arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Prosenjit Bose

23 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
3-packings in Triangulations: Algorithms, bounds, and Complexity
We study $H$-packings in plane triangulations for the three-vertex graphs $H\in\{P_3,K_3,P_2\cup P_1\}$. For a graph $H$, let $λ_H(G)$ denote the maximum size of an $H$-packing in $G$, with the convention that for $H=P_2\cup P_1$ the copies are required to be induced. For $P_3$-packings, we prove that every triangulation $G$ on $n$ vertices satisfies $λ_{P_3}(G)\ge \left\lfloor \frac n5\right\rfloor$, and show that this lower bound is asymptotically tight. We also study triangle packings in triangulations and provide lower bounds for $λ_{K_3}(G)$ in terms of the maximum degree and the degree sequence. We give a face-path characterization of triangle factors in $4$-connected plane triangulations using a hamiltonian cycle and the weak duals of the two associated maximal outerplanar graphs. Finally, for induced packings by $P_2\cup P_1$, we prove that every plane triangulation $T$ on $n$ vertices satisfies $λ_{P_2\cup P_1}(T)\ge \left\lfloor \frac n3\right\rfloor-2$, and show that such a packing can be found in polynomial time.
Cops and robber in graphs with bounded vertex cover number
Meyniel's conjecture states that $n$-vertex connected graphs have cop number $O(\sqrt{n})$. The current best known upper bound is $n/2^{(1-o(1))\sqrt{\log n}}$, proved independently by Lu and Peng (2011), and by Scott and Sudakov (2011). In this paper, we extend their result by showing that every connected graph with vertex cover number $k$ has cop number at most $k/2^{(1-o(1))\sqrt{\log k}}$. This is the first sublinear upper bound on the cop number in terms of the vertex cover number.
2025-04-18 v2
Cops and Robbers for Graphs on Surfaces with Crossings
Cops and Robbers is a game played on a graph where a set of cops attempt to capture a single robber. The game proceeds in rounds, where each round first consists of the cops' turn, followed by the robber's turn. In the cops' turn, every cop can choose to either stay on the same vertex or move to an adjacent vertex, and likewise the robber in his turn. The robber is considered to be captured if, at any point in time, there is some cop on the same vertex as the robber. A natural question in this game concerns the cop-number of a graph -- the minimum number of cops needed to capture the robber. It has long been known that graphs embeddable (without crossings) on surfaces of bounded genus have bounded cop-number. In contrast, the class of 1-planar graphs -- graphs that can be drawn on the plane with at most one crossing per edge -- does not have bounded cop-number. This paper initiates an investigation into how distance between crossing pairs of edges influences a graph's cop number. In particular, we look at Distance $d$ Cops and Robbers, a variant of the classical game, where the robber is considered to be captured if there is a cop within distance $d$ of the robber. Let $c_d(G)$ denote the minimum number of cops required in the graph $G$ to capture a robber within distance $d$. We look at various classes of graphs, such as 1-plane graphs, $k$-plane graphs (graphs where each edge is crossed at most $k$ times), and even general graph drawings, and show that if every crossing pair of edges can be connected by a path of small length, then $c_d(G)$ is bounded, for small values of $d$.
The basis number of 1-planar graphs
Let $B$ be a set of Eulerian subgraphs of a graph $G$. We say $B$ forms a $k$-basis if it is a minimum set that generates the cycle space of $G$, and any edge of $G$ lies in at most $k$ members of $B$. The basis number of a graph $G$, denoted by $b(G)$, is the smallest integer such that $G$ has a $k$-basis. A graph is called 1-planar (resp. planar) if it can be embedded in the plane with at most one crossing (resp. no crossing) per edge. MacLane's planarity criterion characterizes planar graphs based on their cycle space, stating that a graph is planar if and only if it has a $2$-basis. We study here the basis number of 1-planar graphs, demonstrate that it is unbounded in general, and show that it is bounded for many subclasses of 1-planar graphs.
