arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the dimer model on two families of non-bipartite graphs on a torus. The first family is obtained by replacing degree $3$ vertices in a bipartite torus graph with triangles, while the second consists of corner graphs associated with bipartite torus graphs. We determine the relationship between the Newton polygons of these graphs and those of the underlying bipartite graphs. We also identify the primitive edge vectors of the Newton polygons with the homology classes of the zig-zag paths. We further consider the marginal polynomials obtained by restricting to monomials corresponding to a boundary side of the Newton polygon. For the triangular lattice and the Fisher graph of the hexagonal lattice, we prove that these polynomials are real-rooted and obtain an explicit factorization of their roots. Finally, we introduce new local moves, including a move on non-planar graphs, that preserve the dimer partition functions up to a scale.

A complete structural characterization of graphs with no $K_{3,4}$ minor is obtained, and the following consequences are established. Every $4$-connected non-planar graph with at least seven vertices and minimum degree at least five contains both $K_{3,4}$ and $K_6^-$ as minors, thereby proving a conjecture of Kawarabayashi and Maharry in a strengthened form. Moreover, every $4$-connected graph with no $K_{3,4}$ minor is hamiltonian-connected, extending a theorem of Thomassen, and admits an embedding on the torus.

A graph $G$ is called matching covered if all of its edges are contained in some perfect matching of $G$. Furthermore, a cycle $C \subseteq G$ is called conformal if $G - V(C)$ has a perfect matching and $G$ itself is called cycle-conformal if all of its even cycles are conformal. Both matching covered graphs and conformal cycles play central roles in matching theory. After a string of results from various authors, focused mainly on bipartite, planar graphs and claw-free graphs, a complete characterisation of all planar, cycle-conformal graphs has recently been presented by Dalwadi, Pause, Diwan, and Kothari [DMTCS, 2025]. We continue this exploration further into the realm of non-planar graphs, giving a characterisation of matching covered, cycle-conformal graphs that are bipartite and cubic, and respectively, those that are bipartite and Pfaffian. The last class plays a fundamental role in matching theory, having important connections to the problem of counting perfect matchings, recognising graphs with even directed cycles, and computing the permanent of certain matrices efficiently. To prove our results, we break matching covered graphs down to their building blocks, the bipartite ones of which are called braces. The key to both characterisations are theorems that identify the braces in the respective classes. In particular, as our main results, we show that the cycle of length 4 is the only Pfaffian, cycle-conformal brace and we show that $K_{3,3}$ is the only cubic, cycle-conformal brace. In both cases these theorems facilitate the characterisations of the much richer classes of associated matching covered graphs. We conjecture that for each integer $\ell \geq 2$ the only $\ell$-regular, cycle-conformal brace is $K_{\ell,\ell}$.

The chapter presents mathematical models intended for creating a topological drawing of a non-separable non-planar graph based on the methods of G. Ringel's vertex rotation theory. The induced system of cycles generates a topological drawing of a certain thickness. A method for determining the location of imaginary vertices by finding the intersection of connections on a plane is presented. A topological drawing of a maximum planar subgraph is used as a basis.

The Graph Minor Structure Theorem, originally proven by Robertson and Seymour [JCTB, 2003], asserts that there exist functions $f_1, f_2 \colon \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ such that for every non-planar graph $H$ with $t := |V(H)|$, every $H$-minor-free graph can be obtained via the clique-sum operation from graphs which embed into surfaces where $H$ does not embed after deleting at most $f_1(t)$ many vertices with up to at most $t^2-1$ many ``vortices'' which are of ``depth'' at most $f_2(t)$. In the proof presented by Robertson and Seymour the functions $f_1$ and $f_2$ are non-constructive. Kawarabayashi, Thomas, and Wollan [arXiv, 2020] found a new proof showing that $f_1(t), f_2(t) \in 2^{\mathbf{poly}(t)}$. While believing that this bound was the best their methods could achieve, Kawarabayashi, Thomas, and Wollan conjectured that $f_1$ and $f_2$ can be improved to be polynomials. In this paper we confirm their conjecture and prove that $f_1(t), f_2(t) \in \mathbf{O}(t^{2300})$. Our proofs are fully constructive and yield a polynomial-time algorithm that either finds $H$ as a minor in a graph $G$ or produces a clique-sum decomposition for $G$ as above.

