in ZFC) for the next $\aleph_{ω+n}$ with $n \in \mathbb{N}$, $n \geq 2$. Further results include a complete solution for all cardinals under GCH, complemented by a number of consistency results.

We present two short proofs for Diestel's criterion that a connected graph has a normal spanning tree provided it contains no subdivision of a countable clique in which every edge has been replaced by uncountably many parallel edges.

A simplified construction is presented for Komjáth's result that for every uncountable cardinal $κ$, there are $2^κ$ graphs of size $κ$ none of them being a minor of another.

Halin conjectured 20 years ago that a graph has a normal spanning tree if and only if every minor of it has countable colouring number. We prove Halin's conjecture. This implies a forbidden minor characterisation for the property of having a normal spanning tree.

In a paper from 2001 (Journal of the LMS), Diestel and Leader offered a proof that a connected graph has a normal spanning tree if and only if it does not contain a minor from two specific forbidden classes of graphs, all of cardinality $\aleph_1$. Unfortunately, their proof contains a gap, and their result is incorrect. In this paper, we construct a third type of obstruction: an $\aleph_1$-sized graph without a normal spanning tree that contains neither of the two types described by Diestel and Leader as a minor. Further, we show that any list of forbidden minors characterising the graphs with normal spanning trees must contain graphs of arbitrarily large cardinality.

We show that a graph $G$ has a normal spanning tree if and only if its vertex set is the union of countably many sets each separated from any subdivided infinite clique in $G$ by a finite set of vertices. This proves a conjecture by Brochet and Diestel from 1994, giving a common strengthening of two classical normal spanning tree criterions due to Jung and Halin. Moreover, our method gives a new, algorithmic proof of Halin's theorem that every connected graph not containing a subdivision of a countable clique has a normal spanning tree.

We show that every connected graph can be approximated by a normal tree, up to some arbitrarily small error phrased in terms of neighbourhoods around its ends. The existence of such approximate normal trees has consequences of both combinatorial and topological nature. On the combinatorial side, we show that a graph has a normal spanning tree as soon as it has normal spanning trees locally at each end; i.e., the only obstruction for a graph to having a normal spanning tree is an end for which none of its neighbourhoods has a normal spanning tree. On the topological side, we show that the end space $Ω(G)$, as well as the spaces $|G| = G \cup Ω(G)$ naturally associated with a graph $G$, are always paracompact. This gives unified and short proofs for a number of results by Diestel, Sprüssel and Polat, and answers an open question about metrizability of end spaces by Polat.

It is known that the cop number $c(G)$ of a connected graph $G$ can be bounded as a function of the genus of the graph $g(G)$. The best known bound, that $c(G) \leq \left\lfloor \frac{3 g(G)}{2}\right\rfloor + 3$, was given by Schröder, who conjectured that in fact $c(G) \leq g(G) + 3$. We give the first improvement to Schröder's bound, showing that $c(G) \leq \frac{4g(G)}{3} + \frac{10}{3}$.

Let ${\mathcal{M} = (M_i \colon i\in K)}$ be a finite or infinite family consisting of matroids on a common ground set $E$ each of which may be finitary or cofinitary. We prove the following Cantor-Bernstein-type result: If there is a collection of bases, one for each $M_i$, which covers the set $E$, and also a collection of bases which is pairwise disjoint, then there is a collection of bases which partitions $E$. We also show that the failure of this Cantor-Bernstein-type statement for arbitrary matroid families is consistent relative to the axioms of set theory ZFC.

We show that if a graph admits a packing and a covering both consisting of $λ$ many spanning trees, where $λ$ is some infinite cardinal, then the graph also admits a decomposition into $λ$ many spanning trees. For finite $λ$ the analogous question remains open, however, a slightly weaker statement is proved.