2024-11-04
On the $d$-independence number in 1-planar graphs
The $d$-independence number of a graph $G$ is the largest possible size of an independent set $I$ in $G$ where each vertex of $I$ has degree at least $d$ in $G$. Upper bounds for the $d$-independence number in planar graphs are well-known for $d=3,4,5$, and can in fact be matched with constructions that actually have minimum degree $d$. In this paper, we explore the same questions for 1-planar graphs, i.e., graphs that can be drawn in the plane with at most one crossing per edge. We give upper bounds for the $d$-independence number for all $d$. Then we give constructions that match the upper bound, and (for small $d$) also have minimum degree $d$.
On 1-Planar Graphs with Bounded Cop-Number
Cops and Robbers is a type of pursuit-evasion game played on a graph where a set of cops try to capture a single robber. The cops first choose their initial vertex positions, and later the robber chooses a vertex. The cops and robbers make their moves in alternate turns: in the cops' turn, every cop can either choose to move to an adjacent vertex or stay on the same vertex, and likewise the robber in his turn. If the cops can capture the robber in a finite number of rounds, the cops win, otherwise the robber wins. The cop-number of a graph is the minimum number of cops required to catch a robber in the graph. It has long been known that graphs embedded on surfaces (such as planar graphs and toroidal graphs) have a small cop-number. Recently, Durocher et al. [Graph Drawing, 2023] investigated the problem of cop-number for the class of $1$-planar graphs, which are graphs that can be embedded in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once. They showed that unlike planar graphs which require just three cops, 1-planar graphs have an unbounded cop-number. On the positive side, they showed that maximal 1-planar graphs require only three cops by crucially using the fact that the endpoints of every crossing in an embedded maximal 1-planar graph induce a $K_4$. In this paper, we show that the cop-number remains bounded even under the relaxed condition that the endpoints induce at least three edges. More precisely, let an $\times$-crossing of an embedded 1-planar graph be a crossing whose endpoints induce a matching; i.e., there is no edge connecting the endpoints apart from the crossing edges themselves. We show that any 1-planar graph that can be embedded without $\times$-crossings has cop-number at most 21. Moreover, any 1-planar graph that can be embedded with at most $γ$ $\times$-crossings has cop-number at most $γ+ 21$.
On $k$-planar Graphs without Short Cycles
We study the impact of forbidding short cycles to the edge density of $k$-planar graphs; a $k$-planar graph is one that can be drawn in the plane with at most $k$ crossings per edge. Specifically, we consider three settings, according to which the forbidden substructures are $3$-cycles, $4$-cycles or both of them (i.e., girth $\ge 5$). For all three settings and all $k\in\{1,2,3\}$, we present lower and upper bounds on the maximum number of edges in any $k$-planar graph on $n$ vertices. Our bounds are of the form $c\,n$, for some explicit constant $c$ that depends on $k$ and on the setting. For general $k \geq 4$ our bounds are of the form $c\sqrt{k}n$, for some explicit constant $c$. These results are obtained by leveraging different techniques, such as the discharging method, the recently introduced density formula for non-planar graphs, and new upper bounds for the crossing number of $2$-- and $3$-planar graphs in combination with corresponding lower bounds based on the Crossing Lemma.
2024-06-30 v2
Computing Vertex and Edge Connectivity of Graphs Embedded with Crossings
Vertex connectivity and edge connectivity are fundamental concepts in graph theory that have been widely studied from both structural and algorithmic perspectives. The focus of this paper is on computing these two parameters for graphs embedded on the plane with crossings. For planar graphs -- which can be embedded on the plane without any crossings -- it has long been known that vertex and edge connectivity can be computed in linear time. Recently, the algorithm for vertex connectivity was extended from planar graphs to 1-plane graphs (where each edge is crossed at most once) without $\times$-crossings -- these are crossings whose endpoints induce a matching. The key insight, for both these classes of graphs, is that any two vertices/edges of a minimum vertex/edge cut have small face-distance (distance measured by number of faces) in the embedding. In this paper, we attempt at a comprehensive generalization of this idea to a wider class of graphs embedded on the plane. Our method works for all those embedded graphs where every pair of crossing edges is connected by a path whose vertices and edges have a small face-distance from the crossing point. Important examples of such graphs include optimal 2-planar and optimal 3-planar graphs, $d$-map graphs, $d$-framed graphs, graphs with bounded crossing number, and $k$-plane graphs with bounded number of $\times$-crossings. For all these graph classes, we get a linear-time algorithm for computing vertex and edge connectivity.
