arXiv++ Combinatorics

Spanning trees are fundamental for efficient communication in networks. For fault-tolerant communication, it is desirable to have multiple spanning trees to ensure resilience against failures of nodes and edges. To this end, various notions of disjoint or independent spanning trees have been studied, including edge-disjoint, node/edge-independent, and completely independent spanning trees. Alongside these, several Steiner variants have also been investigated, where the trees are required to span a designated subset of vertices called terminals. For instance, the study of edge-disjoint spanning trees has been extended to edge-disjoint Steiner trees; a stronger variant is the problem of internally disjoint Steiner trees, where any two Steiner trees intersect exactly in the terminals. In this paper, we investigate the Steiner analogue of completely independent spanning trees, which we call \emph{completely independent Steiner trees}. A set of Steiner trees is completely independent if, for every pair of terminals $u,v$, the $(u,v)$-paths in all the Steiner trees are internally vertex-disjoint and edge-disjoint. This notion generalizes both completely independent spanning trees and internally disjoint Steiner trees. We provide a systematic study of completely independent Steiner trees from structural, algorithmic, and complexity-theoretic perspectives. In particular, we present several characterisations, connectivity bounds, algorithms, hardness results, and applications to special graph classes such as planar graphs and graphs of bounded treewidth. Along the way, we also introduce a directed variant of completely independent spanning trees via an equivalence with completely independent Steiner trees.

The \emph{interestingness score} of a directed path $Π= e_1, e_2, e_3, \dots, e_\ell$ in an edge-weighted directed graph $G$ is defined as $\texttt{score}(Π) := \sum_{i=1}^\ell w(e_i) \cdot \log{(i+1)}$, where $w(e_i)$ is the weight of the edge $e_i$. We consider two optimization problems that arise in the analysis of Mapper graphs, which is a powerful tool in topological data analysis. In the IP problem, the objective is to find a collection $\mathcal{P}$ of edge-disjoint paths in $G$ with the maximum total interestingness score. %; that is, two raised to the power of the sum of the weights of the paths in $\mathcal{P}$. For $k \in \mathbb{N}$, the $k$-IP problem is a variant of the IP problem with the extra constraint that each path in $\mathcal{P}$ must have exactly $k$ edges. Kalyanaraman, Kamruzzaman, and Krishnamoorthy (Journal of Computational Geometry, 2019) claim that both IP and $k$-IP (for $k \geq 3$) are NP-complete. We point out some inaccuracies in their proofs. Furthermore, we show that both problems are NP-hard in directed acyclic graphs.

We explore the concept of separating systems of vertex sets of graphs. A separating system of a set $X$ is a collection of subsets of $X$ such that for any pair of distinct elements in $X$, there exists a set in the separating system that contains exactly one of the two elements. A separating system of the vertex set of a graph $G$ is called a vertex-separating path (tree) system of $G$ if the elements of the separating system are paths (trees) in the graph $G$. In this paper, we focus on the size of the smallest vertex-separating path (tree) system for different types of graphs, including trees, grids, and maximal outerplanar graphs.

The clique chromatic number of a graph is the minimum number of colours needed to colour its vertices so that no inclusion-wise maximal clique which is not an isolated vertex is monochromatic. We show that every graph of maximum degree $Δ$ has clique chromatic number $O\left(\fracΔ{\log~Δ}\right)$. We obtain as a corollary that every $n$-vertex graph has clique chromatic number $O\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{\log ~n}}\right)$. Both these results are tight.

A random geometric graph, $G(n,r)$, is formed by choosing $n$ points independently and uniformly at random in a unit square; two points are connected by a straight-line edge if they are at Euclidean distance at most $r$. For a given constant $k$, we show that $n^{\frac{-k}{2k-2}}$ is a distance threshold function for $G(n,r)$ to have a connected subgraph on $k$ points. Based on this, we show that $n^{-2/3}$ is a distance threshold for $G(n,r)$ to be plane, and $n^{-5/8}$ is a distance threshold to be planar. We also investigate distance thresholds for $G(n,r)$ to have a non-crossing edge, a clique of a given size, and an independent set of a given size.