arXiv++ Combinatorics

In 1980, Thomassen stated his Weak Linkage conjecture: for odd positive integers $k$, if a graph $G$ is $k$-edge-connected, then, for any collection of $k$ pairs of vertices $\{s_1,t_1\}$, ..., $\{s_k,t_k\}$ in $G$, not necessarily distinct, there are pairwise edge-disjoint paths $P_1,...,P_k$ in $G$, with $P_i$ joining $s_i$ and $t_i$. In 1991, Huck proved that the conclusion holds if $G$ is finite and $(k+1)$-edge-connected. We prove that Huck's theorem holds also for all infinite graphs, extending and improving a result of Ok, Richter and Thomassen for 1-ended, locally finite graphs. A novel key tool in the proof is the Linking Fan Proposition proved in Section 3. To show the potential and usefulness of this proposition in other contexts, we present in the last section a new result, similar to a result of Thomassen, on the existence of $2k$-edge-connected finite immersions in $(2k+2)$-edge-connected infinite graphs, and as a corollary we also reprove a statement on $k$-arc-connected orientations.

Nash-Williams proved in 1960 that a finite graph admits a $k$-arc-connected orientation if and only if it is $2k$-edge-connected, and conjectured that the same result should hold for all infinite graphs, too. Progress on Nash-Williams's problem was made by C. Thomassen, who proved in 2016 that all $8k$-edge-connected infinite graphs admit a $k$-arc connected orientation, and by the first author, who recently showed that edge-connectivity of $4k$ suffices for locally-finite, 1-ended graphs. In the present article, we establish the optimal bound $2k$ in Nash-Williams's conjecture for all locally finite graphs with countably many ends.

In 1960 Nash-Williams proved that an edge-connectivity of 2k is sufficient for a finite graph to have a k-arc-connected orientation. He then conjectured that the same is true for infinite graphs. In 2016, Thomassen, using his own results on the auxiliary lifting graph, proved that 8k-edge-connected infinite graphs admit a $k$-arc connected orientation. Here we improve this result for the class of $1$-ended locally-finite graphs and show that an edge-connectivity of 4k is enough in that case. Crucial to this improvement are results presented in a separate paper, by the same author of this paper, on the key concept of the lifting graph, extending results by Ok, Richter, and Thomassen.

The `lifting` or `splitting-off` operation on graphs is performed by deleting two edges sv and sw having a common end s and adding a new edge between v and w. Such a lift is considered good if it preserves a certain local edge-connectivity between the pairs of vertices different from the vertex s at which lifting takes place. The operation is important for inductive proofs concerning edge-connectivity, and can be seen widely applied in the literature on connectivity augmentation, network design, orientation (of finite and infinite graphs), and edge-disjoint linkage. It was studied by Lovasz, who used the term splitting-off, and Mader, who used the term lifting. They proved the first two significant results on it, in 1976 and 1978 respectively, showing the existence of a good lift under certain conditions. Then it was used and studied by other researchers, through the 1980s, both for undirected and directed graphs. In particular, it was investigated further by Frank who proved in 1992 that there are floor of deg(s)/2 disjoint good lifts. Motivated by the applications, a new method for studying the operation was introduced by Jordan in the late 1990s. He defined and studied the structure of the `non-admissibility` graph, which is the complement of the lifting graph; the subject of this paper. He proved a number of significant structural results on it, which he applied to connectivity augmentation. Independently, in 2016, Thomassen defined the `lifting graph`, and called its complement the `bad graph`, to apply it in finding orientations of infinite graphs. Later in the same year, Thomassen with Ok and Richter extended the study, and applied their results to linkages in infinite graphs. Here we give a more comprehensive analysis of the structure of the lifting graph.