arXiv++ Combinatorics

In 1980, Thomassen stated his Weak Linkage conjecture: for odd positive integers $k$, if a graph $G$ is $k$-edge-connected, then, for any collection of $k$ pairs of vertices $\{s_1,t_1\}$, ..., $\{s_k,t_k\}$ in $G$, not necessarily distinct, there are pairwise edge-disjoint paths $P_1,...,P_k$ in $G$, with $P_i$ joining $s_i$ and $t_i$. In 1991, Huck proved that the conclusion holds if $G$ is finite and $(k+1)$-edge-connected. We prove that Huck's theorem holds also for all infinite graphs, extending and improving a result of Ok, Richter and Thomassen for 1-ended, locally finite graphs. A novel key tool in the proof is the Linking Fan Proposition proved in Section 3. To show the potential and usefulness of this proposition in other contexts, we present in the last section a new result, similar to a result of Thomassen, on the existence of $2k$-edge-connected finite immersions in $(2k+2)$-edge-connected infinite graphs, and as a corollary we also reprove a statement on $k$-arc-connected orientations.

In 1972, Tutte posed the $3$-Flow Conjecture: that all $4$-edge-connected graphs have a nowhere zero $3$-flow. This was extended by Jaeger et al.(1992) to allow vertices to have a prescribed, possibly non-zero difference (modulo $3$) between the inflow and outflow. They conjectured that all $5$-edge-connected graphs with a valid prescription function have a nowhere zero $3$-flow meeting that prescription. Kochol (2001) showed that replacing $4$-edge-connected with $5$-edge-connected would suffice to prove the $3$-Flow Conjecture and Lovász et al.(2013) showed that both conjectures hold if the edge connectivity condition is relaxed to $6$-edge-connected. Both problems are still open for $5$-edge-connected graphs. The $3$-Flow Conjecture was known to hold for planar graphs, as it is the dual of Grötzsch's Colouring Theorem. Steinberg and Younger (1989) provided the first direct proof using flows for planar graphs, as well as a proof for projective planar graphs. Richter et al.(2016) provided the first direct proof using flows of the Strong $3$-Flow Conjecture for planar graphs. We prove the Strong $3$-Flow Conjecture for projective planar graphs.

In studying properties of simple drawings of the complete graph in the sphere, two natural questions arose for us: can an edge have multiple segments on the boundary of the same face? and is each face the intersection of sides of 3-cycles? The second is asserted to be obvious in two previously published articles, but when asked, authors of both papers were unable to provide a proof. We present a proof. The first is quite easily proved and the technique yields a third, even simpler, fact: no three edges at a vertex all have internal points incident with the same face.

Hill's Conjecture states that the crossing number $\text{cr}(K_n)$ of the complete graph $K_n$ in the plane (equivalently, the sphere) is $\frac{1}{4}\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor\lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor\lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor\lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor=n^4/64 + O(n^3)$. Moon proved that the expected number of crossings in a spherical drawing in which the points are randomly distributed and joined by geodesics is precisely $n^4/64+O(n^3)$, thus matching asymptotically the conjectured value of $\text{cr}(K_n)$. Let $\text{cr}_P(G)$ denote the crossing number of a graph $G$ in the projective plane. Recently, Elkies proved that the expected number of crossings in a naturally defined random projective plane drawing of $K_n$ is $(n^4/8π^2)+O(n^3)$. In analogy with the relation of Moon's result to Hill's conjecture, Elkies asked if $\lim_{n\to\infty} \text{cr}_P(K_n)/n^4=1/8π^2$. We construct drawings of $K_n$ in the projective plane that disprove this.

Motivated by the successful application of geometry to proving the Harary-Hill Conjecture for "pseudolinear" drawings of $K_n$, we introduce "pseudospherical" drawings of graphs. A spherical drawing of a graph $G$ is a drawing in the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^2$ in which the vertices of $G$ are represented as points -- no three on a great circle -- and the edges of $G$ are shortest-arcs in $\mathbb{S}^2$ connecting pairs of vertices. Such a drawing has three properties: (1) every edge $e$ is contained in a simple closed curve $γ_e$ such that the only vertices in $γ_e$ are the ends of $e$; (2) if $e\ne f$, then $γ_e\capγ_f$ has precisely two crossings; and (3) if $e\ne f$, then $e$ intersects $γ_f$ at most once, either in a crossing or an end of $e$. We use Properties (1)--(3) to define a pseudospherical drawing of $G$. Our main result is that, for the complete graph, Properties (1)--(3) are equivalent to the same three properties but with "precisely two crossings" in (2) replaced by "at most two crossings". The proof requires a result in the geometric transversal theory of arrangements of pseudocircles. This is proved using the surprising result that the absence of special arcs ( coherent spirals) in an arrangement of simple closed curves characterizes the fact that any two curves in the arrangement have at most two crossings. Our studies provide the necessary ideas for exhibiting a drawing of $K_{10}$ that has no extension to an arrangement of pseudocircles and a drawing of $K_9$ that does extend to an arrangement of pseudocircles, but no such extension has all pairs of pseudocircles crossing twice.

