Papers by Pascal Gollin
4 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Base partition for mixed families of finitary and cofinitary matroids
Published in Combinatorica Volume 41 (2021): Pages 31-52
• View Publication
• BIB
Let ${\mathcal{M} = (M_i \colon i\in K)}$ be a finite or infinite family consisting of matroids on a common ground set $E$ each of which may be finitary or cofinitary. We prove the following Cantor-Bernstein-type result: If there is a collection of bases, one for each $M_i$, which covers the set $E$, and also a collection of bases which is pairwise disjoint, then there is a collection of bases which partitions $E$. We also show that the failure of this Cantor-Bernstein-type statement for arbitrary matroid families is consistent relative to the axioms of set theory ZFC.
A Cantor-Bernstein-type theorem for spanning trees in infinite graphs
Published in Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B Volume 149 (July 2021): Pages 16-22
• View Publication
• BIB
We show that if a graph admits a packing and a covering both consisting of $λ$ many spanning trees, where $λ$ is some infinite cardinal, then the graph also admits a decomposition into $λ$ many spanning trees. For finite $λ$ the analogous question remains open, however, a slightly weaker statement is proved.
Ubiquity in graphs I: Topological ubiquity of trees
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $\triangleleft$ be a relation between graphs. We say a graph $G$ is \emph{$\triangleleft$-ubiquitous} if whenever $Γ$ is a graph with $nG \triangleleft Γ$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$, then one also has $\aleph_0 G \triangleleft Γ$, where $αG$ is the disjoint union of $α$ many copies of $G$.
The \emph{Ubiquity Conjecture} of Andreae, a well-known open problem in the theory of infinite graphs, asserts that every locally finite connected graph is ubiquitous with respect to the minor relation.
In this paper, which is the first of a series of papers making progress towards the Ubiquity Conjecture, we show that all trees are ubiquitous with respect to the topological minor relation, irrespective of their cardinality. This answers a question of Andreae from 1979.
Canonical tree-decompositions of a graph that display its $k$-blocks
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A $k$-block in a graph $G$ is a maximal set of at least $k$ vertices no two of which can be separated in $G$ by removing less than $k$ vertices. It is separable if there exists a tree-decomposition of adhesion less than $k$ of $G$ in which this $k$-block appears as a part.
Carmesin, Diestel, Hamann, Hundertmark and Stein proved that every finite graph has a canonical tree-decomposition of adhesion less than $k$ that distinguishes all its $k$-blocks and tangles of order $k$. We construct such tree-decompositions with the additional property that every separable $k$-block is equal to the unique part in which it is contained. This proves a conjecture of Diestel.