On Separating Path and Tree Systems in Graphs
Published in Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 27:2, Graph Theory (May 20, 2025) dmtcs:12743 • View PublicationBIB
We explore the concept of separating systems of vertex sets of graphs. A separating system of a set $X$ is a collection of subsets of $X$ such that for any pair of distinct elements in $X$, there exists a set in the separating system that contains exactly one of the two elements. A separating system of the vertex set of a graph $G$ is called a vertex-separating path (tree) system of $G$ if the elements of the separating system are paths (trees) in the graph $G$. In this paper, we focus on the size of the smallest vertex-separating path (tree) system for different types of graphs, including trees, grids, and maximal outerplanar graphs.
Connected Dominating Sets in Triangulations
We show that every $n$-vertex triangulation has a connected dominating set of size at most $10n/21$. Equivalently, every $n$ vertex triangulation has a spanning tree with at least $11n/21$ leaves. Prior to the current work, the best known bounds were $n/2$, which follows from work of Albertson, Berman, Hutchinson, and Thomassen (J. Graph Theory \textbf{14}(2):247--258). One immediate consequence of this result is an improved bound for the SEFENOMAP graph drawing problem of Angelini, Evans, Frati, and Gudmundsson (J. Graph Theory \textbf{82}(1):45--64). As a second application, we show that for every set $P$ of $\lceil 11n/21\rceil$ points in $\R^2$ every $n$-vertex planar graph has a one-bend non-crossing drawing in which some set of $11n/21$ vertices is drawn on the points of $P$. The main result extends to $n$-vertex triangulations of genus-$g$ surfaces, and implies that these have connected dominating sets of size at most $10n/21+O(\sqrt{gn})$.
Linear versus centred chromatic numbers
$\DeclareMathOperator{\chicen}{χ_{\mathrm{cen}}}\DeclareMathOperator{\chilin}{χ_{\mathrm{lin}}}$ A centred colouring of a graph is a vertex colouring in which every connected subgraph contains a vertex whose colour is unique and a \emph{linear colouring} is a vertex colouring in which every (not-necessarily induced) path contains a vertex whose colour is unique. For a graph $G$, the centred chromatic number $\chicen(G)$ and the linear chromatic number $\chilin(G)$ denote the minimum number of distinct colours required for a centred, respectively, linear colouring of $G$. From these definitions, it follows immediately that $\chilin(G)\le \chicen(G)$ for every graph $G$. The centred chromatic number is equivalent to treedepth and has been studied extensively. Much less is known about linear colouring. Kun et al [Algorithmica 83(1)] prove that $\chicen(G) \le \tilde{O}(\chilin(G)^{190})$ for any graph $G$ and conjecture that $\chicen(G)\le 2\chilin(G)$. Their upper bound was subsequently improved by Czerwinski et al [SIDMA 35(2)] to $\chicen(G)\le\tilde{O}(\chilin(G)^{19})$. The proof of both upper bounds relies on establishing a lower bound on the linear chromatic number of pseudogrids, which appear in the proof due to their critical relationship to treewidth. Specifically, Kun et al prove that $k\times k$ pseudogrids have linear chromatic number $Ω(\sqrt{k})$. Our main contribution is establishing a tight bound on the linear chromatic number of pseudogrids, specifically $\chilin(G)\ge Ω(k)$ for every $k\times k$ pseudogrid $G$. As a consequence we improve the general bound for all graphs to $\chicen(G)\le \tilde{O}(\chilin(G)^{10})$. In addition, this tight bound gives further evidence in support of Kun et al's conjecture (above) that the centred chromatic number of any graph is upper bounded by a linear function of its linear chromatic number.