We develop a unified theory of Eulerian spaces by combining the combinatorial theory of infinite, locally finite Eulerian graphs as introduced by Diestel and Kühn with the topological theory of Eulerian continua defined as irreducible images of the circle, as proposed by Bula, Nikiel and Tymchatyn. First, we clarify the notion of an Eulerian space and establish that all competing definitions in the literature are in fact equivalent. Next, responding to an unsolved problem of Treybig and Ward from 1981, we formulate a combinatorial conjecture for characterising the Eulerian spaces, in a manner that naturally extends the characterisation for finite Eulerian graphs. Finally, we present far-reaching results in support of our conjecture which together subsume and extend all known results about the Eulerianity of infinite graphs and continua to date. In particular, we characterise all one-dimensional Eulerian spaces.

We prove that a connected graph contains a circuit---a closed walk that repeats no edges---through any $k$ prescribed edges if and only if it contains no odd cut of size at most $k$.

A graph $G$ is said to be $\preceq$-ubiquitous, where $\preceq$ is the minor relation between graphs, if whenever $Γ$ is a graph with $nG \preceq Γ$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$, then one also has $\aleph_0 G \preceq Γ$, where $αG$ is the disjoint union of $α$ many copies of $G$. A well-known conjecture of Andreae is that every locally finite connected graph is $\preceq$-ubiquitous. In this paper we give a sufficient condition on the structure of the ends of a graph~$G$ which implies that $G$ is $\preceq$-ubiquitous. In particular this implies that the full grid is $\preceq$-ubiquitous.

In 1978, Richard Rado showed that every edge-coloured complete graph of countably infinite order can be partitioned into monochromatic paths of different colours. He asked whether this remains true for uncountable complete graphs and a notion of \emph{generalised paths}. In 2016, Daniel Soukup answered this in the affirmative and conjectured that a similar result should hold for complete bipartite graphs with bipartition classes of the same infinite cardinality, namely that every such graph edge-coloured with $r$ colours can be partitioned into $2r-1$ monochromatic generalised paths with each colour being used at most twice. In the present paper, we give an affirmative answer to Soukup's conjecture.

A space $X$ is $n$-arc connected (respectively, $n$-circle connected) if for any choice of at most $n$ points there is an arc (respectively, a circle) in $X$ containing the specified points. We study $n$-arc connectedness and $n$-circle connectedness in compactifications of locally finite graphs and the slightly more general class of graph-like continua, uncovering a striking difference in their behaviour regarding $n$-arc and -circle connectedness.

Let $\triangleleft$ be a relation between graphs. We say a graph $G$ is \emph{$\triangleleft$-ubiquitous} if whenever $Γ$ is a graph with $nG \triangleleft Γ$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$, then one also has $\aleph_0 G \triangleleft Γ$, where $αG$ is the disjoint union of $α$ many copies of $G$. The \emph{Ubiquity Conjecture} of Andreae, a well-known open problem in the theory of infinite graphs, asserts that every locally finite connected graph is ubiquitous with respect to the minor relation. In this paper, which is the first of a series of papers making progress towards the Ubiquity Conjecture, we show that all trees are ubiquitous with respect to the topological minor relation, irrespective of their cardinality. This answers a question of Andreae from 1979.

We show that the tangle space of a graph, which compactifies it, is a quotient of its Stone-Čech remainder obtained by contracting the connected components.

Let $K_{\mathbb{N}}$ be the complete symmetric digraph on the positive integers. Answering a question of DeBiasio and McKenney, we construct a $2$-colouring of the edges of $K_{\mathbb{N}}$ in which every monochromatic path has density~$0$. However, if we restrict the length of monochromatic paths in one colour, then no example as above can exist: We show that every $(r+1)$-edge-coloured complete symmetric digraph (of arbitrary infinite cardinality) containing no directed paths of edge-length $\ell_i$ for any colour $i\leq r$ can be covered by $\prod_{i\leq r} \ell_i$ pairwise disjoint monochromatic complete symmetric digraphs in colour $r+1$. Furthermore, we present a stability version for the countable case of the latter result: We prove that the edge-colouring is uniquely determined on a large subgraph, as soon as the upper density of monochromatic paths in colour $r+1$ is bounded by $\prod_{i\in [r]}\frac{1}{\ell_i}$.