arXiv++ Combinatorics

The \emph{Wiener index} is one of the most widely studied parameters in chemical graph theory. It is defined as the sum of the lengths of the shortest paths between all unordered pairs of vertices in a given graph. In 1991, Šoltés posed the following problem regarding the Wiener index: Find all graphs such that its Wiener index is preserved upon removal of any vertex. The problem is far from being solved and to this day, only one graph with such property is known: the cycle graph on 11 vertices. In this paper, we solve a relaxed version of the problem, proposed by Knor et al.\ in 2018. For a given $k$, the problem is to find (infinitely many) graphs having exactly $k$ vertices such that the Wiener index remains the same after removing any of them. We call these vertices \emph{good} vertices and we show that there are infinitely many cactus graphs with exactly $k$ cycles of length at least 7 that contain exactly $2k$ good vertices and infinitely many cactus graphs with exactly $k$ cycles of length $c \in \{5,6\}$ that contain exactly $k$ good vertices. On the other hand, we prove that $G$ has no good vertex if the length of the longest cycle in $G$ is at most $4$.

The \emph{Wiener index} is a widely studied topological index of graphs. One of the main problems in the area is to determine which graphs of given properties attain the extremal values of Wiener index. In this paper we resolve an open problem posed by Du in 2012. To this end we determine the unicyclic bipartite graphs with given size of parts having the maximum Wiener index. This completes the previous research in which the minimum case was solved.

In this paper we continue investigations of cover-incomparability graphs of finite partially ordered sets (see \cite{Bres,Bres2,Bres3,Bres4} and \cite{Max,MaxDH}). We consider in some detail the distinction between cover-preserving subsets and isometric subsets of a partially ordered set. This is critical to understanding why forbidden subposet characterizations of certain classes of cover-incomparability graphs in \cite{Bres} and \cite{Bres3} are not valid as presented. Here we provide examples, investigate the root of the difficulties, and formulate and prove valid revisions of these characterizations.