arXiv++ Combinatorics

The extremal function $ex(n, P)$ is the maximum possible number of ones in any 0-1 matrix with $n$ rows and $n$ columns that avoids $P$. A 0-1 matrix $P$ is called minimally non-linear if $ex(n, P) = ω(n)$ but $ex(n, P') = O(n)$ for every $P'$ that is contained in $P$ but not equal to $P$. Bounds on the maximum number of ones and the maximum number of columns in a minimally non-linear 0-1 matrix with $k$ rows were found in (CrowdMath, 2018). In this paper, we improve the bound on the maximum number of ones in a minimally non-linear 0-1 matrix with $k$ rows from $5k-3$ to $4k-4$. As a corollary, this improves the upper bound on the number of columns in a minimally non-linear 0-1 matrix with $k$ rows from $4k-2$ to $4k-4$. We also prove that there are not more than four ones in the top and bottom rows of a minimally non-linear matrix and that there are not more than six ones in any other row of a minimally non-linear matrix. Furthermore, we prove that if a minimally non-linear 0-1 matrix has ones in the same row with exactly $d$ columns between them, then within these columns there are at most $2d-1$ rows above and $2d-1$ rows below with ones.

Threshold-linear networks (TLNs) are models of neural networks that consist of simple, perceptron-like neurons and exhibit nonlinear dynamics that are determined by the network's connectivity. The fixed points of a TLN, including both stable and unstable equilibria, play a critical role in shaping its emergent dynamics. In this work, we provide two novel characterizations for the set of fixed points of a competitive TLN: the first is in terms of a simple sign condition, while the second relies on the concept of domination. We apply these results to a special family of TLNs, called combinatorial threshold-linear networks (CTLNs), whose connectivity matrices are defined from directed graphs. This leads us to prove a series of graph rules that enable one to determine fixed points of a CTLN by analyzing the underlying graph. Additionally, we study larger networks composed of smaller "building block" subnetworks, and prove several theorems relating the fixed points of the full network to those of its components. Our results provide the foundation for a kind of "graphical calculus" to infer features of the dynamics from a network's connectivity.

Permutations of the positive integers avoiding arithmetic progressions of length $5$ were constructed in (Davis et al, 1977), implying the existence of permutations of the integers avoiding arithmetic progressions of length $7$. We construct a permutation of the integers avoiding arithmetic progressions of length $6$. We also prove a lower bound of $\frac{1}{2}$ on the lower density of subsets of positive integers that can be permuted to avoid arithmetic progressions of length $4$, sharpening the lower bound of $\frac{1}{3}$ from (LeSaulnier and Vijay, 2011). In addition, we generalize several results about forbidden arithmetic progressions to construct permutations avoiding generalized arithmetic progressions.

If $G$ is a finite Abelian group, define $s_{k}(G)$ to be the minimal $m$ such that a sequence of $m$ elements in $G$ always contains a $k$-element subsequence which sums to zero. Recently Bitz et al. proved that if $n = exp(G)$, then $s_{2n}(C_{n}^{r}) > \frac{n}{2}[\frac{5}{4}-O(n^{-\frac{3}{2}})]^{r}$ and $s_{k n}(C_{n}^{r}) > \frac{k n}{4} [1+\frac{1}{e k}-O(\frac{1}{n})]^{r}$ for $k > 2$. In this note, we sharpen their general bound by showing that $s_{k n}(C_{n}^{r}) > \frac{k n}{4} [1+\frac{(k-1)^{(k-1)}}{k^k}-O(\frac{1}{n})]^{r}$ for $k > 2$.

We prove new theoretical results about several variations of the cop and robber game on graphs. First, we consider a variation of the cop and robber game which is more symmetric called the cop and killer game. We prove for all $c < 1$ that almost all random graphs are stalemate for the cop and killer game, where each edge occurs with probability $p$ such that $\frac{1}{n^{c}} \le p \le 1-\frac{1}{n^{c}}$. We prove that a graph can be killer-win if and only if it has exactly $k\ge 3$ triangles or none at all. We prove that graphs with multiple cycles longer than triangles permit cop-win and killer-win graphs. For $\left(m,n\right)\neq\left(1,5\right)$ and $n\geq4$, we show that there are cop-win and killer-win graphs with $m$ $C_n$s. In addition, we identify game outcomes on specific graph products. Next, we find a generalized version of Dijkstra's algorithm that can be applied to find the minimal expected capture time and the minimal evasion probability for the cop and gambler game and other variations of graph pursuit. Finally, we consider a randomized version of the killer that is similar to the gambler. We use the generalization of Dijkstra's algorithm to find optimal strategies for pursuing the random killer. We prove that if $G$ is a connected graph with maximum degree $d$, then the cop can win with probability at least $\frac{\sqrt d}{1+\sqrt d}$ after learning the killer's distribution. In addition, we prove that this bound is tight only on the $\left(d+1\right)$-vertex star, where the killer takes the center with probability $\frac1{1+\sqrt d}$ and each of the other vertices with equal probabilities.

In arXiv:1607.06679, Marcus proved that certain functions of multiple matrices, when summed over the symmetries of the cube, decompose into functions of the original matrices. In this note, we generalize the results from the Marcus paper to a larger class of functions of multiple matrices. We also answer a problem posed in the Marcus paper.

