arXiv++ Combinatorics

Every countable graph can be built from finite graphs by a suitable infinite process, either adding new vertices randomly or imposing some rules on the new edges. On the other hand, a profinite topological graph is built as the inverse limit of finite graphs with graph epimorphisms. We propose to look at both constructions simultaneously. We consider countable graphs that can be built from finite ones by using both embeddings and projections, possibly adding a single vertex at each step. We show that the Rado graph can be built this way, while Henson's universal triangle-free graph cannot. We also study the corresponding profinite graphs. Finally, we present a concrete model of the projectively universal profinite graph, the projective Fraisse limit of finite graphs, showing in particular that it has a dense subset of isolated vertices.

In this work, we continue the tradition initiated by Geschke, 2011 of viewing the uncountable Borel chromatic number of analytic graphs as cardinal invariants of the continuum. We show that various uncountable Borel chromatic numbers of closed graphs can be consistently different, as well as consistently equal to the continuum. This is done using arguments that are typical to Axiom A forcing notions.

An end of a graph $G$ is an equivalence class of rays, where two rays are equivalent if there are infinitely many vertex-disjoint paths between them in $G$. The degree of an end is the maximum cardinality of a collection of pairwise disjoint rays in this equivalence class. Halin conjectured that the end degree can be characterised in terms of certain typical ray configurations, which would generalise his famous \emph{grid theorem}. In particular, every end of regular uncountable degree $κ$ would contain a \emph{star of rays}, i.e.\ a configuration consisting of a central ray $R$ and $κ$ neighbouring rays $(R_i \colon i < κ)$ all disjoint from each other and each $R_i$ sending a family of infinitely many disjoint paths to $R$ so that paths from distinct families only meet in $R$. We show that Halin's conjecture fails for end degree $ \aleph_1$, holds for $\aleph_2,\aleph_3,\ldots,\aleph_ω$, fails for $ \aleph_{ω+1}$, and is undecidable (in ZFC) for the next $\aleph_{ω+n}$ with $n \in \mathbb{N}$, $n \geq 2$. Further results include a complete solution for all cardinals under GCH, complemented by a number of consistency results.

Diestel and Leader have characterised connected graphs that admit a normal spanning tree via two classes of forbidden minors. One class are Halin's $(\aleph_0,\aleph_1)$-graphs: bipartite graphs with bipartition $(\mathbb{N},B)$ such that $B$ is uncountable and every vertex of $B$ has infinite degree. Our main result is that under Martin's Axiom and the failure of the Continuum Hypothesis, the class of forbidden $(\aleph_0,\aleph_1)$-graphs in Diestel and Leader's result can be replaced by one single instance of such a graph. Under CH, however, the class of $(\aleph_0,\aleph_1)$-graphs contains minor-incomparable elements, namely graphs of binary type, and $\mathcal{U}$-indivisible graphs. Assuming CH, Diestel and Leader asked whether every $(\aleph_0,\aleph_1)$-graph has an $(\aleph_0,\aleph_1)$-minor that is either indivisible or of binary type, and whether any two $\mathcal{U}$-indivisible graphs are necessarily minors of each other. For both questions, we construct examples showing that the answer is in the negative.