A non-planar graph is almost-planar if either deleting or contracting any edge makes it planar. A graph with $n$ vertices is pancyclic if it contains a cycle of every length from $3$ to $n$, and it is Hamiltonian if it contains a cycle of length $n$. A Hamiltonian path is a path of length $n$ and a graph with a Hamiltonian path between every pair of vertices is called Hamiltonian-connected. In 1990, Gubser characterized the class of almost-planar graphs. This paper explores the pancyclicity of these graphs. We prove that a $3$-connected almost-planar graph is pancyclic if and only if it has a cycle of length 3. Furthermore, we prove that a 4-connected almost-planar graph is both pancyclic and Hamiltonian-connected.

The basis number of a graph $G$ is the smallest integer $k$ such that $G$ admits a basis $B$ for its cycle space, where each edge of $G$ belongs to at most $k$ members of $B$. In this note, we show that every non-planar graph that can be embedded on a surface with Euler characteristic $0$ has a basis number of exactly $3$, proving a conjecture of Schmeichel from 1981. Additionally, we show that any graph embedded on a surface $Σ$ (whether orientable or non-orientable) of genus $g$ has a basis number of $O(\log^2 g)$.

We study the impact of forbidding short cycles to the edge density of $k$-planar graphs; a $k$-planar graph is one that can be drawn in the plane with at most $k$ crossings per edge. Specifically, we consider three settings, according to which the forbidden substructures are $3$-cycles, $4$-cycles or both of them (i.e., girth $\ge 5$). For all three settings and all $k\in\{1,2,3\}$, we present lower and upper bounds on the maximum number of edges in any $k$-planar graph on $n$ vertices. Our bounds are of the form $c\,n$, for some explicit constant $c$ that depends on $k$ and on the setting. For general $k \geq 4$ our bounds are of the form $c\sqrt{k}n$, for some explicit constant $c$. These results are obtained by leveraging different techniques, such as the discharging method, the recently introduced density formula for non-planar graphs, and new upper bounds for the crossing number of $2$-- and $3$-planar graphs in combination with corresponding lower bounds based on the Crossing Lemma.

Modern methods of graph theory describe a graph up to isomorphism, which makes it difficult to create mathematical models for visualizing graph drawings on a plane. The topological drawing of the planar part of a graph allows representing the planarization process by algebraic methods, without making any geometric constructions on the plane. Constructing a rotation of graph vertices solves two most important problems of graph theory simultaneously: the problem of testing a graph for planarity and the problem of constructing a topological drawing of a planar graph. It is shown that the problem of constructing a drawing of a non-planar graph can be reduced to the problem of constructing a drawing of a planar graph, taking into account the introduction of additional vertices characterizing the intersection of edges. Naturally, the development of such a mathematical structure will make it possible to solve the following important problems of graph theory: testing the planarity of a graph, identifying the largest planar subgraph of a graph, determining the thickness of a graph, obtaining a graph with a minimum number of intersections, etc.

A visualized graph is a powerful tool for data analysis and synthesis tasks. In this case, the task of visualization constitutes not only in displaying vertices and edges according to the graph representation, but also in ensuring that the result is visually simple and comprehensible for a human. Thus, the visualization process involves solving several problems, one of which is the problem of constructing a topological drawing of a planar part of a non-planar graph with a minimum number of removed edges. In this manuscript, we consider a mathematical model for representing the topological drawing of a graph, which is based on methods of the theory of vertex rotation with the induction of simple cycles that satisfy the Mac Lane planarity criterion. It is shown that the topological drawing of a non-planar graph can be constructed on the basis of a selected planar part of the graph. The topological model of a graph drawing allows us to reduce the brute-force enumeration problem of identifying a plane graph to a discrete optimization problem - searching for a subset of the set of isometric cycles of the graph that satisfy the zero value of the Mac Lane's functional. To isolate the planar part of the graph, a new computational method has been developed based on linear algebra and the algebra of structural numbers. The proposed method has polynomial computational complexity.