A gambler moves on the vertices $1, \ldots, n$ of a graph using the probability distribution $p_{1}, \ldots, p_{n}$. A cop pursues the gambler on the graph, only being able to move between adjacent vertices. What is the expected number of moves that the gambler can make until the cop catches them? Komarov and Winkler proved an upper bound of approximately $1.97n$ for the expected capture time on any connected $n$-vertex graph when the cop does not know the gambler's distribution. We improve this upper bound to approximately $1.95n$ by modifying the cop's pursuit algorithm.

Given a lower envelope in the form of an arbitrary sequence $u$, let $LSP(u, d)$ denote the maximum length of any subsequence of $u$ that can be realized as the lower envelope of a set of polynomials of degree at most $d$. Let $sp(m, d)$ denote the minimum value of $LSP(u, d)$ over all sequences $u$ of length $m$. We derive bounds on $sp(m, d)$ using another extremal function for sequences. A sequence $u$ is called $v$-free if no subsequence of $u$ is isomorphic to $v$. Given sequences $u$ and v, let $LSS(u, v)$ denote the maximum length of a $v$-free subsequence of $u$. Let $ss(m, v)$ denote the minimum of $LSS(u, v)$ over all sequences $u$ of length $m$. By bounding $ss(m, v)$ for alternating sequences $v$, we prove quasilinear bounds in $m^{1/2}$ on $sp(m,d)$ for all $d > 0$.

First, we prove tight bounds of $n 2^{\frac{1}{(t-2)!}α(n)^{t-2} \pm O(α(n)^{t-3})}$ on the extremal function of the forbidden pair of ordered sequences $(1 2 3 \ldots k)^t$ and $(k \ldots 3 2 1)^t$ using bounds on a class of sequences called $(r,s)$-formations. Then, we show how an analogous method can be used to derive similar bounds on the extremal functions of forbidden pairs of $0-1$ matrices consisting of horizontal concatenations of identical identity matrices and their horizontal reflections.

A $d$-dimensional zero-one matrix $A$ avoids another $d$-dimensional zero-one matrix $P$ if no submatrix of $A$ can be transformed to $P$ by changing some ones to zeroes. Let $f(n,P,d)$ denote the maximum number of ones in a $d$-dimensional $n \times \cdots \times n$ zero-one matrix that avoids $P$. Fox proved for $n$ sufficiently large that $f(n, P, 2) = 2^{k^{Θ(1)}}n$ for almost all $k \times k$ permutation matrices $P$. We extend this result by proving for $d \geq 2$ and $n$ sufficiently large that $f(n, P, d) = 2^{k^{Θ(1)}}n^{d-1}$ for almost all $d$-dimensional permutation matrices $P$ of dimensions $k \times \cdots \times k$.

Sequence pattern avoidance is a central topic in combinatorics. A sequence $s$ contains a sequence $u$ if some subsequence of $s$ can be changed into $u$ by a one-to-one renaming of its letters. If $s$ does not contain $u$, then $s$ avoids $u$. A widely studied extremal function related to pattern avoidance is $Ex(u, n)$, the maximum length of an $n$-letter sequence that avoids $u$ and has every $r$ consecutive letters pairwise distinct, where $r$ is the number of distinct letters in $u$. We bound $Ex(u, n)$ using the formation width function, $fw(u)$, which is the minimum $s$ for which there exists $r$ such that any concatenation of $s$ permutations, each on the same $r$ letters, contains $u$. In particular, we identify every sequence $u$ such that $fw(u)=4$ and $u$ contains $ababa$. The significance of this result lies in its implication that, for every such sequence $u$, we have $Ex(u, n) = Θ(n α(n))$, where $α(n)$ denotes the incredibly slow-growing inverse Ackermann function. We have thus identified the extremal function of many infinite classes of previously unidentified sequences.

The 0-1 matrix A contains a 0-1 matrix M if some submatrix of A can be transformed into M by changing some ones to zeroes. If A does not contain M, then A avoids M. Let ex(n,M) be the maximum number of ones in an n x n 0-1 matrix that avoids M, and let ex_k(m,M) be the maximum number of columns in a 0-1 matrix with m rows that avoids M and has at least k ones in every column. A method for bounding ex(n,M) by using bounds on the maximum number of edges in bar visibility graphs was introduced in (R. Fulek, Discrete Mathematics 309, 2009). By using a similar method with bar visibility hypergraphs, we obtain linear bounds on the extremal functions of other forbidden 0-1 matrices.

Let $A_{s,k}(m)$ be the maximum number of distinct letters in any sequence which can be partitioned into $m$ contiguous blocks of pairwise distinct letters, has at least $k$ occurrences of every letter, and has no subsequence forming an alternation of length $s$. Nivasch (2010) proved that $A_{5, 2d+1}(m) = θ( m α_{d}(m))$ for all fixed $d \geq 2$. We show that $A_{s+1, s}(m) = \binom{m- \lceil \frac{s}{2} \rceil}{\lfloor \frac{s}{2} \rfloor}$ for all $s \geq 2$, $A_{5, 6}(m) = θ(m \log \log m)$, and $A_{5, 2d+2}(m) = θ(m α_{d}(m))$ for all fixed $d \geq 3$.

We examine semi-bar visibility graphs in the plane and on a cylinder in which sightlines can pass through k objects. We show every semi-bar k-visibility graph has a (k+2)-quasiplanar representation in the plane with vertices drawn as points in convex position and edges drawn as segments. We also show that the graphs having cylindrical semi-bar k-visibility representations with semi-bars of different lengths are the same as the (2k+2)-degenerate graphs having edge-maximal (k+2)-quasiplanar representations in the plane with vertices drawn as points in convex position and edges drawn as segments.