arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the question whether a crossing-free 3D morph between two straight-line drawings of an $n$-vertex tree can be constructed consisting of a small number of linear morphing steps. We look both at the case in which the two given drawings are two-dimensional and at the one in which they are three-dimensional. In the former setting we prove that a crossing-free 3D morph always exists with $O(\log n)$ steps, while for the latter $Θ(n)$ steps are always sufficient and sometimes necessary.

We consider a natural notion of search trees on graphs, which we show is ubiquitous in various areas of discrete mathematics and computer science. Search trees on graphs can be modified by local operations called rotations, which generalize rotations in binary search trees. The rotation graph of search trees on a graph $G$ is the skeleton of a polytope called the graph associahedron of $G$. We consider the case where the graph $G$ is a tree. We construct a family of trees $G$ on $n$ vertices and pairs of search trees on $G$ such that the minimum number of rotations required to transform one search tree into the other is $Ω(n\log n)$. This implies that the worst-case diameter of tree associahedra is $Θ(n\log n)$, which answers a question from Thibault Manneville and Vincent Pilaud. The proof relies on a notion of projection of a search tree which may be of independent interest.

Let $k$ and $p$ be positive integers and let $Q$ be a finite point set in general position in the plane. We say that $Q$ is $(k,p)$-Ramsey if there is a finite point set $P$ such that for every $k$-coloring $c$ of $\binom{P}{p}$ there is a subset $Q'$ of $P$ such that $Q'$ and $Q$ have the same order type and $\binom{Q'}{p}$ is monochromatic in $c$. Nešetřil and Valtr proved that for every $k \in \mathbb{N}$, all point sets are $(k,1)$-Ramsey. They also proved that for every $k \ge 2$ and $p \ge 2$, there are point sets that are not $(k,p)$-Ramsey. As our main result, we introduce a new family of $(k,2)$-Ramsey point sets, extending a result of Nešetřil and Valtr. We then use this new result to show that for every $k$ there is a point set $P$ such that no function $Γ$ that maps ordered pairs of distinct points from $P$ to a set of size $k$ can satisfy the following "local consistency" property: if $Γ$ attains the same values on two ordered triples of points from $P$, then these triples have the same orientation. Intuitively, this implies that there cannot be such a function that is defined locally and determines the orientation of point triples.

This paper studies problems related to visibility among points in the plane. A point $x$ \emph{blocks} two points $v$ and $w$ if $x$ is in the interior of the line segment $\bar{vw}$. A set of points $P$ is \emph{$k$-blocked} if each point in $P$ is assigned one of $k$ colours, such that distinct points $v,w\in P$ are assigned the same colour if and only if some other point in $P$ blocks $v$ and $w$. The focus of this paper is the conjecture that each $k$-blocked set has bounded size (as a function of $k$). Results in the literature imply that every 2-blocked set has at most 3 points, and every 3-blocked set has at most 6 points. We prove that every 4-blocked set has at most 12 points, and that this bound is tight. In fact, we characterise all sets $\{n_1,n_2,n_3,n_4\}$ such that some 4-blocked set has exactly $n_i$ points in the $i$-th colour class. Amongst other results, for infinitely many values of $k$, we construct $k$-blocked sets with $k^{1.79...}$ points.

We prove the following generalised empty pentagon theorem: for every integer $\ell \geq 2$, every sufficiently large set of points in the plane contains $\ell$ collinear points or an empty pentagon. As an application, we settle the next open case of the "big line or big clique" conjecture of Kára, Pór, and Wood [\emph{Discrete Comput. Geom.} 34(3):497--506, 2005].

To untangle a geometric graph means to move some of the vertices so that the resulting geometric graph has no crossings. Pach and Tardos [Discrete Comput. Geom., 2002] asked if every n-vertex geometric planar graph can be untangled while keeping at least n^εvertices fixed. We answer this question in the affirmative with ε=1/4. The previous best known bound was Ω((\log n / \log\log n)^{1/2}). We also consider untangling geometric trees. It is known that every n-vertex geometric tree can be untangled while keeping at least (n/3)^{1/2} vertices fixed, while the best upper bound was O(n\log n)^{2/3}. We answer a question of Spillner and Wolff [arXiv:0709.0170 2007] by closing this gap for untangling trees. In particular, we show that for infinitely many values of n, there is an n-vertex geometric tree that cannot be untangled while keeping more than 3(n^{1/2}-1) vertices fixed. Moreover, we improve the lower bound to (n/2)^{1/2}.

A graph G is a 2-tree if G=K_3, or G has a vertex v of degree 2, whose neighbours are adjacent, and Gǐs a 2-tree. A characterization of the degree sequences of 2-trees is given. This characterization yields a linear-time algorithm for recognizing and realizing degree sequences of 2-trees.