In 1986 Robertson and Seymour proved a generalization of the seminal result of Erdős and Pósa on the duality of packing and covering cycles: A graph has the Erdős-Pósa property for minors if and only if it is planar. In particular, for every non-planar graph $H$ they gave examples showing that the Erdős-Pósa property does not hold for $H.$ Recently, Liu confirmed a conjecture of Thomas and showed that every graph has the half-integral Erdős-Pósa property for minors. Liu's proof is non-constructive and to this date, with the exception of a small number of examples, no constructive proof is known. In this paper, we initiate the delineation of the half-integrality of the Erdős-Pósa property for minors. We conjecture that for every graph $H,$ there exists a unique (up to a suitable equivalence relation) graph parameter ${\textsf{EP}}_H$ such that $H$ has the Erdős-Pósa property in a minor-closed graph class $\mathcal{G}$ if and only if $\sup\{\textsf{EP}_H(G) \mid G\in\mathcal{G}\}$ is finite. We prove this conjecture for the class $\mathcal{H}$ of Kuratowski-connected shallow-vortex minors by showing that, for every non-planar $H\in\mathcal{H},$ the parameter ${\sf EP}_H(G)$ is precisely the maximum order of a Robertson-Seymour counterexample to the Erdős-Pósa property of $H$ which can be found as a minor in $G.$ Our results are constructive and imply, for the first time, parameterized algorithms that find either a packing, or a cover, or one of the Robertson-Seymour counterexamples, certifying the existence of a half-integral packing for the graphs in $\mathcal{H}.$

Two recent papers by Kawarabayashi, Thomas and Wollan, "A New Proof of the Flat Wall Theorem" (arXiv:1207.6927) and "Quickly Excluding a Non-Planar Graph" (arXiv:2010.12397) provide major improvements over Robertson and Seymour's original proof of the structure theorem for finite graphs that exclude a given graph. The first paper redefines the notion of a flat wall. Unfortunately, this new notion is too strong. As a result, the new Flat Wall Theorem in that paper is incorrect. A counterexample is given in Appendix A. A follow-on lemma in the first paper, about the transitivity of flatness, is also incorrect, a fact that was noticed by Dimitrios Thilikos et al in arXiv:2102.06463. However, that error is derivative and not the main issue. This paper provides a weaker definition of the notion of a flat wall, provides a correction to the proof of the new Flat Wall Theorem and a new proof of flatness transitivity. The notion of a tight rendition as presented here differs from Thilikos' definition but is defined much more simply, and the notion of a proper cycle is introduced. The notions of certificates and tilted walls used by Thilikos turn out of be unnecessary and transitivity is preserved in its original simplicity and generality. Most importantly, it looks like the new weaker definition of flatness is all that is really necessary to carry through the proof of the structure theorem in the second paper of Kawarabayashi, Thomas and Wollan.

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$, and let $d(u,w)$ denote the length of a $u-w$ geodesic in $G$. For any $v\in V(G)$ and $e=xy\in E(G)$, let $d(e,v)=\min\{d(x,v),d(y,v)\}$. For distinct $e_1, e_2\in E(G)$, let $R\{e_1,e_2\}=\{z\in V(G):d(z,e_1)\neq d(z,e_2)\}$. Kelenc et al. [Discrete Appl. Math. 251 (2018) 204-220] introduced the edge dimension of a graph: A vertex subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ is an edge resolving set of $G$ if $|S\cap R\{e_1,e_2\}|\ge 1$ for any distinct $e_1, e_2\in E(G)$, and the edge dimension $edim(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality among all edge resolving sets of $G$. For a real-valued function $g$ defined on $V(G)$ and for $U\subseteq V(G)$, let $g(U)=\sum_{s\in U}g(s)$. Then $g:V(G)\rightarrow[0,1]$ is an edge resolving function of $G$ if $g(R\{e_1,e_2\})\ge1$ for any distinct $e_1,e_2\in E(G)$. The fractional edge dimension $edim_f(G)$ of $G$ is $\min\{g(V(G)):g\mbox{ is an edge resolving function of }G\}$. Note that $edim_f(G)$ reduces to $edim(G)$ if the codomain of edge resolving functions is restricted to $\{0,1\}$. We introduce and study fractional edge dimension and obtain some general results on the edge dimension of graphs. We show that there exist two non-isomorphic graphs on the same vertex set with the same edge metric coordinates. We construct two graphs $G$ and $H$ such that $H \subset G$ and both $edim(H)-edim(G)$ and $edim_f(H)-edim_f(G)$ can be arbitrarily large. We show that a graph $G$ with $edim(G)=2$ cannot have $K_5$ or $K_{3,3}$ as a subgraph, and we construct a non-planar graph $H$ satisfying $edim(H)=2$. It is easy to see that, for any connected graph $G$ of order $n\ge3$, $1\le edim_f(G) \le \frac{n}{2}$; we characterize graphs $G$ satisfying $edim_f(G)=1$ and examine some graph classes satisfying $edim_f(G)=\frac{n}{2}$. We also determine the fractional edge dimension for some classes of graphs.