Pursuit-Evasion in Graphs: Zombies, Lazy Zombies and a Survivor
Published • View PublicationBIB
We study zombies and survivor, a variant of the game of cops and robber on graphs. In this variant, the single survivor plays the role of the robber and attempts to escape from the zombies that play the role of the cops. The zombies are restricted, on their turn, to always follow an edge of a shortest path towards the survivor. Let $z(G)$ be the smallest number of zombies required to catch the survivor on a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices. We show that there exist outerplanar graphs and visibility graphs of simple polygons such that $z(G) = Θ(n)$. We also show that there exist maximum-degree-$3$ outerplanar graphs such that $z(G) = Ω\left(n/\log(n)\right)$. Let $z_L(G)$ be the smallest number of lazy zombies (zombies that can stay still on their turn) required to catch the survivor on a graph $G$. We establish that lazy zombies are more powerful than normal zombies but less powerful than cops. We prove that $z_L(G) = 2$ for connected outerplanar graphs. We show that $z_L(G)\leq k$ for connected graphs with treedepth $k$. This result implies that $z_L(G)$ is at most $(k+1)\log n$ for connected graphs with treewidth $k$, $O(\sqrt{n})$ for connected planar graphs, $O(\sqrt{gn})$ for connected graphs with genus $g$ and $O(h\sqrt{hn})$ for connected graphs with any excluded $h$-vertex minor. Our results on lazy zombies still hold when an adversary chooses the initial positions of the zombies.
2022-02-17
An Optimal Algorithm for Product Structure in Planar Graphs
The \emph{Product Structure Theorem} for planar graphs (Dujmović et al.\ \emph{JACM}, \textbf{67}(4):22) states that any planar graph is contained in the strong product of a planar $3$-tree, a path, and a $3$-cycle. We give a simple linear-time algorithm for finding this decomposition as well as several related decompositions. This improves on the previous $O(n\log n)$ time algorithm (Morin.\ \emph{Algorithmica}, \textbf{85}(5):1544--1558).
Separating layered treewidth and row treewidth
Published in Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 24, no. 1, Graph Theory (May 13, 2022) dmtcs:7458 • View PublicationBIB
Layered treewidth and row treewidth are recently introduced graph parameters that have been key ingredients in the solution of several well-known open problems. It follows from the definitions that the layered treewidth of a graph is at most its row treewidth plus 1. Moreover, a minor-closed class has bounded layered treewidth if and only if it has bounded row treewidth. However, it has been open whether row treewidth is bounded by a function of layered treewidth. This paper answers this question in the negative. In particular, for every integer $k$ we describe a graph with layered treewidth 1 and row treewidth $k$. We also prove an analogous result for layered pathwidth and row pathwidth.
Asymptotically Optimal Vertex Ranking of Planar Graphs
A (vertex) $\ell$-ranking is a colouring $\varphi:V(G)\to\mathbb{N}$ of the vertices of a graph $G$ with integer colours so that for any path $u_0,\ldots,u_p$ of length at most $\ell$, $\varphi(u_0)\neq\varphi(u_p)$ or $\varphi(u_0)<\max\{\varphi(u_0),\ldots,\varphi(u_p)\}$. We show that, for any fixed integer $\ell\ge 2$, every $n$-vertex planar graph has an $\ell$-ranking using $O(\log n/\log\log\log n)$ colours and this is tight even when $\ell=2$; for infinitely many values of $n$, there are $n$-vertex planar graphs, for which any 2-ranking requires $Ω(\log n/\log\log\log n)$ colours. This result also extends to bounded genus graphs. In developing this proof we obtain optimal bounds on the number of colours needed for $\ell$-ranking graphs of treewidth $t$ and graphs of simple treewidth $t$. These upper bounds are constructive and give $O(n)$-time algorithms. Additional results that come from our techniques include new sublogarithmic upper bounds on the number of colours needed for $\ell$-rankings of apex minor-free graphs and $k$-planar graphs.
