arXiv++ Combinatorics

Every countable graph can be built from finite graphs by a suitable infinite process, either adding new vertices randomly or imposing some rules on the new edges. On the other hand, a profinite topological graph is built as the inverse limit of finite graphs with graph epimorphisms. We propose to look at both constructions simultaneously. We consider countable graphs that can be built from finite ones by using both embeddings and projections, possibly adding a single vertex at each step. We show that the Rado graph can be built this way, while Henson's universal triangle-free graph cannot. We also study the corresponding profinite graphs. Finally, we present a concrete model of the projectively universal profinite graph, the projective Fraisse limit of finite graphs, showing in particular that it has a dense subset of isolated vertices.

Geschke proved that there is clopen graph on $2^ω$ which is 3-saturated, but the clopen graphs on $2^ω$ do not even have infinite subgraphs that are 4-saturated; however there is $F_σ$ graph that is $ω_1$-saturated. It turns out that there is no closed graph on $2^ω$ which is $ω$-saturated. In this note we complete this picture by proving that for every $n$ there is an $n$-saturated closed graph on the Cantor space $2^ω$. The key lemma is based on probabilistic argument. The final construction is an inverse limit of finite graphs.

A countable poset is ultrahomogeneous if every isomorphism between its finite subposets can be extended to an automorphism. The groups $\operatorname{Aut}(A)$ of such posets $A$ have a natural topology in which $\operatorname{Aut}(A)$ are Polish topological groups. We consider the problem whether $\operatorname{Aut}(A)$ contains a dense free subgroup of two generators. We show that if $A$ is ultrahomogeneous, then $\operatorname{Aut}(A)$ contains such subgroup. Moreover, we characterize whose countable ultrahomogeneous posets $A$ such that for each natural $m$, the set of all cyclically dense elements $\bar{g}\in\operatorname{Aut}(A)^m$ for the diagonal action is comeager in $\operatorname{Aut}(A)^m$. In our considerations we strongly use the result of Schmerl which says that there are essentially four types of countably infinite ultrahomogeneous posets.