For each positive integer $m$, Pach, Solymosi, and Tóth identified two canonical complete topological subgraphs $C_m$ and $T_m$, and proved that every sufficiently large topological complete graph contains $C_m$ or $T_m$ as a subgraph. We generalize this result in the setting of abstract rotation systems.

The crossing number of a graph $G$ is the least number of crossings over all possible drawings of $G$. We present a structural characterization of graphs with crossing number one.

The number $Z(n):=\lfloor n/2\rfloor\lfloor (n-1)/2\rfloor$ is the smallest number of crossings in a simple planar drawing of $K_{2,n}$ in which both vertices on the 2-side have the same clockwise rotation. For two vertices $u,v$ on the $q$-side of a simple drawing of $K_{p,q}$, let $\operatorname{cr}_D(u,v)$ denote the total number of crossings that edges incident with $u$ have with edges incident with $v$. We show that in any simple drawing $D$ of $K_{p,q}$ in a surface $Σ$ the number of pairs of vertices on the $q$-side of $K_{p,q}$ having $\operatorname{cr}_D(u,v)<Z(p)$ is bounded as a function of $p$ and $Σ$. As a consequence, we also show that, for a fixed integer $p$ and surface $Σ$, there exists a finite set of drawings $\mathcal{D}(p,Σ)$ of complete bipartite graphs such that, for each $q$, a crossing-minimal drawing of $K_{p,q}$ can be obtained by "duplicating vertices" in some drawing from $\mathcal D(p,Σ)$.

A pseudoline is a homeomorphic image of the real line in the plane so that its complement is disconnected. An arrangement of pseudolines is a set of pseudolines in which every two cross exactly once. A drawing of a graph is pseudolinear if the edges can be extended to an arrangement of pseudolines. In the recent study of crossing numbers, pseudolinear drawings have played an important role as they are a natural combinatorial extension of rectilinear drawings. A characterization of the pseudolinear drawings of $K_n$ was found recently. We extend this characterization to all graphs, by describing the set of minimal forbidden subdrawings for pseudolinear drawings. Our characterization also leads to a polynomial-time algorithm to recognize pseudolinear drawings and construct the pseudolines when it is possible.

In this work, we introduce and develop a theory of convex drawings of the complete graph $K_n$ in the sphere. A drawing $D$ of $K_n$ is convex if, for every 3-cycle $T$ of $K_n$, there is a closed disc $Δ_T$ bounded by $D[T]$ such that, for any two vertices $u,v$ with $D[u]$ and $D[v]$ both in $Δ_T$, the entire edge $D[uv]$ is also contained in $Δ_T$. As one application of this perspective, we consider drawings containing a non-convex $K_5$ that has restrictions on its extensions to drawings of $K_7$. For each such drawing, we use convexity to produce a new drawing with fewer crossings. This is the first example of local considerations providing sufficient conditions for suboptimality. In particular, we do not compare the number of crossings {with the number of crossings in} any known drawings. This result sheds light on Aichholzer's computer proof (personal communication) showing that, for $n\le 12$, every optimal drawing of $K_n$ is convex. Convex drawings are characterized by excluding two of the five drawings of $K_5$. Two refinements of convex drawings are h-convex and f-convex drawings. The latter have been shown by Aichholzer et al (Deciding monotonicity of good drawings of the complete graph, Proc.~XVI Spanish Meeting on Computational Geometry (EGC 2015), 2015) and, independently, the authors of the current article (Levi's Lemma, pseudolinear drawings of $K_n$, and empty triangles, \rbr{J. Graph Theory DOI: 10.1002/jgt.22167)}, to be equivalent to pseudolinear drawings. Also, h-convex drawings are equivalent to pseudospherical drawings as demonstrated recently by Arroyo et al (Extending drawings of complete graphs into arrangements of pseudocircles, submitted).

A {\em good drawing\/} of $K_n$ is a drawing of the complete graph with $n$ vertices in the sphere such that: no two edges with a common end cross; no two edges cross more than once; and no three edges all cross at the same point. Gioan's Theorem asserts that any two good drawings of $K_n$ that have the same rotations of incident edges at every vertex are equivalent up to Reidemeister moves. At the time of preparation, 10 years had passed between the statement in the WG 2005 conference proceedings and our interest in the proposition. Shortly after we completed our preprint, Gioan independently completed a preprint.