Drawing Graphs as Spanners
Published • View PublicationBIB
We study the problem of embedding graphs in the plane as good geometric spanners. That is, for a graph $G$, the goal is to construct a straight-line drawing $Γ$ of $G$ in the plane such that, for any two vertices $u$ and $v$ of $G$, the ratio between the minimum length of any path from $u$ to $v$ and the Euclidean distance between $u$ and $v$ is small. The maximum such ratio, over all pairs of vertices of $G$, is the spanning ratio of $Γ$. First, we show that deciding whether a graph admits a straight-line drawing with spanning ratio $1$, a proper straight-line drawing with spanning ratio $1$, and a planar straight-line drawing with spanning ratio $1$ are NP-complete, $\exists \mathbb R$-complete, and linear-time solvable problems, respectively, where a drawing is proper if no two vertices overlap and no edge overlaps a vertex. Second, we show that moving from spanning ratio $1$ to spanning ratio $1+ε$ allows us to draw every graph. Namely, we prove that, for every $ε>0$, every (planar) graph admits a proper (resp. planar) straight-line drawing with spanning ratio smaller than $1+ε$. Third, our drawings with spanning ratio smaller than $1+ε$ have large edge-length ratio, that is, the ratio between the length of the longest edge and the length of the shortest edge is exponential. We show that this is sometimes unavoidable. More generally, we identify having bounded toughness as the criterion that distinguishes graphs that admit straight-line drawings with constant spanning ratio and polynomial edge-length ratio from graphs that require exponential edge-length ratio in any straight-line drawing with constant spanning ratio.
Pole Dancing: 3D Morphs for Tree Drawings
Published • View PublicationBIB
We study the question whether a crossing-free 3D morph between two straight-line drawings of an $n$-vertex tree can be constructed consisting of a small number of linear morphing steps. We look both at the case in which the two given drawings are two-dimensional and at the one in which they are three-dimensional. In the former setting we prove that a crossing-free 3D morph always exists with $O(\log n)$ steps, while for the latter $Θ(n)$ steps are always sufficient and sometimes necessary.
New Bounds for Facial Nonrepetitive Colouring
Published • View PublicationBIB
We prove that the facial nonrepetitive chromatic number of any outerplanar graph is at most 11 and of any planar graph is at most 22.
Every Large Point Set contains Many Collinear Points or an Empty Pentagon
Published in Graphs and Combinatorics 27(1), (2011), 47-60 • View PublicationBIB
We prove the following generalised empty pentagon theorem: for every integer $\ell \geq 2$, every sufficiently large set of points in the plane contains $\ell$ collinear points or an empty pentagon. As an application, we settle the next open case of the "big line or big clique" conjecture of Kára, Pór, and Wood [\emph{Discrete Comput. Geom.} 34(3):497--506, 2005].
A polynomial bound for untangling geometric planar graphs
Published in Discrete & Computational Geometry 42(4):570-585, 2009 • View PublicationBIB
To untangle a geometric graph means to move some of the vertices so that the resulting geometric graph has no crossings. Pach and Tardos [Discrete Comput. Geom., 2002] asked if every n-vertex geometric planar graph can be untangled while keeping at least n^εvertices fixed. We answer this question in the affirmative with ε=1/4. The previous best known bound was Ω((\log n / \log\log n)^{1/2}). We also consider untangling geometric trees. It is known that every n-vertex geometric tree can be untangled while keeping at least (n/3)^{1/2} vertices fixed, while the best upper bound was O(n\log n)^{2/3}. We answer a question of Spillner and Wolff [arXiv:0709.0170 2007] by closing this gap for untangling trees. In particular, we show that for infinitely many values of n, there is an n-vertex geometric tree that cannot be untangled while keeping more than 3(n^{1/2}-1) vertices fixed. Moreover, we improve the lower bound to (n/2)^{1/2}.