In 1930, Kuratowski showed that $K_{3,3}$ and $K_5$ are the only two minor-minimal non-planar graphs. Robertson and Seymour extended finiteness of the set of forbidden minors for any surface. Širáň and Kochol showed that there are infinitely many $k$-crossing-critical graphs for any $k\ge 2$, even if restricted to simple $3$-connected graphs. Recently, $2$-crossing-critical graphs have been completely characterized by Bokal, Oporowski, Richter, and Salazar. We present a simplified description of large 2-crossing-critical graphs and use this simplification to count Hamiltonian cycles in such graphs. We generalize this approach to an algorithm counting Hamiltonian cycles in all 2-tiled graphs, thus extending the results of Bodroža-Pantić, Kwong, Doroslovački, and Pantić for $n = 2$.

Let $Oct_{1}^{+}$ and $Oct_{2}^{+}$ be the planar and non-planar graphs that obtained from the Octahedron by 3-splitting a vertex respectively. For $Oct_{1}^{+}$, we prove that a 4-connected graph is $Oct_{1}^{+}$-free if and only if it is $C_{6}^{2}$, $C_{2k+1}^{2}$ $(k \geq 2)$ or it is obtained from $C_{5}^{2}$ by repeatedly 4-splitting vertices. We also show that a planar graph is $Oct_{1}^{+}$-free if and only if it is constructed by repeatedly taking 0-, 1-, 2-sums starting from $\{K_{1}, K_{2} ,K_{3}\} \cup \mathscr{K} \cup \{Oct,L_{5} \}$, where $\mathscr{K}$ is the set of graphs obtained by repeatedly taking the special 3-sums of $K_{4}$. For $Oct_{2}^{+}$, we prove that a 4-connected graph is $Oct_{2}^{+}$-free if and only if it is planar, $C_{2k+1}^{2}$ $(k \geq 2)$, $L(K_{3,3})$ or it is obtained from $C_{5}^{2}$ by repeatedly 4-splitting vertices.

A cornerstone theorem in the Graph Minors series of Robertson and Seymour is the result that every graph $G$ with no minor isomorphic to a fixed graph $H$ has a certain structure. The structure can then be exploited to deduce far-reaching consequences. The exact statement requires some explanation, but roughly it says that there exist integers $k,n$ depending on $H$ only such that $0<k<n$ and for every $n\times n$ grid minor $J$ of $G$ the graph $G$ has a a $k$-near embedding in a surface $Σ$ that does not embed $H$ in such a way that a substantial part of $J$ is embedded in $Σ$. Here a $k$-near embedding means that after deleting at most $k$ vertices the graph can be drawn in $Σ$ without crossings, except for local areas of non-planarity, where crossings are permitted, but at most $k$ of these areas are attached to the rest of the graph by four or more vertices and inside those the graph is constrained in a different way, again depending on the parameter $k$. The original and only proof so far is quite long and uses many results developed in the Graph Minors series. We give a proof that uses only our earlier paper [A new proof of the flat wall theorem, {\it J.~Combin.\ Theory Ser.\ B \bf 129} (2018), 158--203] and results from graduate textbooks. Our proof is constructive and yields a polynomial time algorithm to construct such a structure. We also give explicit constants for the structure theorem, whereas the original proof only guarantees the existence of such constants.