The Harary--Hill conjecture, still open after more than 50 years, asserts that the crossing number of the complete graph $K_n$ is $ H(n) = \frac 1 4 \left\lfloor\frac{\mathstrut n}{\mathstrut 2}\right\rfloor \left\lfloor\frac{\mathstrut n-1}{\mathstrut 2}\right\rfloor \left\lfloor\frac{\mathstrut n-2}{\mathstrut 2}\right\rfloor \left\lfloor\frac{\mathstrut n-3}{\mathstrut 2}\right \rfloor$. Ábrego et al. introduced the notion of shellability of a drawing $D$ of $K_n$. They proved that if $D$ is $s$-shellable for some $s\geq\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor$, then $D$ has at least $H(n)$ crossings. This is the first combinatorial condition on a drawing that guarantees at least $H(n)$ crossings. In this work, we generalize the concept of $s$-shellability to bishellability, where the former implies the latter in the sense that every $s$-shellable drawing is, for any $b \leq s-2$, also $b$-bishellable. Our main result is that $(\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor\!-\!2)$-bishellability of a drawing $D$ of $K_n$ also guarantees, with a simpler proof than for $s$-shellability, that $D$ has at least $H(n)$ crossings. We exhibit a drawing of $K_{11}$ that has $H(11)$ crossings, is 3-bishellable, and is not $s$-shellable for any $s\geq5$. This shows that we have properly extended the class of drawings for which the Harary-Hill Conjecture is proved. Moreover, we provide an infinite family of drawings of $K_n$ that are $(\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor\!-\!2)$-bishellable, but not $s$-shellable for any $s\geq\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor$.

It is very well-known that there are precisely two minimal non-planar graphs: $K_5$ and $K_{3,3}$ (degree 2 vertices being irrelevant in this context). In the language of crossing numbers, these are the only 1-crossing-critical graphs: they each have crossing number at least one, and every proper subgraph has crossing number less than one. In 1987, Kochol exhibited an infinite family of 3-connected, simple 2-crossing-critical graphs. In this work, we: (i) determine all the 3-connected 2-crossing-critical graphs that contain a subdivision of the Möbius Ladder $V_{10}$; (ii) show how to obtain all the not 3-connected 2-crossing-critical graphs from the 3-connected ones; (iii) show that there are only finitely many 3-connected 2-crossing-critical graphs not containing a subdivision of $V_{10}$; and (iv) determine all the 3-connected 2-crossing-critical graphs that do not contain a subdivision of $V_{8}$.

Since the crossing number of K_{12} is now known to be 150, it is well-known that simple counting arguments and Kleitman's parity theorem for the crossing number of K_{2n+1} combine with a specific drawing of K_{13} to show that the crossing number of K_{13} is one of the numbers in {217,219,221,223,225}. We show that the crossing number is not 217.

Let $Σ$ be a surface with boundary $b(Σ)$, $\mathcal{L}$ be a collection of $k$ disjoint $b(Σ)$-paths in $Σ$, and $P$ be a non-separating $b(Σ)$-path in $Σ$. We prove that there is a homeomorphism $φ: Σ\to Σ$ that fixes each point of $b(Σ)$ and such that $φ(\mathcal{L})$ meets $P$ at most $2k$ times. With this theorem, we derive explicit constants in the graph minor algorithms of Robertson and Seymour. We reprove a result concerning redundant vertices for graphs on surfaces, but with explicit bounds. That is, we prove that there exists a computable integer $t:=t(Σ,k)$ such that if $v$ is a '$t$-protected' vertex in a surface $Σ$, then $v$ is redundant with respect to any $k$-linkage.

A graph property (i.e., a set of graphs) is induced-hereditary or additive if it is closed under taking induced-subgraphs or disjoint unions. If $\cP$ and $\cQ$ are properties, the product $\cP \circ \cQ$ consists of all graphs $G$ for which there is a partition of the vertex set of $G$ into (possibly empty) subsets $A$ and $B$ with $G[A] \in \cP$ and $G[B] \in \cQ$. A property is reducible if it is the product of two other properties, and irreducible otherwise. We completely describe the few reducible induced-hereditary properties that have a unique factorisation into irreducibles. Analogs of compositive and additive induced-hereditary properties are introduced and characterised in the style of Scheinerman [{\em Discrete Math}. {\bf 55} (1985) 185--193]. One of these provides an alternative proof that an additive hereditary property factors into irreducible additive hereditary properties.

An additive hereditary graph property is a set of graphs, closed under isomorphism and under taking subgraphs and disjoint unions. Let ${\cal P}_1, >..., {\cal P}_n$ be additive hereditary graph properties. A graph $G$ has property $({\cal P}_1 \circ ... \circ {\cal P}_n)$ if there is a partition $(V_1, ..., V_n)$ of $V(G)$ into $n$ sets such that, for all $i$, the induced subgraph $G[V_i]$ is in ${\cal P}_i$. A property ${\cal P}$ is reducible if there are properties ${\cal Q}$, ${\cal R}$ such that ${\cal P} = {\cal Q} \circ {\cal R}$; otherwise it is irreducible. Mihók, Semanišin and Vasky [J. Graph Theory {\bf 33} (2000), 44--53] gave a factorisation for any additive hereditary property ${\cal P}$ into a given number $dc({\cal P})$ of irreducible additive hereditary factors. Mihók [Discuss. Math. Graph Theory {\bf 20} (2000), 143--153] gave a similar factorisation for properties that are additive and induced-hereditary (closed under taking induced-subgraphs and disjoint unions). Their results left open the possiblity of different factorisations, maybe even with a different number of factors; we prove here that the given factorisations are, in fact, unique.