Recently, a combinatorial interpretation of Baldoni and Vergne's generalized Lidskii formula for the volume of a flow polytope was developed by Benedetti et al.. This converts the problem of computing Kostant partition functions into a problem of enumerating a set of objects called unified diagrams. We devise an enhanced version of this combinatorial model to compute the volumes of flow polytopes defined on a family of graphs called the k-caracol graphs, resulting in the first application of the model to non-planar graphs. At k=1 and k=n-1, we recover results for the classical caracol graph and the Pitman--Stanley graph. Furthermore, we introduce the notion of in-degree gravity diagrams for flow polytopes, which are equinumerous with (out-degree) gravity diagrams considered by Benedetti et al.. We show that for the k-caracol flow polytopes, these two kinds of gravity diagrams satisfy a natural combinatorial correspondence, which raises an intriguing question on the relationship in the geometry of two related polytopes.

Beyond-planarity focuses on combinatorial properties of classes of non-planar graphs that allow for representations satisfying certain local geometric or topological constraints on their edge crossings. Beside the study of a specific graph class for its maximum edge density, another parameter that is often considered in the literature is the size of the largest complete or complete bipartite graph belonging to it. Overcoming the limitations of standard combinatorial arguments, we present a technique to systematically generate all non-isomorphic topological representations of complete and complete bipartite graphs, taking into account the constraints of the specific class. As a proof of concept, we apply our technique to various beyond-planarity classes and achieve new tight bounds for the aforementioned parameter.

The notion of metric dimension, $dim(G)$, of a graph $G$, as well as a number of variants, is now well studied. In this paper, we begin a local analysis of this notion by introducing $cdim_G(v)$, \emph{the connected metric dimension of $G$ at a vertex $v$}, which is defined as follows: a set of vertices $S$ of $G$ is a \emph{resolving set} if, for any pair of distinct vertices $x$ and $y$ of $G$, there is a vertex $z \in S$ such that the distance between $z$ and $x$ is distinct from the distance between $z$ and $y$ in $G$. We call a resolving set $S$ \emph{connected} if $S$ induces a connected subgraph of $G$. Then, $cdim_G(v)$ is defined to be the minimum of the cardinalities of all connected resolving sets which contain the vertex $v$. The \emph{connected metric dimension of $G$}, denoted by $cdim(G)$, is $\min\{cdim_G(v): v \in V(G)\}$. Noting that $1 \le dim(G) \le cdim(G) \le cdim_G(v) \le |V(G)|-1$ for any vertex $v$ of $G$, we show the existence of a pair $(G,v)$ such that $cdim_G(v)$ takes all positive integer values from $dim(G)$ to $|V (G)|-1$, as $v$ varies in a fixed graph $G$. We characterize graphs $G$ and their vertices $v$ satisfying $cdim_G(v) \in \{1, |V(G)|-1\}$. We show that $cdim(G)=2$ implies $G$ is planar, whereas it is well known that there is a non-planar graph $H$ with $dim(H)=2$. We also characterize trees and unicyclic graphs $G$ satisfying $cdim(G)=dim(G)$. We show that $cdim(G)-dim(G)$ can be arbitrarily large. We determine $cdim(G)$ and $cdim_G(v)$ for some classes of graphs. We further examine the effect of vertex or edge deletion on the connected metric dimension. We conclude with some open problems.

We establish a quadratic identity for the Yamada polynomial of ribbon cubic graphs in 3-space, extending the Tutte golden identity for planar cubic graphs. An application is given to the structure of the flow polynomial of cubic graphs at zero. The golden identity for the flow polynomial is conjectured to characterize planarity of cubic graphs, and we prove this conjecture for a certain infinite family of non-planar graphs. Further, we establish exponential growth of the number of chromatic polynomials of planar triangulations, answering a question of D. Treumann and E. Zaslow. The structure underlying these results is the chromatic algebra, and more generally the SO(3) topological quantum field theory.